Happinesstan Posted June 21, 2017 Share Posted June 21, 2017 £400m is a bit steep, should be closer to 300. The price tag surley means only the very serious & mega rich are contenders, putting off the time wasters. £400m is about right. Club will generate that in less than 3 years in the PL. Usual rule of thumb is a business is worth what it generates in revenue over a 3 year period. Profits maybe not just revenue. ?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odear Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 How much money did he put into buying shares in Rangers? There's a bigger picture to him just selling up and letting the retail contract go. If there's a real offer on the table for us, one that would mean him selling up everything. It would make sense that there's going to be first a separation between Sports Direct the club merchandise. Graham Carr leaving only raises more questions. Was it over a power struggle with Rafa, or does he know something about the future of the club, a future where possibly Rafa has all the assurances from new owners where he did not? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 Carr has left ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robm Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 £400m is a bit steep, should be closer to 300. The price tag surley means only the very serious & mega rich are contenders, putting off the time wasters. £400m is about right. Club will generate that in less than 3 years in the PL. Usual rule of thumb is a business is worth what it generates in revenue over a 3 year period. Profits maybe not just revenue. ?? A very rough way to value a small business is a multiple of profit = revenue - expenses. If it was just a multiple of revenue even Sunderland would be worh £300m plus Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 £400m is a bit steep, should be closer to 300. The price tag surley means only the very serious & mega rich are contenders, putting off the time wasters. £400m is about right. Club will generate that in less than 3 years in the PL. Usual rule of thumb is a business is worth what it generates in revenue over a 3 year period. Profits maybe not just revenue. ?? A very rough way to value a small business is a multiple of profit = revenue - expenses. If it was just a multiple of revenue even Sunderland would be worh £300m plus Most football club would be worth nothing then, considering the vast amount of them make next to no money. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happinesstan Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 £400m is a bit steep, should be closer to 300. The price tag surley means only the very serious & mega rich are contenders, putting off the time wasters. £400m is about right. Club will generate that in less than 3 years in the PL. Usual rule of thumb is a business is worth what it generates in revenue over a 3 year period. Profits maybe not just revenue. ?? A very rough way to value a small business is a multiple of profit = revenue - expenses. If it was just a multiple of revenue even Sunderland would be worh £300m plus How much profit did we make in the last 3 years? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robm Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 £400m is a bit steep, should be closer to 300. The price tag surley means only the very serious & mega rich are contenders, putting off the time wasters. £400m is about right. Club will generate that in less than 3 years in the PL. Usual rule of thumb is a business is worth what it generates in revenue over a 3 year period. Profits maybe not just revenue. ?? A very rough way to value a small business is a multiple of profit = revenue - expenses. If it was just a multiple of revenue even Sunderland would be worh £300m plus How much profit did we make in the last 3 years? As I said it's a very rough way to value a small business. Revenue is meaningless was my point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magpie1892 Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 There's also the small topic of ground advertising as the SD logos are stopping us from at least another £10m+ a year as it is. And the rest. I've heard figures of between £25m and £40m a year from people who are qualified to make that valuation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Toon Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 There's also the small topic of ground advertising as the SD logos are stopping us from at least another £10m+ a year as it is. And the rest. I've heard figures of between £25m and £40m a year from people who are qualified to make that valuation. Hence why I put £10m+ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happinesstan Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 £400m is a bit steep, should be closer to 300. The price tag surley means only the very serious & mega rich are contenders, putting off the time wasters. £400m is about right. Club will generate that in less than 3 years in the PL. Usual rule of thumb is a business is worth what it generates in revenue over a 3 year period. Profits maybe not just revenue. ?? A very rough way to value a small business is a multiple of profit = revenue - expenses. If it was just a multiple of revenue even Sunderland would be worh £300m plus How much profit did we make in the last 3 years? As I said it's a very rough way to value a small business. Revenue is meaningless was my point. Ah. missed the bit about small business, sorry. I can see how it would apply to a small business, looking for investment. But selling a business outright, especially a football club is a lot different. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 As things stand right now, The club is easily worth 400m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 Can't really get too invested in thinking about it really. The folk interested in taking us over could give us welcome investment and stability, or they could be a Venky's style bunch of bell-ends. Ashley could continue doing OK as he has been since appointing Rafa and preside over some sustained improvement, or he could do something mindboggling stupid and fuck it all up again. Stick or twist comes with the same amount of risk as far as I can see, without knowing any more about potential owners and their intentions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 Wonder if it's because Rafa doesn't want any of the linked players, especially Lejeune? Despite the fact every report says Lejeune has been handpicked by Rafa? I know it's hard, but because you are not hyped about a transfer doesn't mean Rafa isn't behind it. At least with Carr is gone now though we do know where we stand. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magpie1892 Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 There's also the small topic of ground advertising as the SD logos are stopping us from at least another £10m+ a year as it is. And the rest. I've heard figures of between £25m and £40m a year from people who are qualified to make that valuation. Hence why I put £10m+ Yes, that's right. Ferraris cost more than a tenner; the idea was to provide a more accurate figure than that which you proposed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
number9shirt Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 Mike looks like he's selling his rangers shares, is this the investment SSN mentioned? Did they specify NUFC. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 Mike looks like he's selling his rangers shares, is this the investment SSN mentioned? Did they specify NUFC. Sky Sports News. A channel made around baiting you into watching it all day for the same news repeated every 10 minutes. You really think they're going to spoil it for you by giving exact details until 5pm? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odear Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 It looks like he's systematically making his investments less complicated, cutting ties etc. He's definitely up to something. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pons Alias Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa/article-4626000/amp/Rangers-chairman-Dave-King-announces-end-Sports-Direct-retail-dispute.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 we're not getting fucking sold like, not a chance Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Toon Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 There's also the small topic of ground advertising as the SD logos are stopping us from at least another £10m+ a year as it is. And the rest. I've heard figures of between £25m and £40m a year from people who are qualified to make that valuation. Hence why I put £10m+ Yes, that's right. Ferraris cost more than a tenner; the idea was to provide a more accurate figure than that which you proposed. A random figure with a minimum value neither shows me unqualified to make that valuation or even attempting to provide one. If I remember rightly, it was Llambias or someone at the fans forum that attempted to cost the sponsorship to be around £8m a year but then again im still guessing. As for Ferraris, they are £20+ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weznufc Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 He has indeed sold all of his shares in rangers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 It looks like he's systematically making his investments less complicated, cutting ties etc. He's definitely up to something. Running to be President of the United States of America Direct. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chopey Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 What's he up to ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 Probably about 17st. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGuv Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 Probably about 17st. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts