Jump to content

Recommended Posts

One of the main reasons I don't want McClaren is that people would continue to misspell his fucking name.

 

Get Chris Houghton and Lee Clarke in as assistants.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's been a very dull few years, I'm sure Garde/Jemez are far more likely to be a success here than Vieira (not that that would be guaranteed, plenty of managers with good reputations have struggled in certain jobs) I'd just personally find the start of next season more interesting with Vieira in charge. If it's a disaster results wise so be it.

 

Obviously in an ideal world we'd just give Klopp £5m a year and £100m to spend but for some strange reason I can't see it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just looking at some of the managers who have/are leaving clubs this summer outside of england

 

Jurgen Klopp

Carlo Ancelotti

Huub Stevens

Roberto Di Matteo

Thomas Schaff

Michael Laudrup

Paul Clement

 

Obviously the first two are unrealistic

Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the main reasons I don't want McClaren is that people would continue to misspell his f***ing name.

 

Worthy of a boycoutt.

 

Your right, I agree with you're suggestion.

Vieira/Viera would have the same problem.
Link to post
Share on other sites

completely flipped, want Vieira now

 

Yep.  The potential benefits of the appointment far outway the risks imo.

 

He was as a fantastic leader on the pitch, hard as nails and commanded respect.  No reason that he couldn't bring the same qualities as head coach.  Having such a well known figurehead would surely make NUFC a more attractive proposistion for players this summer. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Vieira would be an unmitigated disaster. He's headstrong/principled, unproven and short-term. No thanks.

 

Think he's exciting personally. Unproven could mean it all, rather that than getting someone who will always have us in a mediocre position. Obviously wouldn't be my first choice if I could pick whoever, but from the options so far I'd like to see him given a go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Vieira would be an unmitigated disaster. He's headstrong/principled, unproven and short-term. No thanks.

 

Surely he can't be worse than Carver?

Probably not like, but I don't think we should be appointing people on the basis of them being better than Carver :lol: I'd send in my own CV if we were

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Vieira would be an unmitigated disaster. He's headstrong/principled, unproven and short-term. No thanks.

 

Think he's exciting personally. Unproven could mean it all, rather that than getting someone who will always have us in a mediocre position. Obviously wouldn't be my first choice if I could pick whoever, but from the options so far I'd like to see him given a go.

:thup: I wouldn't mind taking a chance on him

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Vieira would be an unmitigated disaster. He's headstrong/principled, unproven and short-term. No thanks.

 

Surely he can't be worse than Carver?

 

Probably not, but if we think like that, it's mission accomplished for Ashley imo. We shouldn't be satisfied with the least worst option.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Vieira would be an unmitigated disaster. He's headstrong/principled, unproven and short-term. No thanks.

 

Surely he can't be worse than Carver?

 

Oh shut up, man. Nobody came close to suggesting he'd be worse than Carver.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And that's half the issue. He knows his worth as a man. The first time Ashley/Charnley tell him a fib he'll be off (and rightly so) and we'll be left with that horrible retard complete with farcical Bobby impersonation managing the team.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...