Dinho lad Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 the wage limit talk is utter cack. do you think we'd truned down a very good bosman because we don't want to break our wage limit but would buy someone for millions only just under the limit ? we'll pay what we feel we can afford and what we feel players are worth. Do you think Ba and Marveaux are on 50k or above? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 Why is it utter cack and your assumption is not? Nobody on here knows either way. because one way makes sense, the other makes no sense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 To you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 We have a "wage limit" in the same way every other club does. City and Chelsea having wage limits Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 the wage limit talk is utter cack. do you think we'd truned down a very good bosman because we don't want to break our wage limit but would buy someone for millions only just under the limit ? we'll pay what we feel we can afford and what we feel players are worth. Do you think Ba and Marveaux are on 50k or above? haven't got a clue. more to the point do you think we would actually spend more overall, which we may well have to by paying a transfer fee aswell as wages as opposed to slightly higher wages for a free. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 We have a "wage limit" in the same way every other club does. City and Chelsea having wage limits Even they will not pay an infinite amount of money on wages, although their "wage limit" is certainly less restrictive than most. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 To you. so you think we'd say no to a player because he is slightly over our wage limit but say yes to a one under the wage limit who also comes with a fee making the entire deal more ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 We'd go without. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 We'd go without. if we'd go without and the wages were under the supposed limit then surely it means that that wasn't the limit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 I don't know what you're on about tbh. I just can't see why the concept of a wage structure (and accompanying limit) is 'utter cack'. I'd say it makes perfect sense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 There'll be a structure. For example, I think we'd happily pay Debuchy £50-60k a week, but wouldn't pay Simpson much more than £20k as an example. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 I think its that it has to be balanced properly.... Take Arsenal for example they won't pay above 90k for anyone but pay 60k a week for crap and best players they refuse to give 100k plus to keep them. Which is stupid IMO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Eggenberger Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 There'll be a structure. For example, I think we'd happily pay Debuchy £50-60k a week Not a chance in the realms of asmodeus. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimburst Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 I don't know what you're on about tbh. I just can't see why the concept of a wage structure (and accompanying limit) is 'utter cack'. I'd say it makes perfect sense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 does anyone think if messi said "i fancy a season in the prem before going off to russia for megabucks but want to go to a club that need me as they haven't won anything for ages and i want 70k" we'd say sorry no can do, our wage limit is 50k. we will have an idea of a finite set of funds we have to use but like household bills things can be jiggled about stretch things in some areas if needed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 does anyone think if messi said "i fancy a season in the prem before going off to russia for megabucks but want to go to a club that need me as they haven't won anything for ages and i want 70k" we'd say sorry no can do, our wage limit is 50k. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 does anyone think if messi said "i fancy a season in the prem before going off to russia for megabucks but want to go to a club that need me as they haven't won anything for ages and i want 70k" we'd say sorry no can do, our wage limit is 50k. ridculous example granted but answer it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 I don't have to answer anything as I don't particularly believe either way. (re wage limit) All I mentioned is that I heard of a 50k limit. Mind you, I accept your point that we're most likely flexible about it. We probably a have a flexible wage limit, which is really not much different from everybody else. (Bar one or two) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Swift Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 Madras is right. We'll be flexible with the wages we offer. We will have an overall budget but I don't think we'll have a serious cap on individual wages. We'll have different caps for different players. Players playing in important positions will have a higher cap. Younger players, lower. Does anyone think Debuchy will be on 50k? I highly doubt it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Swift Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 Transfer fees will also pay a part. Since bosmans don't cost anything in fees to other clubs, our wage limit for them will obviously be higher than players who cost money. I imagine that most players we buy will get a loyalty payment from their previous club, meaning that they would in general accept lower weekly wages. Bosmans won't cost anything in fees to other clubs, only sign on fees and wages, so our 'cap' on them will be higher. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyPalAl Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 This the 'Is there a wage limit or not' thread? Every thread seems to be getting de-railed at the moment. The sooner the summer transfer window opens the better........ Anyway, back on topic. I don't think he will stay. But he might. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chicken little Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 see, i don't think he will go. but he might. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Eggenberger Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 see, i don't think he will go. but he might. Hi alan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.S.R. Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 perfect. No, that was Curt Hennig. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now