Guest tobiazvanderziaz Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 Taylor, Milner, Solano, Martins and Dyer played well.... For their second goal, our two new young players fucked it up in the left side of the defence....thats what would happen because of their age and experience....get the finger out and buy a couple of defenders Roeder Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 FFS people need to sit down a chill out a bit... It's the cup, Birmingham were always going to throw everything at us, we've got them at home now. We weren't as bad as people are making out, yes we should have played better and put the game to bed, but we didn't... In case you missed it, Brum had 10-men for 50 minutes and are in the division below us... they also lost 2 players to injury during the game. I'm not excusing that, but people who sit here and make their knee jerk reactions (a lot of whoem probably didn't watch the game) need to calm down a bit, FFS you think we'd been knocked out... I saw the game and I agree there were a lot of good moments on a bad pitch, but it's just an infuriatingly typical scoreline against an utterly average club. It gets irritating when the same thing happens season after season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ckmuzza Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 Martins and Dyer were absolutely paggered by the 75 minute mark, I was desperately hoping he'd give at least one of them a break because it cannot have been easy-going on them on a pitch like St. Andrews. His lack of bottle in regards to substitutes is my main gripe with Glenn, although I still think we've done remarkably well lately. Managers need to gamble sometimes, though, especially when arguably our two most important players look wrecked and are at a high risk to injury during a game. I can't see how Carroll could have offered anything less than either of them in the last 15 minutes, I know they were given chances but they did a magic job of fucking them up. Agree 100%. One of those two needed to be substituted as both Dyer and Martins just seemed to be going through the motions at that point. Caroll or Luque would have provided some fresh legs and either would of had a point to prove Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 being in the championship doesn't mean much, as they are only 7 places behind us in the football league. and having 10 men, as been proved many many many many times before, can spur a team on to a good preformance. That's like saying there's not much between Man U & Reading as there are only 7-8 places difference in the league. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamesD Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 the gulf between the top teams in the premiership is much greater between the lower premiership and top championship teams. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC06 Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 We just stopped playing after Dyer's goal Maybe we thought they are going to beat themselfs When is the replay? And is Sib injured? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Geordie Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 Replay is a week on Wednesday apparently - Jan 17th. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC06 Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 Replay is a week on Wednesday apparently - Jan 17th. Are you sure? We are playing Tottenham on 14th and West Ham on the 20th If we play Birmingam on the 17th thats 3 games in 6 days :confused: :confused: lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_R Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 Replay is a week on Wednesday apparently - Jan 17th. Are you sure? We are playing Tottenham on 14th and West Ham on the 20th If we play Birmingam on the 17th thats 3 games in 6 days :confused: :confused: lol First off, it's 3 games in 7 days. But what's so odd about that? Happens all the time. Matches at the weekend and one in midweek. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lenny Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 matt le tissier has the hickups!lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC06 Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 Replay is a week on Wednesday apparently - Jan 17th. Are you sure? We are playing Tottenham on 14th and West Ham on the 20th If we play Birmingam on the 17th thats 3 games in 6 days :confused: :confused: lol First off, it's 3 games in 7 days. But what's so odd about that? Happens all the time. Matches at the weekend and one in midweek. There is nothing odd but with our thin squad and no indication of transfers its worrying :confused: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syrette Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 Replay is a week on Wednesday apparently - Jan 17th. Are you sure? We are playing Tottenham on 14th and West Ham on the 20th If we play Birmingam on the 17th thats 3 games in 6 days :confused: :confused: lol First off, it's 3 games in 7 days. But what's so odd about that? Happens all the time. Matches at the weekend and one in midweek. There is nothing odd but with our thin squad and no indication of transfers its worrying :confused: Which is exactly why we couldn't afford to take this game to a replay. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 What's worse is that West Ham is a 100% absolute must-win game. And now we have to play midweek. Absolutely fucking sick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bellers Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 Really that's still not an excuse if we don't take all three points off West Ham... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 This isn't a knee-jerk reaction, Roeder is a nicer version of Souness and makes all of the same mistakes except for two, he doesn't publicly fall out with players and so far hasn't wasted the clubs money. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syrette Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 What's worse is that West Ham is a 100% absolute must-win game. And now we have to play midweek. Absolutely fucking sick. With you there 100%. Ruined my day this has. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 Really that's still not an excuse if we don't take all three points off West Ham... West Ham could have half a new squad by then, man. There's no excuse for not beating a shower like Birmingham either but here we are. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 Goals coming up on SSN if anyone cares... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 By the way our midfield got totally dominated today by a Championship side (when they had eleven men), whose fault was that? I've been led to believe that our midfield is always excellent when Scott Parker doesn't play. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bellers Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 By the way our midfield got totally dominated today by a Championship side (when they had eleven men), whose fault was that? I've been led to believe that our midfield is always excellent when Scott Parker doesn't play. I think people were making the point our best midfield was a combination of Butt and Emre rather than either of the two being paired with Parker... We were dominated because Butt is average going forward and Pattison is no better than a Champioship player himself... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 Certainly sounded like a we missed a battling, dominating midfield performance that Emre has provided on more than one occassion lately. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulivye Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 i only saw the last 40 mins or so, but matti pattison was an absolute liability i didn't see much that he did right, and he was gifting possession to the opposition in glaring fashion! blueupset.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
garth Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 We should have slaughtered them in the second half and now we are paying the price for it!. I have to say Roland's tactics have let us down again far as I'm concerned Patterson should have never been in the team he was way out of his league today, O'Brien is fast, but can't cross a ball! should have had Luque playing there on the left would have given us some depth on the left. All in all a shit day really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alan_Shearer Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 Huntington was shite, and O'briens crosses are shite. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 By the way our midfield got totally dominated today by a Championship side (when they had eleven men), whose fault was that? I've been led to believe that our midfield is always excellent when Scott Parker doesn't play. I think people were making the point our best midfield was a combination of Butt and Emre rather than either of the two being paired with Parker... We were dominated because Butt is average going forward and Pattison is no better than a Champioship player himself... Pattison was on the left first half, he can't hold responsibility for the domination of central midfield. I think people have a good point when they talk about a stronger midfield with Emre and Butt, but it's got to a stage now where when we lose with Parker, we get a thread about how shit he is and how much worse we are with him, when we win without him, we get exactly the same and when we do well with him, he gets blamed for a goal or anything that'll make him look bad (last week against Man Utd being a perfect example). Our problems go a lot deeper than Scott Parker, but some people would have you believe otherwise. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now