Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think he prefers the 4-2-3-1 because in his mind it's more defensively solid.  You've got 2 DMs in there and the 3 tracking back behind the ball too.  Unfortunately it leaves Cisse isolated up front and our side fairly toothless.

 

If Jonas is one of the 3 then we have 8 out of 11 players whose primary role or quality is defence.

 

If you play 4321 then the striker has to be like a bull or pacey...Cisse is neither.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who knows, maybe we'll have that lucky lucky season with no injuries, no long cup runs, big teams who have an off day while playing us, little teams just playing like little teams against without those 10/10 goalkeeper performances and yes, that bit of magic and we'll end up in the top 5 again.

 

Would be interesting how the forum would react. Return of Pardiola? :lol:

 

 

 

Realistically, he's gone by November and we'll see Kinnear vs. Mourinho there the first day of the month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's an unbelievable quote from Pardew  :lol:

tbh I'm not so sure its all that uncommon a view among managers and owners in England, few sides have ever bothered to take it seriously, its just perceived as getting in the way since it doesn't have the financial rewards to really make it worthwhile see also cups; FA and League

Link to post
Share on other sites

These were his quotes from that season ticket pullout in the Journal today.

 

 

 

 

http://i43.tinypic.com/2db5qht.jpg

 

http://i44.tinypic.com/16c036a.jpg

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest bimpy474

The Pardew on tactics bit at the bottom. That's sounds just like Souness when he was here. Yes we need to create more chances, but a formation that frees up your better players is vital. Forget 4-4-2 or 4-5-1 !!. We can't Alan because whatever one you use, it's so defensive we fail to create the more chances you say we need to. One is negating the other you plank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thing is, if we're honest. Anita hasn't looked like a EPL holding midfielder, Marveaux hasn't looked like a player who can bother his arse for 90 mins and we've all seen Gouffran run out of puff after 70 mins.

 

Now that's just sweeping generalisation bollocks. Anita has hardly played, and when he has, he hasn't played his usual role. Marveaux gets dropped every time he has a decent game. As Bimpy said, Gouffran never played past the 70 minute mark.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create more chances and score more goals?

 

Might help if you let the team play higher up the pitch and not allow the main striker to be isolated 24/7.

 

When Cisse arrived at the club it wasn't just the 4-3-3 that keeps getting mentioned it was the mindset the team had and how many players we had forward when in possession.

 

Cisse constantly scored goals because he consistently had Ben Arfa, Ba and Cabaye within 10 yards of him giving him passes in and around the box.

 

For some reason Pardew went away from it as soon as we lost a game.

 

We actually have better players now, but unfortunately we have a manager who is scared of his own shadow and won't allow them to get forward in numbers to score goals.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thing is, if we're honest. Anita hasn't looked like a EPL holding midfielder, Marveaux hasn't looked like a player who can bother his arse for 90 mins and we've all seen Gouffran run out of puff after 70 mins.

 

Now that's just sweeping generalisation bollocks. Anita has hardly played, and when he has, he hasn't played his usual role. Marveaux gets dropped every time he has a decent game. As Bimpy said, Gouffran never played past the 70 minute mark.

 

Anita is not and never will be a PL holding mid. Marveaux is absolute quality but goes missing far too ofen. Gouffran fades badly, but not enough to warrant his lack of minutes compared to Jonas.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Haris Vuckic

Thing is, if we're honest. Anita hasn't looked like a EPL holding midfielder, Marveaux hasn't looked like a player who can bother his arse for 90 mins and we've all seen Gouffran run out of puff after 70 mins.

 

Yep.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create more chances and score more goals?

 

Might help if you let the team play higher up the pitch and not allow the main striker to be isolated 24/7.

 

When Cisse arrived at the club it wasn't just the 4-3-3 that keeps getting mentioned it was the mindset the team had and how many players we had forward when in possession.

 

Cisse constantly scored goals because he consistently had Ben Arfa, Ba and Cabaye within 10 yards of him giving him passes in and around the box.

 

For some reason Pardew went away from it as soon as we lost a game.

 

We actually have better players now, but unfortunately we have a manager who is scared of his own shadow and won't allow them to get forward in numbers to score goals.

 

 

 

Too much prozone/prozac take your pick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm always hearing this about Marveaux going missing, don't see how he's had enough minutes on the pitch to decide that.  Plus some of the players that have been on the pitch in his place have largely veered from shit to anonymous in their performances, so comparatively there's not much difference except Marv hardly plays.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thing is, if we're honest. Anita hasn't looked like a EPL holding midfielder, Marveaux hasn't looked like a player who can bother his arse for 90 mins and we've all seen Gouffran run out of puff after 70 mins.

 

Now that's just sweeping generalisation bollocks. Anita has hardly played, and when he has, he hasn't played his usual role. Marveaux gets dropped every time he has a decent game. As Bimpy said, Gouffran never played past the 70 minute mark.

 

Anita is not and never will be a PL holding mid. Marveaux is absolute quality but goes missing far too ofen. Gouffran fades badly, but not enough to warrant his lack of minutes compared to Jonas.

 

I disagree on Anita..... Arteta and Britton seem fine but i'll let that one go.

 

As for Marveaux bit hard to be consistent when you are hardly ever starting and as for Gouffran with Remy's signing he shouldn't be starting so i don't see it as an major issue at least as big as it was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thing is, if we're honest. Anita hasn't looked like a EPL holding midfielder, Marveaux hasn't looked like a player who can bother his arse for 90 mins and we've all seen Gouffran run out of puff after 70 mins.

 

Yep.

 

Gouffran will get fitter, the part about Marveaux is weapons grade bull shit. He hasn't been given a decent run of games to get match fit and looks far from lazy. And whatever type of player Anita looks, he's a better footballer than Tiote and should have had his place from last Christmas onwards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...