54 Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 Solid D, think he could be a solid addition for a team in the lower reaches of the league, say an Ipswich or a Burnley if they come up. He's a pure, 7 out of 10 player, that has no thrills but also has no clangers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geogaddi Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 Surprised people are being as generous as a D when it comes to Taggart, especially when you consider Wilson got an E. Taggart is an obvious E , he was ok three years ago but since then has literally done nothing and when he has played looks slow, lethargic and unfit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dandy Man Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 (edited) Small D for Matty T. Difference between him and Wilson is that I could easily see Targett turning out another 3-4 seasons for some lower table PL team, Wilson I can barely see turning out another 3-4 games. Also Wilson has declined a lot more from a higher starting point whereas Targett has more gone from being quite good to bang average. Edited March 6 by Dandy Man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geogaddi Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 (edited) 57 minutes ago, Dandy Man said: Small D for Matty T. Difference between him and Wilson is that I could easily see Targett turning out another 3-4 seasons for some lower table PL team, Wilson I can barely see turning out another 3-4 games. Also Wilson has declined a lot more from a higher starting point whereas Targett has more gone from being quite good to bang average. I actually think the opposite , I reckon Wilson will do more over the next few seasons than Targett . I reckon if you asked some of the top end championship clubs which player they would rather take now it would be Wilson. It's such a daft debate anyway really as they are both well past their best. Edited March 6 by Geogaddi Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 12 hours ago, Geogaddi said: I actually think the opposite , I reckon Wilson will do more over the next few seasons than Targett . I reckon if you asked some of the top end championship clubs which player they would rather take now it would be Wilson. It's such a daft debate anyway really as they are both well past their best. Targett isn’t finished for me; he’s just a thoroughly mediocre PL LB. He did a cracking job on loan, but he was a baffling signing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cf Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Targett just barely scrapes home with a D rather than a D- A nice simple one next: Alexander Isak. Let's enjoy spending a few pages gushing about our star man. (Not to prejudge the results or anything like) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 (edited) A. Unquestionably. The most complete striker currently in football. He’d enhance any side. Edited March 7 by Sima Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 It's funny when you click this post from the main page, and you see everyone giving him a D before you realise they're still talking about Targett. Obviously an A. If he's not an A, why even have the ranking available? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 (edited) He’s our only A based on the definition rules. Phenomenal centre forward, would have a chance of starting in any side in world football. edit: probably could have done with an ‘S’ grade for actual world class, tbh Edited March 7 by TheBrownBottle Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT24 Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Anybody who doesn’t vote A should be banned. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Parka Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 He's incredible. A. No debate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 I would give Isak an A+ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 S Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 A for Isak Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Hozzo Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 A for me , those saying S, should maybe consider his availability/injury issues - and he does have quiet games Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Best striker in the world. C+ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Hozzo Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 he's good... I mean, he's no Chris Wood ... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack j Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 B+ An A if he stays for the next 5 years and wins us the league twice Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Stupidly good. For years we debated who the best since Shearer was, then this guy arrived and ended the argument very comprehensively. Fantastic player who has the potential to be the best we've ever had. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUHRLYASLEEVESUP Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Ah aye the best player we've had in a generation, possibly ever, dependent on his length of stay, spookily good in just about everything he does both on & off the field, the lads cooler than penguin piss. VVD wont fancy it again next Sunday, Isak has ripped him to bits plenty of times previously Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OpenC Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 (edited) 25 minutes ago, El Hozzo said: A for me , those saying S, should maybe consider his availability/injury issues - and he does have quiet games Those who are saying S are putting him at a theoretical top of the tree while you're putting him at the actual top of the tree with an A, you're both saying the same thing. Should you not be considering B for the same reasons? I wondered if the availability thing would enter into anybody's thinking. I don't think he's been unreasonably absent personally Edited March 7 by OpenC Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Poor at holding the ball up. Struggles to last 90mins, seems like his race is run after 70mins. Also struggles to be available for a full season so lacks durability. Question marks over his left foot finishing and bravery to put head where it hurts to score when it matters. Other than that he’s excellent. So guessing that works out at a B. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 22 minutes ago, OpenC said: Those who are saying S are putting him at a theoretical top of the tree while you're putting him at the actual top of the tree with an A, you're both saying the same thing. Should you not be considering B for the same reasons? I wondered if the availability thing would enter into anybody's thinking. I don't think he's been unreasonably absent personally Played 40 games for us last season and 31 for us so far this campaign without a backup striker to take the weight off him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now