Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just now, The Prophet said:

Ended up surprisingly deep at times.

 

Find it hard to read into performances given how much of a cakewalk it ended up being.

Agreed - there’s nothing to be gained in thinking too hard about any of it.  Qarabag are utter shite. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, HawK said:

Off the ball perhaps but  he was definitely ahead of Willock and Tonali in possession I thought. He dropped back a couple of times to move their players about to make spaces

that map is the average position of their touches on the field, so it’s entirely in possession. But even out of possession he dropped back into the flat 5 like he did at the weekend against Villa.

 

the left sided centre mid (Joelinton, Willock) is nearly always more advanced than the right sided one (Longstaff, Bruno) in Howe’s 4-3-3. The main times he played on the last line were when we wanted to launch it long from the back and needed an aerial presence, just like we do with Joelinton.

 

It’s good. If we can fit him in the existing setup as a more creative but perhaps less athletic Joelinton then it’s exactly what we need for certain games.

 

 

Edited by Smal

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Smal said:

he didn’t play as a number 10. He played as an 8 in our usual 4-3-3 (again)

 

IMG_5061.thumb.jpeg.89e4f570d55d72669932c6fc56d964fa.jpeg

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wish they'd have him push up more, even if it's in this same shape.

 

Thought he was good tonight, but would be a lot more dangerous a bit further up, in more of a classic 10 position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely looks more himself now he's able to receive the ball facing the game rather than battling with centre backs which was becoming a highly frustrating watch. He produced some lovely moments tonight, and now he needs to develop his ability to make timely runs into the box and start getting on the end of moves and becoming more of a goal threat. The confidence he's gaining by seeing more of the ball should hopefully aid in this over the coming months.

I used to enjoy watching Milinkovic-Savic for Serbia who was more imposing and box-to-box than Woltemade but similar in his massive frame and delicate footwork which made him a unique challenge for the opposition between the lines and he chipped in with plenty of goals over his career.

Still not sure where he goes from here, whether it's like a Benzema arc whose goals dried up for a few seasons and he dropped back as a playmaker, before combining those skills with his previous finishing instincts to become a complete striker and one of the best in the world in his latter years.

 

 

Edited by Infinitely Content

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pilko said:

Looks much more at home deeper with pace closer to him.

Getting people around him has always been the key for me, in general the midfield to attack has felt far too disjointed most of the season. I don't particularly care how you achieve it, can be a 9 or 10 but getting the team to function as a unit is what's important.

 

It's not only a waste of his talents to fail to do so but quite frankly it also hurts everyone around him too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We've seen it every time he's played in that position against varying levels of opponents. But every time his little flicks and passes around corners in that position with the pace we have around him now with Gordon, Elanga, Barnes and Willock. It's a real possible source of joy for us if he can get turned and release our runners now. Compared to him playing as the highest point and turning a defender and then having to try and run the ball himself. 

 

Early days but his new system looks fruitful and certainly allows us to get better use out of Gordon and Osula as Pacey runners further forward to chase and close down. Also means Elanga is getting more minutes to develop and improve. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Touch of class this lad. He was asked to do a job when he came in and he did it admirably, but his game is glaringly obvious and I'm certain that's not lost on Howe. Barnes' second against Benfica is exactly how he's meant to work and the wingers have failed him a bit in that respect imo. I'm delighted he's purposefully been given a deeper role recently and if we'd had more options up front I think he'd have been there sooner. Put others around him that are firing and he'll be devastating. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

i thought he played well last night, and hope to see him for the rest of the season with someone infront of him. What do the stats say? I know a few on here were calling him a ghost, but I saw a lot of link up play and him getting the ball forward and out of mid. Probably a little too deep, but if thats needed to get him involved then so be it. He's easily our most technical competent player, and can walk a ball out of tight situations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I love Wolte, I think he's great.

 

I read that Liverpool have bulked up Wirtz since he arrived. Since Nick does not have pace he might lose, a bit more meat on him might make defenders have to pull on him harder and hold him in a more blatant way than they are currently doing. The PL can afford the biggest and fastest players as his opponents, so there is no shame in him taking a while to really shine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

he already seems stronger. able to hold his own a lot more than he was earlier in the season.

he is a magnet for the opposition though - always 2 or 3 on him immediately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not convinced by him but getting him deeper for a little bit is probably the right idea to take some of the pressure off him and get him more involved in games. We also need that creativity and assuredness with the ball with Bruno out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, St1pe said:

Not sure I agree with that as the eye test suggests otherwise. 

the eye test doesn’t suggest otherwise though though. If you watch the Villa game where they had some settled possession, Woltemade was part of the flat midfield 5 when we switch to a mid/low block. Exactly the same as when Joelinton or anyone else plays there. 

 

When we have settled possession Woltemade is playing between the lines from the left of a midfield 3, just as when anyone else plays there. It’s exactly the same system. Banging my head against a wall when people keep saying the system has changed/we’ve gone 4-2-3-1 :lol:. Just look at where Ramsey vs Villa or Willock vs Qarabag played, they get into the same high positions as Woltemade does, just from the other side. They aren’t playing as part of a midfield 2 at all.

 

We played a 4-2-3-1 against Bournemouth I think in January and that looked very different.

 

The question long term is whether he’s athletic enough to play the role. For some reason he looks like he has a hell of a lot more stamina as a central midfielder than he does as a striker though, I guess it’s just from not having to sprint to lead the press as often.

 

 

Edited by Smal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Enjoyed Howe prickling at the question. The guy believes in his preferred system so much and is obviously very satisfied at watching it working again. 4-3-fucking-3.

Link to post
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Smal said:

the eye test doesn’t suggest otherwise though though. If you watch the Villa game where they had some settled possession, Woltemade was part of the flat midfield 5 when we switch to a mid/low block. Exactly the same as when Joelinton or anyone else plays there. 

 

When we have settled possession Woltemade is playing between the lines from the left of a midfield 3, just as when anyone else plays there. It’s exactly the same system. Banging my head against a wall when people keep saying the system has changed/we’ve gone 4-2-3-1 :lol:. Just look at where Ramsey vs Villa or Willock vs Qarabag played, they get into the same high positions as Woltemade does, just from the other side. They aren’t playing as part of a midfield 2 at all.

 

We played a 4-2-3-1 against Bournemouth I think in January and that looked very different.

 

The question long term is whether he’s athletic enough to play the role. For some reason he looks like he has a hell of a lot more stamina as a central midfielder than he does as a striker though, I guess it’s just from not having to sprint to lead the press as often.

 

 

 

All fair points 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...