Jump to content

Odysseas Vlachodimos


NSG

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Kid Icarus said:

Okay, so you'll know that the only reason the fees are what they are is so that both clubs hit their own respective magic numbers and do it with players they can afford to lose. The fees are basically meaningless in terms of the players' actual worth.

 

 

 

The actual fees were somewhat meaningless in June for satisfying that three year period. But for this and future accounting periods what @r0cafella is saying is right. Vlachodimos costs us £6-7m per year. That's more than Anderson and Minteh cost us combined, so it's now a net negative for a useless player. 

 

What's done is done, desperate times and all that. There could have been worse outcomes, but it's certainly not ideal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, timeEd32 said:

 

The actual fees were somewhat meaningless in June for satisfying that three year period. But for this and future accounting periods what @r0cafella is saying is right. Vlachodimos costs us £6-7m per year. That's more than Anderson and Minteh cost us combined, so it's now a net negative for a useless player. 

 

What's done is done, desperate times and all that. There could have been worse outcomes, but it's certainly not ideal.

 

You can't just focus on the new accounting period and put the previous one that needed to be sorted out to one side when you're looking at the whole situation. It's only a net negative if you willingly choose to look at one and not the other. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...