Toon1984 Posted Monday at 12:57 Share Posted Monday at 12:57 2 hours ago, TK-421 said: Yep, they mentioned that on MOTD, saying the wording is still quite ambiguous. It is ambiguous. The ball was between his hands (but not touching both at the same time). It should say ‘between 2 hands and in contact with both, simultaneously’. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted Monday at 13:15 Share Posted Monday at 13:15 15 minutes ago, Toon1984 said: It is ambiguous. The ball was between his hands (but not touching both at the same time). It should say ‘between 2 hands and in contact with both, simultaneously’. It should. I’d image that they will go and look at the wording of that rule and amend it. I always thought that you had to have 2 hands on the ball to be deemed under control. The defence afterwards makes it clear that having 2 hands on the ball isn’t required and it says or, then goes on to explain holding the ball. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted Monday at 13:52 Share Posted Monday at 13:52 2 hours ago, Joelinton7 said: Emery Batman villain arc has begun That's actually quite beautiful Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joelinton7 Posted Monday at 14:08 Share Posted Monday at 14:08 15 minutes ago, Hanshithispantz said: That's actually quite beautiful Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted Monday at 14:25 Share Posted Monday at 14:25 2 hours ago, r0cafella said: What happened to Brummie? He posted in the Sunderland thread a couple of days ago so still around Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted Monday at 14:51 Share Posted Monday at 14:51 Stands on the keepers hand. Clear foul Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted Monday at 14:53 Share Posted Monday at 14:53 3 hours ago, Joelinton7 said: Emery Batman villain arc has begun It's like an Adam Curtis documentary Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted Monday at 14:53 Share Posted Monday at 14:53 1 minute ago, gdm said: Stands on the keepers hand. Clear foul Wew Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFCDoog Posted Monday at 14:55 Share Posted Monday at 14:55 That's what i was talking about - even if, after that footage you still think it wasn't a foul (I probably still lean towards it not being) it definitely wasn't a howler and can certainly see why the ref blew up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted Monday at 14:56 Share Posted Monday at 14:56 You could cast Thomas Frank and Unai Emery as the killers in a gritty European detective noir with Eddie Howe as the calm collected cop with his sidekick Jason Tindall flying off the handle and getting up in suspects’ faces. Fairly sure you’ve got a multi-million pound award winning series there. Dan Burn would be an excellent undertaker with some secrets to share Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackyboy Posted Monday at 14:57 Share Posted Monday at 14:57 I don't care about Villa after their fans reaction that day when we were relegated Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
astraguy Posted Monday at 15:05 Share Posted Monday at 15:05 The bottom half of this is interesting with psr. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cp85wj92yg8o Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Edgar Posted Monday at 15:11 Share Posted Monday at 15:11 8 hours ago, tarie4 said: They voted for it, when the take over happened mate. Only nufc voted against it. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cj6kg09ee84o Quote Premier League clubs have voted to approve changes to rules governing commercial deals, despite opposition from Manchester City, Newcastle United, Nottingham Forest and Aston Villa. At a meeting in London on Friday, clubs took under 30 minutes to approve the changes to Associated Party Transaction regulations (APTs). Clubs voted 16 in favour and four against. Manchester City and Aston Villa had both written to rival clubs before the meeting to seek support. They voted against the current PSR ruleset. But they did vote to block our sponsorship deals when the takeover happened. So, yeah. Fuck them for that early self-interest cowardice. But they are also getting fucked over by PSR here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LionOfGosforth Posted Monday at 15:15 Share Posted Monday at 15:15 18 minutes ago, gbandit said: You could cast Thomas Frank and Unai Emery as the killers in a gritty European detective noir with Eddie Howe as the calm collected cop with his sidekick Jason Tindall flying off the handle and getting up in suspects’ faces. Fairly sure you’ve got a multi-million pound award winning series there. Dan Burn would be an excellent undertaker with some secrets to share Frank has been channeling Max Cady for a while Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groundhog63 Posted Monday at 15:18 Share Posted Monday at 15:18 21 minutes ago, gbandit said: You could cast Thomas Frank and Unai Emery as the killers in a gritty European detective noir with Eddie Howe as the calm collected cop with his sidekick Jason Tindall flying off the handle and getting up in suspects’ faces. Fairly sure you’ve got a multi-million pound award winning series there. Dan Burn would be an excellent undertaker with some secrets to share That's shit that man. Give me full time football manager/part time detective Mr Steve Barnes any day. He's the Real (Madrid) deal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teslact Posted Monday at 15:48 Share Posted Monday at 15:48 2 hours ago, Stifler said: It should. I’d image that they will go and look at the wording of that rule and amend it. I always thought that you had to have 2 hands on the ball to be deemed under control. The defence afterwards makes it clear that having 2 hands on the ball isn’t required and it says or, then goes on to explain holding the ball. I think they clarified it after this? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted Monday at 16:55 Share Posted Monday at 16:55 18 hours ago, gdm said: Some Villa fans wanting the PL to write off their PSR deficit because of this If that happened I'd want some compensation for the gazillions we missed out on when Mbappe got given a dodgy pen in injury time in the CL last year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted Monday at 17:33 Share Posted Monday at 17:33 2 hours ago, David Edgar said: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cj6kg09ee84o They voted against the current PSR ruleset. But they did vote to block our sponsorship deals when the takeover happened. So, yeah. Fuck them for that early self-interest cowardice. But they are also getting fucked over by PSR here. Villa have only cared about PSR since Emery came in and they realised that if they tried, they could be a force in the Premier League. It’s weird, in general I wished them well in Europe this season, without watching them to win it. It was good for their fans to have that Bayern match, progress out of League stage of the competition etc. Once it became clear last season that we wouldn’t get a Champions League slot, most Newcastle fans actually wanted them to qualify. I can understand them feeling hard done by after yesterday, but them going on the way they are is a total disregard to the fact that other teams have suffered dodgy decisions that have punished them this season*, haven’t Forest had a fair few games where they have had dodgy decision go against them that’s cost them plenty of points? * Aside from Liverpool who will never ever have decisions go against them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-421 Posted Monday at 19:07 Share Posted Monday at 19:07 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted Monday at 19:36 Share Posted Monday at 19:36 29 minutes ago, TK-421 said: Paddy Power don’t care. Love their shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
astraguy Posted Monday at 19:43 Share Posted Monday at 19:43 @brummie how bad will this affect you? I believe you sold duran far to early and then gambled on jan signings Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted Monday at 19:52 Share Posted Monday at 19:52 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teslact Posted Monday at 19:52 Share Posted Monday at 19:52 42 minutes ago, TK-421 said: 1:35 in "We cooked the roast, set the table, poured the gravy - then let Newcastle sit down and eat it" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoreboard82 Posted Monday at 19:57 Share Posted Monday at 19:57 They're forgetting the failed goal line technology incident v Sheffield United the other year. Can't remember exactly but wouldn't they have went down had that Sheffield United "goal" stood? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted Monday at 19:59 Share Posted Monday at 19:59 Theie transfer splurge in January never worked out, I wonder if they need to raise some cash now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now