BlueStar Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 Nah i can't see it actually, Virgin was paying us 10m a year Ashley might be crazy but he's not stupid if he's giving up a 10m a year shirt sponsorship deal he's not going to do it for his own bloody company Well he was perfectly happy to replace about 80% of the hoardings from paying companies in the ground with freebies for Sports Direct. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 Let's pony up the cash and get "N-O" on the front of the shirts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 Nah i can't see it actually, Virgin was paying us 10m a year Ashley might be crazy but he's not stupid if he's giving up a 10m a year shirt sponsorship deal he's not going to do it for his own bloody company Well he was perfectly happy to replace about 80% of the hoardings from paying companies in the ground with freebies for Sports Direct. They are pocket money compared to shirt and naming rights though. I hope. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 can't look past the dreaded SD in all honesty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 http://imageshack.us/a/img401/7411/hurk.png Looks alright... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 http://imageshack.us/a/img401/7411/hurk.png Looks alright... I hate you sweetie Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 Nah i can't see it actually, Virgin was paying us 10m a year Ashley might be crazy but he's not stupid if he's giving up a 10m a year shirt sponsorship deal he's not going to do it for his own bloody company Well he was perfectly happy to replace about 80% of the hoardings from paying companies in the ground with freebies for Sports Direct. Good point definitely trying to be positive for once and hopefully something good comes from this Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 Comes in a bag for life with a bucket sized mug ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MW Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 that doesnt look as bad as i imagined, but fuck that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 I don't really care anymore if it is Sports Direct. It's already plastered over everything else, and the money issue doesn't matter to us because we don't spend any money above we get from player sales anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 can't look past the dreaded SD in all honesty. this. we're doomed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowlingcrofty Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 Nah i can't see it actually, Virgin was paying us 10m a year Ashley might be crazy but he's not stupid if he's giving up a 10m a year shirt sponsorship deal he's not going to do it for his own bloody company Well he was perfectly happy to replace about 80% of the hoardings from paying companies in the ground with freebies for Sports Direct. Good point definitely trying to be positive for once and hopefully something good comes from this I think the sponsors pulled the plug when we got relegated so he stuck Sports Direct everywhere where they used to be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 I don't really care anymore if it is Sports Direct. It's already plastered over everything else, and the money issue doesn't matter to us because we don't spend any money above we get from player sales anyway. But haven't Pardew and Dekka said that the shirt and stadium naming money goes on players. Obviously if we believe what they say. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 I don't believe a word they say, and with very good reason. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 I don't believe a word they say, and with very good reason. Aye, maybe a truth will finally worm its way through the lies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 I don't really care anymore if it is Sports Direct. It's already plastered over everything else, and the money issue doesn't matter to us because we don't spend any money above we get from player sales anyway. "Guess who wins again etc." Know what you mean though, sad state of affairs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 http://imageshack.us/a/img401/7411/hurk.png Looks alright... It's only a sponsor at the end of the day. On the shirt, I have no problem. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 Give that it's on a white background you could put any logo on the kit and it'd look adequate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 If Dekka is saying we ended it early, then this new deal has to be worth more money surely ?. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 If Dekka is saying we ended it early, then this new deal has to be worth more money surely ?. Is correct, but this is mike Ashley we are talking about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 Typical Ashley though, 8 year deal for Pards & staff then whack fkn Sports Direct on the shirts Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 If Dekka is saying we ended it early, then this new deal has to be worth more money surely ?. Is correct, but this is mike Ashley we are talking about. Aye. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 At least i'm saving some money if the new sponsor are SD. No way i'm buying a new shirt then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 must be a stadium/shirt tie in deal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 We were told all the Sports Direct sings were to show potentioal sponsors what they could be getting & they expected a quick deal...... still waiting. If its not going to be Sports Direct on the shrts then whoever it is is ofeering more than Virgin Money but not enough for th entire shirt stadium sponsoship. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts