Nicolas Jackson

[dcmk]

Would rather Jamie Vardy

[Alberts Mustache]

Please no. 

[black_n_white]

1 minute ago, midds said:

Reasons not to do this:

 

1. He's fucking shit

2.  He's fucking expensive

3. They'll take our money and invest in 3 payers who will all become better than Nicolas Fucking Jackson

 

We're absolutely fucking shit at this transfer shit if he's even near the radar. The whole thing has fallen apart

That’s the spirit 

[Nobody]

How much did Chelsea pay for him? 

[ponsaelius]

Honestly man, fuck off. 

[tgarve]

3 minutes ago, midds said:

Reasons not to do this:

 

1. He's fucking shit

2.  He's fucking expensive

3. They'll take our money and invest in 3 payers who will all become better than Nicolas Fucking Jackson

 

We're absolutely fucking shit at this transfer shit if he's even near the radar. The whole thing has fallen apart

I like him 

 

am I crazy? 

[La Parka]

Just now, Nobody said:

How much did Chelsea pay for him? 

32?

[Heron]

2 minutes ago, midds said:

PANIC!!!!!!

 

[Facundo Ferreyra]

Just now, La Parka said:

32?

 

£32? What a rip

[sushimonster85]

The data folks on social media love him. Reckon he's a pressing machine.

[La Parka]

1 minute ago, dcmk said:

Would rather Jamie Vardy

That's the spirit!

[Big River]

he's far from shite like

 

not sure he's worth 80m, but I'll let the finance nonces worry about that

[PauloGeordio]

22 minutes ago, Solitude20 said:

I am all for starting a new thread just to push the DCL thread down. 

Here, here.

[Wilson]

Kill iz

[duo]

1 minute ago, tgarve said:

I like him 

 

am I crazy? 

[Astroblack]

I like Jackson. Gets dog’s abuse and keeps on going. Sets a lot of goals up and when he isn’t tripping over himself is a good finisher. 

[Heron]

If Jackson is a press-aholic and you then have Wissa in a 352 that could be interesting.

[andycap]

2 minutes ago, Nobody said:

How much did Chelsea pay for him? 

36 or 38 million i think. 

[Famous Nick]

please no. Watkins much better. Chelsea want to recoup combined fee of Pedro and Delap from this sale. what a joke as both of those have higher potential than Jackson.

[Fak]

Just now, Famous Nick said:

please no. Watkins much better. Chelsea want to recoup combined fee of Pedro and Delap from this sale. what a joke as both of those have higher potential than Jackson.

 

What are you famous for?

[geordie_b]

Pretty sure if we agree terms then Chelsea will just come in and try to sign him as a replacement for the outgoing Jackson. 

[PauloGeordio]

1 minute ago, sushimonster85 said:

The data folks on social media love him. Reckon he's a pressing machine.

Whatever he did at Chewsee, he does better here under Wor Eddie. If it’s Wissa and this fella plus, CM, and RCB 

let’s go!

[duo]

Seriously when we get to this level of depression - tell Isak he can't leave. 

[Kid Icarus]

3 minutes ago, Big River said:

he's far from shite like

 

not sure he's worth 80m, but I'll let the finance nonces worry about that

In the context of £80m and choosing to sell Isak for what? Anything from £120m to £150m, he's fucking shite like.

 

 

Edited August 6, 2025 by Kid Icarus

[Wolfcastle]

4 minutes ago, duo said:

Be a huge step backwards - HUGE

We could take the same step back for a fraction of that price/wages too