SEMTEX Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Dunno how anyone can say it CLEARLY took a deflection, I watched it a million times last night and couldn't see it. Time to get HD? I was watching in 1080p, and still didn't see a thing, if there was it was extremely slight and there was no visible deviation in the ball's flight. You were definitely not watching in 1080p. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Dunno how anyone can say it CLEARLY took a deflection, I watched it a million times last night and couldn't see it. Time to get HD? I was watching in 1080p, and still didn't see a thing, if there was it was extremely slight and there was no visible deviation in the ball's flight. You were definitely not watching in 1080p. I was thinking that. No TV is broadcast in 1080p. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Geek squad, put your motherfucking hands up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100926233543/simpsons/images/4/4f/Rock-Bottom.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Don't worry about it neezles, we're future proofed in life, they're just jealous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
afar Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Dunno how anyone can say it CLEARLY took a deflection, I watched it a million times last night and couldn't see it. Time to get HD? I was watching in 1080p, and still didn't see a thing, if there was it was extremely slight and there was no visible deviation in the ball's flight. You were definitely not watching in 1080p. I was thinking that. No TV is broadcast in 1080p. Whatever, it was still bloody HD so STFU Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Dunno how anyone can say it CLEARLY took a deflection, I watched it a million times last night and couldn't see it. Time to get HD? I was watching in 1080p, and still didn't see a thing, if there was it was extremely slight and there was no visible deviation in the ball's flight. You were definitely not watching in 1080p. I was thinking that. No TV is broadcast in 1080p. Whatever, it was still bloody HD so STFU Yeah, but did you have the correct aspect ratio, or was the picture stretched to fit? So many variables. You clearly can't be trusted. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEEJ Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 All you lot in here on your high horse about the ball taking a deflection man. It's not clear at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Is HIGH HORSE word of the day or something? It took a deflection. It barely made any difference. Who cares. Us being turbo shit is a bigger concern. Talk about us being turbo shit, please. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Wish I'd never said anything now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Is HIGH HORSE word of the day or something? It took a deflection. It barely made any difference. Who cares. Us being turbo shit is a bigger concern. Talk about us being turbo shit, please. It's better than straw man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Is HIGH HORSE word of the day or something? It took a deflection. It barely made any difference. Who cares. Us being turbo shit is a bigger concern. Talk about us being turbo shit, please. It's better than straw man. Wind your neck in Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Is HIGH HORSE word of the day or something? It took a deflection. It barely made any difference. Who cares. Us being turbo shit is a bigger concern. Talk about us being turbo shit, please. It's better than straw man. http://crampinyostylez.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/high-horse-edit2.png v http://transitionculture.org/wp-content/uploads/strawman1.jpg http://phil327.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/harry-hill-trafalgar-meet5.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 http://fc00.deviantart.net/fs32/i/2008/197/5/7/horse_shit_by_echoindark.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ujpest doza Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Dunno how anyone can say it CLEARLY took a deflection, I watched it a million times last night and couldn't see it. Time to get HD? I was watching in 1080p, and still didn't see a thing, if there was it was extremely slight and there was no visible deviation in the ball's flight. You were definitely not watching in 1080p. I was thinking that. No TV is broadcast in 1080p. SKY HD is like, says so on the info bar along the top of my screen when i first switch on. I'm not convinced there was a deflection either, ball didn't change flight or direction etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Is it fuck. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Dunno how anyone can say it CLEARLY took a deflection, I watched it a million times last night and couldn't see it. Time to get HD? I was watching in 1080p, and still didn't see a thing, if there was it was extremely slight and there was no visible deviation in the ball's flight. You were definitely not watching in 1080p. I was thinking that. No TV is broadcast in 1080p. SKY HD is like, says so on the info bar along the top of my screen when i first switch on. I'm not convinced there was a deflection either, ball didn't change flight or direction etc. Signal/Broadcast is 1080i, box and tv convert it to 1080p display. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oakie Doke Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 anyone else think our demise is down to the "How highly do you rate.." thread? We were doing just fine before that thread came along. We may well have angered the football gods by doing their judging for them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Spready's to blame. Adds up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 It definitely took a slight deflection. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Yep. Very slight. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate Toon Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Interesting watching the first half back. It was good to see us not resort to lumping it, even if we were given a lot of time on the ball, we weren't particularly creative but apart from the odd daft mistake, we looked OK and kept it well enough. We do however, really need to work on getting the strikers moving in the box when a cross comes in. We managed to get some decent balls in there but there was no movement from strikers or midfielders in the area, Fulham found it far too easy. We also really needed/need a creative attacking presence in the middle, to drive us forward and add some variety to our play. Ba did drop back a bit, especially after we went 4-4-2 but his link-up play, more often than not, wasn't good enough. We do have players that can fill that void, HBA, Marveaux, Cabaye and possibly Anita as well but I can't see Pards going for it. Watching the second and for a good 10 minutes before he went off, HBA was playing behind Cisse and Ba, and he was dangerous. I hope it's in Pards' thoughts, he should have persevered with it with Marveaux. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now