aussiemag Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 The good thing with Kelly is any sale is 100% PSR profit. So selling him for 20 mill or so. Would be far better value than selling a Harvey Barnes or a player like that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverThere Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 1 hour ago, aussiemag said: The good thing with Kelly is any sale is 100% PSR profit. So selling him for 20 mill or so. Would be far better value than selling a Harvey Barnes or a player like that. I'd sell them both.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fak Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 2 hours ago, aussiemag said: The good thing with Kelly is any sale is 100% PSR profit. Thought that was for academy graduates only? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatwax Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 (edited) 32 minutes ago, Fak said: Thought that was for academy graduates only? He was signed on a free, so it won’t be 100% I imagine because of signing on fee etc. but it would obviously be much higher than if we paid a transfer fee. Edited January 25 by Fatwax Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee_Johnny Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Spurs need a centre back. Might they be interested? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 I bloody hope so Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 2 minutes ago, Coffee_Johnny said: Spurs need a centre back. Might they be interested? That's honestly a good shout. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted yesterday at 11:01 Share Posted yesterday at 11:01 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stal Posted yesterday at 11:02 Share Posted yesterday at 11:02 Anyone wanting to join the race to sign him wants to get their fucking skates on. If we sell players, I'd like time to actually buy someone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted yesterday at 11:03 Share Posted yesterday at 11:03 We won’t sell him, every club linked is broke and only wants a loan deal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted yesterday at 11:30 Share Posted yesterday at 11:30 Dunno Marseille have splashed a bit of cash recently, they might do a perm. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fak Posted yesterday at 11:31 Share Posted yesterday at 11:31 27 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said: We won’t sell him, every club linked is broke and only wants a loan deal. Juve aren't broke surely? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago (edited) 4 hours ago, SUPERTOON said: We won’t sell him, every club linked is broke and only wants a loan deal. Not arsed anyway. He's only just turned 26 so he's a squad player for us at a decent age. I still reckon he's a lot better than he's performed so far. He was great in the cup win against Chelsea. Edited 20 hours ago by TRon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Get the feeling this lad is destined to be a quiz question. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago It’s likely a complete myth that a sale would benefit PSR. free transfers typically get a normal basic wage but a very high signing on fee, probably £5-10m in Kelly’s case - but the model of the signing on fee changed many years ago, it is nowadays a loyalty fee spread over the course of the contract. BUT If we sell we have to pay the loyalty fee off in full. So if it’s £10m and we sell for £5m we have actually made a £5m loss. the only way around this is for Kelly to submit a written transfer request. I doubt we will entertain a sale unless he does this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 28 minutes ago, James said: It’s likely a complete myth that a sale would benefit PSR. free transfers typically get a normal basic wage but a very high signing on fee, probably £5-10m in Kelly’s case - but the model of the signing on fee changed many years ago, it is nowadays a loyalty fee spread over the course of the contract. BUT If we sell we have to pay the loyalty fee off in full. So if it’s £10m and we sell for £5m we have actually made a £5m loss. the only way around this is for Kelly to submit a written transfer request. I doubt we will entertain a sale unless he does this. You've just made all of these numbers up though, James Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KetsbaiaIsBald Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago I’m not bothered if we sell him or not. He could be next years Lewis Hall or Chris Wood. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menace Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago At least those who said we're stuck with him on high wages for 5 years are wrong. Again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now