Pilko Posted July 13, 2011 Share Posted July 13, 2011 Wayne Routledge Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted July 13, 2011 Share Posted July 13, 2011 Wouldn't be surprised now if the fee for N'Zogbia's between the £12-15m mark for Villa. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted July 13, 2011 Share Posted July 13, 2011 Paying the going rate for him? Idiots. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash Posted July 13, 2011 Share Posted July 13, 2011 Liverpool fan on twitter reckons they were given £80m THIS SUMMER and have £31.5 left plus whatever they get for dead wood. I wonder what they'll be able to spend that on... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted July 13, 2011 Share Posted July 13, 2011 Liverpool fan on twitter reckons they were given £80m THIS SUMMER and have £31.5 left plus whatever they get for dead wood. I wonder what they'll be able to spend that on... ......a bore hole to new zealand ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridman Posted July 13, 2011 Share Posted July 13, 2011 Liverpool fan on twitter reckons they were given £80m THIS SUMMER and have £31.5 left plus whatever they get for dead wood. I wonder what they'll be able to spend that on... Weren´t they in for Phil Jones? Skrtel is shit and Carra is getting old, guess they'll spend 10-15m on a quality DC Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted July 13, 2011 Share Posted July 13, 2011 An average centre-back. Seriously though I wouldn't be shocked to see them pay something like £15m for someone like Shawcross though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted July 13, 2011 Share Posted July 13, 2011 An average centre-back. Seriously though I wouldn't be shocked to see them pay something like £15m for someone like Shawcross though. More like £20 million Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanSkÃrare Posted July 13, 2011 Share Posted July 13, 2011 Liverpool fan on twitter reckons they were given £80m THIS SUMMER and have £31.5 left plus whatever they get for dead wood. I wonder what they'll be able to spend that on... Mark Noble £17m Fabrice Muamba £14,5m Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted July 13, 2011 Share Posted July 13, 2011 Quite excited to see Sneijder in the PL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted July 13, 2011 Share Posted July 13, 2011 @guardian_sport Guardian sport Luka Modric has handed in a transfer request. More to follow... #thfc 34 minutes ago Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted July 13, 2011 Share Posted July 13, 2011 @guardian_sport Guardian sport Luka Modric has handed in a transfer request. More to follow... #thfc 34 minutes ago See Cesc, that's how you do it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted July 13, 2011 Share Posted July 13, 2011 @guardian_sport Guardian sport Luka Modric has handed in a transfer request. More to follow... #thfc 34 minutes ago And that's him officially off to Chelsea then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 @guardian_sport Guardian sport Luka Modric has handed in a transfer request. More to follow... #thfc 34 minutes ago See Cesc, that's how you do it. Fuck. Off. VI. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 @guardian_sport Guardian sport Luka Modric has handed in a transfer request. More to follow... #thfc 34 minutes ago See Jose Enrique, that's how you do it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 Refreshing to see a team properly going for it like even it does seem to be being done in a slapdash way. Fair play to the dippers. But when City does it, it's disgusting? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 http://www.footybunker.com/arsenals-next-centre-back-will-be-21-year-old-dane the answer to all our problems. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 £20 million for Downing. Fuck's sake. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpal78 Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 @guardian_sport Guardian sport Luka Modric has handed in a transfer request. More to follow... #thfc 34 minutes ago See Jose Enrique, that's how you do it. And when Carroll did it, some accuse the club of putting a gun to his head. Players putting in a transfer request is a norm these days, people just don't want to believe it when it happens to us Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leffe186 Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 Refreshing to see a team properly going for it like even it does seem to be being done in a slapdash way. Fair play to the dippers. But when City does it, it's disgusting? Well quite. What's refreshing about a team spunking great wodges of cash they've essentially won in a lottery, not earned? That's been the case every year since Abramovich. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 Refreshing to see a team properly going for it like even it does seem to be being done in a slapdash way. Fair play to the dippers. But when City does it, it's disgusting? Well quite. What's refreshing about a team spunking great wodges of cash they've essentially won in a lottery, not earned? That's been the case every year since Abramovich. Weren't Liverpool skint pretty much before they got bought out? Just because they were good 25 years ago doesn't mean what they're doing is any different to Chelsea & City. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toontownman Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 Were on the verge of going under. Daglish is assembling quite the squad of potentially decent home grown players. Thing is he has spent 80m too much on what could turn out to be a huge pile of wank. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PhilB Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 Refreshing to see a team properly going for it like even it does seem to be being done in a slapdash way. Fair play to the dippers. But when City does it, it's disgusting? Well quite. What's refreshing about a team spunking great wodges of cash they've essentially won in a lottery, not earned? That's been the case every year since Abramovich. Weren't Liverpool skint pretty much before they got bought out? Just because they were good 25 years ago doesn't mean what they're doing is any different to Chelsea & City. They were skint because the former owners used the clubs profits to pay the interest on their loan, which was borrowed to buy the club. Those interest payments aren't there anymore. It's different to City and Chelsea in as much as our new sponsorship deals are more lucrative than both of those clubs, and with the debt interest payments being eliminated Liverpool are in a near healthy position. Given the new financial rules Liverpool will be able to hold it's own with both Chelsea and City a few years down the line. Arsenal and Man United, because of their bigger stadiums, will take more matchday revenue than us until we either move or refurbish Anfield. Once that's done only Man United will take more football related revenue over a season. If we were only good 25 years ago where does that put clubs like yourselves? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 Nowhere near Liverpool in the same way you're no way near Chelsea and City. You still got lucky with a takeover though. I dare say if someone wanted to give Ashley his money back then we could also spunk £80m on players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 Refreshing to see a team properly going for it like even it does seem to be being done in a slapdash way. Fair play to the dippers. But when City does it, it's disgusting? Well quite. What's refreshing about a team spunking great wodges of cash they've essentially won in a lottery, not earned? That's been the case every year since Abramovich. Weren't Liverpool skint pretty much before they got bought out? Just because they were good 25 years ago doesn't mean what they're doing is any different to Chelsea & City. They were skint because the former owners used the clubs profits to pay the interest on their loan, which was borrowed to buy the club. Those interest payments aren't there anymore. It's different to City and Chelsea in as much as our new sponsorship deals are more lucrative than both of those clubs, and with the debt interest payments being eliminated Liverpool are in a near healthy position. Given the new financial rules Liverpool will be able to hold it's own with both Chelsea and City a few years down the line. Arsenal and Man United, because of their bigger stadiums, will take more matchday revenue than us until we either move or refurbish Anfield. Once that's done only Man United will take more football related revenue over a season. If we were only good 25 years ago where does that put clubs like yourselves? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts