Jump to content

NUFC Transfer Rumours


Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, kingxlnc said:

Simikan / Guehi

Raphina / Torres / Coman

DCL / Depay (still need a sub for Isak, Osula might be too raw) 

 

And a titwank from Kelly Brook whilst we are in dream land

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Izakaya said:

What the club hasn't done is helped itself expand that spending power by finding new sponsors and revenue streams. The only new sponsors we've managed to find in three years is a fake events company in Saudi Arabia that's already owned by our owners. 

What a load of rubbish. Our revenue has increased loads under the new owners. I suspect also we are holding certain deals back until the Man City case results is in. Otherwise you’d of committed to lower sponsorship money.

 

Also you’ve to remember not everyone wants to be associated with Saudi.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simakan would do it for me. Looks like Trippier could still give it a final shot this year. We can wait till next Jan / next summer to solve the RW.

 

If no new CB then this window is just absolutely unacceptable 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LFEE said:

What a load of rubbish. Our revenue has increased loads under the new owners. I suspect also we are holding certain deals back until the Man City case results is in. Otherwise you’d of committed to lower sponsorship money.

 

Also you’ve to remember not everyone wants to be associated with Saudi.

No, Izakaya absolutely has a point.  The revenue could only go up - and you don’t need to ‘hold back’ on commercial deals; they can have break clauses and have one-year contracts.  The revenues have went up as they would have under any reasonably competent ownership.  We’re not even getting low-hanging fruit sponsorship from KSA.  The criticism is absolutely valid. 

 

 

Edited by TheBrownBottle

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheBrownBottle said:

No, Izakaya absolutely has a point.  The revenue could only go up - and you don’t need to ‘hold back’ on commercial deals; they can have break clauses and have one-year contracts.  The revenues have went up as they would have under any reasonably competent ownership.  We’re not even getting low-hanging fruit sponsorship from KSA.  The criticism is absolutely valid. 

 

 

 

Seems so obvious, maybe too obvious.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder what sort of effect not signing anyone will have on our better players. We need to show them we are progressing.

 

As Sir Alex Ferguson used to advocate, signings are crucial even when you are winning and dominating, because it lifts morale and gives everyone a boost. It’s not just about what they can offer on the pitch, but also the effect they have on the guys already here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think we can get anything done now, we move to slow without Amanda and Ashworth, so unfortunately we've ran out of time, I just hope Eddie is not unhappy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ben said:

I don't think we can get anything done now, we move to slow without Amanda and Ashworth, so unfortunately we've ran out of time, I just hope Eddie is not unhappy.


@TBG he’s stealing your bit bro. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TheBrownBottle said:

No, Izakaya absolutely has a point.  The revenue could only go up - and you don’t need to ‘hold back’ on commercial deals; they can have break clauses and have one-year contracts.  The revenues have went up as they would have under any reasonably competent ownership.  We’re not even getting low-hanging fruit sponsorship from KSA.  The criticism is absolutely valid. 

 

 

 

To suggest we’ve only got Sela in is not a valid criticism like. It falls at the very first hurdle of being obviously factually incorrect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, kingxlnc said:

Simikan / Guehi

Raphina / Torres / Coman

DCL / Depay (still need a sub for Isak, Osula might be too raw) 

Simikan or Guehi and Torres or Raphina sounds good to me. 

Miggy to Fulham also fine. Coman NO! 

Keep Trippier, please

No need for Isak, Wilson and Osula cover imo.

Shut the window

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, toon25 said:

If there's a deal to be done for Chilwell, we should be all over it 

We’d need to shift 3 left backs and accommodate his huge wage. Probably not happening.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LFEE said:

What a load of rubbish. Our revenue has increased loads under the new owners. I suspect also we are holding certain deals back until the Man City case results is in. Otherwise you’d of committed to lower sponsorship money.

 

Also you’ve to remember not everyone wants to be associated with Saudi.

You just know that case result will get announced Monday morning when window has shut.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...