Jump to content

NUFC Transfer Rumours


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Dokko said:

 

The chances he gets at Everton will be very different to the ones here. Less of them, more pressure on the next one. 

 

Think his strike rate under ancellotti is probably more telling of what level he's at. 


IMG_6291.thumb.jpeg.1e8626707fda25c45d638baeae3e3b20.jpegIMG_6292.thumb.jpeg.2cf8089a63a0516065dee474915930ec.jpeg

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KaKa said:

 

Abysmal at finishing, because you saw him missing some big chances? My goodness man.

 

 

I think his goalscoring record reflects that, too. My goodness, man. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The player who underachieved the most compared to his xG.

 

I guess that could be taken either way.

 

But no thanks.... certainly nothing over £15m.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Whitley mag said:

There’s some folk on here just happy to sign any fucker, not a fan of DCL think we can do a lot better and show a bit more imagination.

To be fair, I am one of the people happy to sign anyone. Anyone that Eddie wants is the obvious caveat. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gjohnson said:

Still think if we can find an Isak, we can find better than DCL. 

we cant afford another Isak. and he didnt come to be a back up striker.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I learnt after the Gordon signing to never doubt the club/Howe again regarding transfers. That being said I’d go for someone other than DCL and I suspect we will.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always rated DCL as a player. Was a nightmare to defend against a couple of years ago.

 

I'd back the club to get him back to that. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, KaKa said:

 

When we signed Wilson he was an injury prone striker. Would you say it's been a worthwhile signing or no?

 

Isn't the whole reason people are happy to sell Wilson is because he's always injured? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, STM said:

I've always rated DCL as a player. Was a nightmare to defend against a couple of years ago.

 

I'd back the club to get him back to that. 

Howe couldn't get Ritchie back to his best so it doesn't always work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, relámpago blanco said:

Howe couldn't get Ritchie back to his best so it doesn't always work.

:lol::pow:

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, vexred said:

If DCL is £15M or under I'm not mad, but I can see it being £25M and I'd prefer someone else for that kind of money. 

 

What if it was 15m + 10m if achieves goals/appearances?;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kinda sucks that we're having to look at players that we need to get back to their best. 

 

I'd prefer players who are in the early stages of their upwards curve. 

 

If this is the only way we can get around PSR then I guess so be it. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Matt1892 said:


We were buying untapped potential with Gordon and Isak though.

 

Signing DCL would be similar to signing Antony Martial from Man Utd, it is a signing that if any of the other clubs pushing for European football were to make we would be laughing at them, instead we are hoping Howe can work some magic with him.

 

 

 

 

 

Only if they were signed as a starter. DCL won't be. Any striker we get, won't be. Isak is undisputed number one, just need someone who can be 2nd option, happy with that, and reliable to contribute with some quality.

 

I'd rather get some exotic, but if they're not getting solid minutes, they may not settle and it's deemed a bad deal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Pablo123 said:

I think his goalscoring record reflects that, too. My goodness, man. 

 

Ah, hear we go again. The good old goal scoring record.

 

The answer to everything. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sibierski said:

 

Only if they were signed as a starter. DCL won't be. Any striker we get, won't be. Isak is undisputed number one, just need someone who can be 2nd option, happy with that, and reliable to contribute with some quality.

 

I'd rather get some exotic, but if they're not getting solid minutes, they may not settle and it's deemed a bad deal.


We would still laugh at them if they spent £25 million on DCL.

 

It isn’t about exotic by the way, Howe prefers players with Premier League experience unless they have a high ceiling and I don’t have an issue with that.
 

What I would prefer is that we buy someone that can cover out wide and go through the middle to offer that depth all across the front line, at least that way we can interchange during games too.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Elliottman said:

Is this 4 pages of DCL chat based on a link from talk sport?! 

Hopefully, as that would mean it's not happening. I remain with that mindset.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, huss9 said:

we cant afford another Isak. and he didnt come to be a back up striker.

Missed the point entirely.

 

If we can find someone as good as isak under the noses of everyone, surely we have more imagination that looking at DCL.

 

Maybe our scouting team is seeing something I just don't with him

Link to post
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, KaKa said:

 

Ah, hear we go again. The good old goal scoring record.

 

The answer to everything. 

It's pretty important if you play with one man upfront, I'd say, but I bow down to your vastly superior knowledge.

 

I don't think any other team in the top 8 would take him. I like his all-round game, he's a handful, but I'd keep Wilson if he was the alternative. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...