mrmojorisin75 Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were shit apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. They always are, utterly shit without fail Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. They always are, utterly s*** without fail Howay man lads. Credit where it's due. At least be balanced. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. They always are, utterly s*** without fail Howay man lads. Credit where it's due. At least be balanced. It's what I think. He is extremely cautious and imo makes selection mistakes week after week, be it starting 11 or subs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. Howay man lads. Credit where it's due. At least be balanced. I did, I gave him credit for moving Gouffran, his other decisions during the game were shit and he invited West Ham onto us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collage Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. They always are, utterly s*** without fail Howay man lads. Credit where it's due. At least be balanced. It's what I think. He is extremely cautious and imo makes selection mistakes week after week, be it starting 11 or subs. At least he only makes 1 or 2 selection mistakes rather than 5 or 6 like Pardew. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. They always are, utterly s*** without fail Howay man lads. Credit where it's due. At least be balanced. It's what I think. He is extremely cautious and imo makes selection mistakes week after week, be it starting 11 or subs. At least he only makes 1 or 2 selection mistakes rather than 5 or 6 like Pardew. Granted Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. They always are, utterly s*** without fail Howay man lads. Credit where it's due. At least be balanced. It's what I think. He is extremely cautious and imo makes selection mistakes week after week, be it starting 11 or subs. So no positives at all today? Just shite in game subs eh? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. Howay man lads. Credit where it's due. At least be balanced. I did, I gave him credit for moving Gouffran, his other decisions during the game were s*** and he invited West Ham onto us. There was more than that Mick. We were absolutely class first half, everything about is was bang on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Ah the balance police are back, dishing out credit where it's dues all over the shop. I've missed them since Pardew fucked off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. They always are, utterly s*** without fail Howay man lads. Credit where it's due. At least be balanced. It's what I think. He is extremely cautious and imo makes selection mistakes week after week, be it starting 11 or subs. So no positives at all today? Just shite in game subs eh? Lots of positives yeah, but we were only commenting on his in game choices and I agree with Mick that they aided in inviting West Ham to come onto us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 There was more than that Mick. We were absolutely class first half, everything about is was bang on. I only criticised him for his substitutions because they could have been costly, he needs to improve his substitution because they are causing us problems and he regularly gets them wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Ah the balance police are back, dishing out credit where it's dues all over the shop. I've missed them since Pardew f***ed off. Aye, you're right. Everything's shite. Let's just not enjoy anything eh? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lenny Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 I think he's probably being overly cautious due to our position tbh. Hopefully if we settle into some kind of form he'll start to take a few more risks if there's a chance it can change the game in our favour. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. They always are, utterly s*** without fail Howay man lads. Credit where it's due. At least be balanced. It's what I think. He is extremely cautious and imo makes selection mistakes week after week, be it starting 11 or subs. So no positives at all today? Just s**** in game subs eh? Lots of positives yeah, but we were only commenting on his in game choices and I agree with Mick that they aided in inviting West Ham to come onto us. And positives to mention? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. They always are, utterly s*** without fail Howay man lads. Credit where it's due. At least be balanced. It's what I think. He is extremely cautious and imo makes selection mistakes week after week, be it starting 11 or subs. So no positives at all today? Just s**** in game subs eh? Lots of positives yeah, but we were only commenting on his in game choices and I agree with Mick that they aided in inviting West Ham to come onto us. I'm not even saying I disagree btw, but it isn't the first thing that springs to mind after today's great win. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Nothing wrong with inviting them onto us if you can hit them with pace on the counter. For that reason alone, the Gouffran sub instead of Aarons was odd. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Great first half. Would've liked to have seen Aaron's off Mitro when they were chasing the game but no moaning from me, massive 3 points. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Ah the balance police are back, dishing out credit where it's dues all over the shop. I've missed them since Pardew f***ed off. Aye, you're right. Everything's shite. Let's just not enjoy anything eh? What are you even talking about man? People are enjoying the win, we still need to improve though and people are pointing that out. His subs are consistently shite, even worse considering he's alienated our left winger and left Mbabu back home. Adding a pointless platitude to the end of that achieves nothing, it's completely irrelevant to the point being made. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Great first half. Would've liked to have seen Aaron's off Mitro when they were chasing the game but no moaning from me, massive 3 points. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Ah the balance police are back, dishing out credit where it's dues all over the shop. I've missed them since Pardew f***ed off. Aye, you're right. Everything's s****. Let's just not enjoy anything eh? What are you even talking about man? People are enjoying the win, we still need to improve though and people are pointing that out. His subs are consistently s****, even worse considering he's alienated our left winger and left Mbabu back home. Adding a pointless platitude to the end of that achieves nothing, it's completely irrelevant to the point being made. Mbabus injured btw. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Aye, you're right. Everything's s****. Let's just not enjoy anything eh? He's right about not needing balance, you don't have to post something negative about him just because you've posted something positive about him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Fair enough. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Im enjoying the win but I think McClarens a shit cunt. Thats balanced imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odear Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Just think back to this time last year.... remember it... we were a team which could barely string a couple of passes together and if we'd had to have played more games during that period, we would have been relegated. It's not even up for debate, we were that bad. In the space of 6 months, to turn THAT team into the one we've been watching recently, is nothing short of exceptional. I don't particularly like or dislike the man but he's done ok and I respect him as a coach. We haven't had any luck this year, our performances deserved more and hopefully now we won't have to rely on luck and keep getting points. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 What I'd say is a massive difference between him and Pardew, is that Pardew had a shit game plan and relied on magic, whereas McClaren set up and system appears to be to get the players of quality and play to their strengths. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now