Bimpy474 Posted May 9, 2023 Share Posted May 9, 2023 (edited) 7 hours ago, Yorkie said: Will be very interesting to see how and which ones they choose to release, like. Having to listen to the referees during the game will be another horrendous imposition created by this collective shitshow, but sadly it's absolutely necessary at this point. They have to release all or none, otherwise they'll choose not to release anything controversial, and carry on protecting the big clubs more than they already do. Edited May 9, 2023 by Bimpy474 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyn davies Posted May 9, 2023 Share Posted May 9, 2023 5 hours ago, Yorkie said: Will be very interesting to see how and which ones they choose to release, like. Having to listen to the referees during the game will be another horrendous imposition created by this collective shitshow, but sadly it's absolutely necessary at this point. Their dialects will be interesting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordiesteve710 Posted May 9, 2023 Share Posted May 9, 2023 The only time I'd be bothered about hearing the audio is when they're communicating with VAR about something that VAR has reviewed and/or wants the ref to review. And it should be transmitted live in every TV and radio broadcast of the game so that everyone (audience and commentators) don't end up second guessing what they're looking at and muddying the waters even further. The rest will either be completely bland or some sort of "comedy banter" to show how personable and normal the refs are as humans. So pointless. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted May 9, 2023 Share Posted May 9, 2023 5 hours ago, Yorkie said: I think it's absolutely necessary in the interests of transparency and accountability. Sets of fans are having the piss taken out of them every week because they are being left with no explanation for decisions made. It could also benefit the referees themselves: rather than being continuously accused of being incompetent and/or corrupt, they'll only be accused of being incompetent. (I don't believe there is any corruption from officials). On the other hand, you might doubt how much of a net gain there would be from the officials' point of view: mic'ing them up means they become more established characters in the whole pantomime and probably greater targets for abuse. For the record I'm not 100% against VAR. I just think it has far too great an intervention currently and I think the whole landscape of refereeing is in a far worse state now than it was pre-VAR. Yeah, that's just one of the few unintended consequences that'll imo make things even worse for little to no reward. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted May 9, 2023 Share Posted May 9, 2023 Not looking forward to these Eurononce referees next season, think we’ll have some stinkers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted May 9, 2023 Share Posted May 9, 2023 3 minutes ago, Rich said: Not looking forward to these Eurononce referees next season, think we’ll have some stinkers. These days if you tackle a player and you're English you'll be thrown in jail. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Jinx Posted May 9, 2023 Share Posted May 9, 2023 I’d be all for teams being able to have a challenge.. similar to tennis, maybe 3 a match, up to the captain to decide when to use them. VAR can be generally used for violent conduct or dangerous tackles but goal related incidents are either used as a challenge by a team who think they’ve been wronged or by a team who think they should have a penalty. Linesmen flag like they used to. But also goals will stand like they used to too unless challenged. That would sort the flow of games out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan Posted May 9, 2023 Share Posted May 9, 2023 For me, VAR should have a set time to make a decision and if they can’t, the on field decision stands. Something like 60 seconds. Would save the huge delays thats happening in every game now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted May 9, 2023 Share Posted May 9, 2023 46 minutes ago, Dr Jinx said: I’d be all for teams being able to have a challenge.. similar to tennis, maybe 3 a match, up to the captain to decide when to use them. VAR can be generally used for violent conduct or dangerous tackles but goal related incidents are either used as a challenge by a team who think they’ve been wronged or by a team who think they should have a penalty. Linesmen flag like they used to. But also goals will stand like they used to too unless challenged. That would sort the flow of games out. Get a VAR challenge wrong and you lose a substitution. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted May 9, 2023 Share Posted May 9, 2023 I would be in favour of the time limit on decisions, but I'd also like to see slow motion replays banned when it comes to clear and obvious decisions that do not involve red cards. If you need 3 replays, slowed down and zoomed in then it can't be a clear and obvious error. So you either change that definition or find someway to give a degree of consistency on how you apply it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCK Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 11 hours ago, Rich said: Not looking forward to these Eurononce referees next season, think we’ll have some stinkers. YELLOW CARD Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowlingcrofty Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 (edited) Michael Oliver doing the Roma game and wearing a camera it seems. Edit: he’s taken it off now. Bit odd. Edited May 11, 2023 by bowlingcrofty Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted May 13, 2023 Share Posted May 13, 2023 Absolutely no protection offered to our players today by that cunt Hooper. Someone should give him a kick in the shins every 2 minutes and see if he can do 90 minutes without thinking there's a problem. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toon25 Posted May 13, 2023 Share Posted May 13, 2023 Once again, no accountability for blatant incompetence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted May 13, 2023 Share Posted May 13, 2023 (edited) Personally think he’s had a good game. Got the three big decisions right. Can’t ask for more nowadays. Edited May 13, 2023 by Flip Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC Posted May 13, 2023 Share Posted May 13, 2023 Unfortunately the average football fan thinks every foul is a yellow card these days Thought Hooper was fine, got the 3 penalty decisions and the red card correct Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemtizz Posted May 13, 2023 Share Posted May 13, 2023 Why wasn’t Firpo sent off for the handball? Ludicrous decision. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafalove Posted May 13, 2023 Share Posted May 13, 2023 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pata Posted May 13, 2023 Share Posted May 13, 2023 Thought Hooper was really good, absolutely no complaints. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viana Posted May 13, 2023 Share Posted May 13, 2023 Thinking back to the Palace no goal and what those 2 points do for us now. Also, Firpo must be his step son - that tackle on Bruno is a red. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohmelads Posted May 13, 2023 Share Posted May 13, 2023 7 minutes ago, Pata said: Thought Hooper was really good, absolutely no complaints. Funny. But being serious, I wonder if Firpo took a bung to get himself sent off. The ridiculous dive, then the shocking tackle, then playing volleyball in the area and then cleaning out the last man. Could've been sent off twice. The 'tackle' his eyes are on the leg, not even the correct leg, his studs are up, he's nowhere near the ball. I don't see how on earth VAR miss that or decide the ref has got it right within the laws of the game. It's an easy decision. Firpo did finally get his red in the 91st min and then we got a few seconds of the ball in play. We were poor, let's be honest, but all we ask is the ref to take charge of the game. He was having a laugh and joke with Ayling in the tunnel before the game. At least try to stay professional. I said before the game that managers like Allardyce tend to get away with more and we saw it with Dyche and Everton with the Longstaff tackle. Just ref the game and not the occasion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted May 13, 2023 Share Posted May 13, 2023 The ref was fine. Forgot his yellow card here and there, but it wasnt Marriner stuff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pata Posted May 13, 2023 Share Posted May 13, 2023 Firpo tackle on Bruno was never a straight red. Got lucky on the handball but not that big of a deal IMO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted May 13, 2023 Share Posted May 13, 2023 58 minutes ago, nemtizz said: Why wasn’t Firpo sent off for the handball? Ludicrous decision. Aye what was the craic there? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted May 13, 2023 Share Posted May 13, 2023 The keeper should have been off two, the yellow card was a warning to stop the antics and we ratcheted the up instead and of course got away with it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now