Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Btw they better recruit some strong nurses for when they ween his sedation - nee fucker is going to stop him pulling his tube out if he's agitated 😂 

 

 

Edited by La Parka

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TBG said:

Just hope they don't look back in anger at what they've achieved this season.

 

Its the physios own fault for The Jam he's got himself into.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 years ago today. Taken from Fans Forum meeting.

 

"Do the club not think it is worth a cup run next season?"

 

The board outlined research into Premier League clubs in relation to domestic cup competitions in the last five years, with Swansea City the only club outside the traditional top six to win a domestic cup and not be relegated in the same season (Birmingham and Wigan Athletic were both relegated). Independent research into the cost of relegation over the past ten years showed there is a 50% chance of not gaining promotion back to the top flight and a 30% chance of being relegated to League One or further. In addition, if clubs do return to the Premier League, it takes four years on average"

 

 

Edited by Leemond

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be fair I don't think diagnosis of acute abdominal trauma is in a sports physios remit. So club doctors attend games?

 

Hopefully they managed to fix his bowel. Not sure if it's possible to be a footballer with a stoma. 

 

 

Edited by La Parka

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a point, Forest only made 3 subs. There can be an argument over the 3 substitution windows being too restrictive, however ignoring that for another day. Surely when a player is clearly injured, a sub outside the sub windows should be permitted, not just for concussion. I guess that will throw up a 'are they really injured' argument.

 

I do wonder if a discussion was had with the fourth official, to see if they could make another sub.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, duo said:

They need to change this rule not raising flag straight away - he wouldn't have been injured if they had

 

Not raising the flag didn't do the damage, it was the goal post. Should we start a conversation about potentially removing those and have instead VAR decide whether a shot had been inside the digital goal posts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a contender for the biggest VAR hater on this forum but I don't see this injury as being a solid argument against it. It could've happened at any point in the match ultimately, just like Given's did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see how it can be anything other than a dreadful look for VAR imo. It's outright proof that it's existence increases the likelihood of injuries. Not by a lot, obviously; it's a pretty uncommon event. But the fact is, if it doesn't exist then the guy doesn't rupture his intestine. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...