Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. The concern for me is that we seem to once again to be failing to do due diligence. Everyone and his granny seemed to be aware that the lad wanted to be in London except for our transfer team. Not a good look.
  3. From everything I've read we fucked him over a bit the first time. Everything was ready to go and then Wilson got injured and we bailed last minute and pivoted to Isak. Probably should have signed them both in hindsight. Anyway, his whole getting suspended by his club for fighting with a team mate, swinging elbows at people schtick does make him feel like more of a Chelsea player so on to he next one. Then when Chelsea sign him, on the the next one. Eventually they won't notice when we bid for someone.
  4. This was my least favourite way for us to spend £60m. Rather have 2 players from outside of the PL and gamble that way, than £60m on a stroppy player who doesn't nailed a place in the xi.
  5. Agree, personally think it’ll be tomorrow Evening. This has been the clubs number one target this summer.
  6. Game owa Hopefully they'd beat Chelsea
  7. Heard anything on Dibling?
  8. If I recall correctly, Wilson got injured and we decided to go all out an a CF in Isak instead of Pedro.
  9. I guess the reason I thought he was number 1 target is that we have history there and we've made a clear attempt to sign him again. But yes, there's no proof that we havent stalled making an increased offer because we have other irons in the fire that are our actual preferences. I'm sceptical that's the case though as I don't imagine any selling clubbing not leaking our interest in the hope to agitate further interest. The news about the Trafford, Pedro and Elanga bids wouldn't have come from our side. The above point probably negates the need to answer the second part, but for the sake of discussion, by all accounts Brighton rejected 1 maybe 2 of our offers. Of course Chelsea could and probably would have been a threat no matter, but it surprises me - on the assumption he was our number 1 target - that we hadn't at least agreed on a fee at any point.
  10. Think we’ll get a here we go tomorrow or Tuesday for this one
  11. I though we pulled out to sign Isak, but can't really remember.
  12. Disgustingly clinical from Kane. Flamengo punished horribly there.
  13. Honestly can’t remember what happened with the Watford one now. Did Brighton just outbid us?
  14. Well, I am hoping for some example. Well you just said we need quality player Quality players cost a lot of money. We are not spending more than 10-15 million on a striker, if we get Gk, RCB and RW.
  15. Bit too soon to say whether he's being let down, far better to make that judgement when the window closes It's not even July yet, plenty of time left
  16. Would be fun with a new name. Guehi, Elanga, Trafford and Pedro has been going on for while now so an update on them doesnt make the heart beat very fast
  17. Just a casual: “Throw in £350m of asset sales and the women’s team and they have nothing to worry about in PSR terms”. So if they hadn’t used their bent loopholes they’d be fucked?
  18. That’s the theory. But the best transfers in the PL are almost always for players bought from abroad. Even the most expensive PL to PL transfers are sketchy. Later in the Window is best for foreign signings imo. Less options to sell for the selling club.
  19. Based on nothing at all I feel like this might work out for us. Plan B or C or whatever we’re on might involve a little more risk but I back us to identify talented players.
  20. Most of the anger I have isn't about missing out on Joao Pedro - I don't like him or think he's particularly good + don't think Pedro/Delap/Gitten improve Chelsea - but it's the pattern of repeatedly embarrassing ourselves with these transfer sagas. Even the one we're buying, Trafford, has basically taken a year. The one positive is that maybe our lot are finally forced into turning attention to the continent.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...