Guest Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Eating people. So fuck off Luis Suarez, You eat people's torsos You're a cannibal, cannibal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleBingo Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 They had to have known man, had to!!! And if they didn't they did their utmost to avoid finding out. After what came out last week about how he said at the time of his arrest he thought she was 16 they must have known that something had actually happened and as she was under age they would surely have put two and two together. But ignored it and played him anyway. I'm adamant they knew what had happened. There should be an FA investigation. They almost certainly knew he was guilty, this is from a legal fella I know......"SAFC would have had copies of the advice from Counsel (Orlando Pownall QC is a big, big cheese in crime) and copies of the prosecution evidence once he was charged. They will have known the content of the whatsapp messages straightaway." They knew and played him to save themselves, which is utterly despicable in my opinion, and you're right, the FA should investigate it. The classy cunts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shintonsghost Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 jesus another thread from this obsessed nut http://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/another-point-caught-up-on-norwich-newcastle.1190577/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 My Mackem cousin. Bit of a kernt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 jesus another thread from this obsessed nut http://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/another-point-caught-up-on-norwich-newcastle.1190577/ Another point caught up?, less than a month before they were above us Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 They're going pure radge on that Johnson thread now, watch your letterbox marra, it's amazing the amount of infighting on there. Arguing on the technicality of him not being a paedo based on the definition of the word. Nonce is a nonce. http://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/our-recent-derby-wins.1201922/page-8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crumpy Gunt Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 this Reiver bloke is a bit obsessed with us mind, i don't look at the mackems sites much but ive noticed this thick fu##er is always banging on about us, do they ever talk about anything else other than us on there ffs http://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/seriously-is-tufty-unstable.1201031/ what a clip on that site He's one of those hard fuckers / billy liars (take your pick) who on derby day will enter a Newcastle city centre pub in his full red and white regalia and he'll claim everyone in there will be to scared to fight him. Only the sad cunts believe anything he says. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 They had to have known man, had to!!! And if they didn't they did their utmost to avoid finding out. After what came out last week about how he said at the time of his arrest he thought she was 16 they must have known that something had actually happened and as she was under age they would surely have put two and two together. But ignored it and played him anyway. I'm adamant they knew what had happened. There should be an FA investigation. They almost certainly knew he was guilty, this is from a legal fella I know......"SAFC would have had copies of the advice from Counsel (Orlando Pownall QC is a big, big cheese in crime) and copies of the prosecution evidence once he was charged. They will have known the content of the whatsapp messages straightaway." They knew and played him to save themselves, which is utterly despicable in my opinion, and you're right, the FA should investigate it. The classy cunts. Would they have all that though? Strictly speaking they're nothing to do with this case, it's a matter between the crown and Johnson. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
baby got back Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 The club would not have had access to the evidence, until it started being broadcast over the internet at start of the trial. From the CPS The presumption of innocence and the rights of the accused Suspects who are prosecuted are entitled to have their guilt or innocence established with all the safeguards of a criminal trial, including the rules of evidence. Those who are not prosecuted, or who are acquitted, are entitled to the presumption of innocence. The presumption of innocence can only be undermined if the CPS or police were to release evidence enabling individuals to trawl through it to determine why the person was suspected in the first place. This is an important constitutional principle closely linked with the Service's independence of decision making. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
baby got back Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 New page ffs, shoulda stayed lurking. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elliottman Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 They had to have known man, had to!!! And if they didn't they did their utmost to avoid finding out. After what came out last week about how he said at the time of his arrest he thought she was 16 they must have known that something had actually happened and as she was under age they would surely have put two and two together. But ignored it and played him anyway. I'm adamant they knew what had happened. There should be an FA investigation. They almost certainly knew he was guilty, this is from a legal fella I know......"SAFC would have had copies of the advice from Counsel (Orlando Pownall QC is a big, big cheese in crime) and copies of the prosecution evidence once he was charged. They will have known the content of the whatsapp messages straightaway." They knew and played him to save themselves, which is utterly despicable in my opinion, and you're right, the FA should investigate it. The classy c***s. Would they have all that though? Strictly speaking they're nothing to do with this case, it's a matter between the crown and Johnson. Yeah I don't see what safc would have access.to counsel opinion when they've got no involvement at in the case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleBingo Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 They had to have known man, had to!!! And if they didn't they did their utmost to avoid finding out. After what came out last week about how he said at the time of his arrest he thought she was 16 they must have known that something had actually happened and as she was under age they would surely have put two and two together. But ignored it and played him anyway. I'm adamant they knew what had happened. There should be an FA investigation. They almost certainly knew he was guilty, this is from a legal fella I know......"SAFC would have had copies of the advice from Counsel (Orlando Pownall QC is a big, big cheese in crime) and copies of the prosecution evidence once he was charged. They will have known the content of the whatsapp messages straightaway." They knew and played him to save themselves, which is utterly despicable in my opinion, and you're right, the FA should investigate it. The classy c***s. Would they have all that though? Strictly speaking they're nothing to do with this case, it's a matter between the crown and Johnson. Basically if an employee is charged with a child sexual offence, then there is procedure to follow for the employers. As a football club would have children of all ages on it's premises, they have a duty to consider there being any further risk of him reoffending while on bail. That is why in most cases like this, the employee would be suspended pending the outcome, simply to be on the safe side. Most SAFC fans seem to think that the club would simply ask him if he was guilty, he denies it, and they carry on, innocent until proven guilty and all that. However there's more to it than that. The club need to investigate further to see if they aren't putting children at risk, their legal people must have spoken to him, social services and the police. They would also have had to look into the CPS case itself and as my legal friend has said, they would have known the details of the case and the evidence against him. If they didn't do this, they were negligent themselves. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 Rtg's thread about their derby victories being tarnished has thrown up some surprising views........... or maybe not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tisd09 Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 http://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/our-recent-derby-wins.1201922/ Will you still look back on a certain persons goals as fondly as you did previously? Genuine question that I'm interested to know peoples feelings about. Simple yes or no answers will do to. To fukin right. It hurts me when I watch them tho, i still want AJ lining up on March 20th! Is this a massive whoosh or something??? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 http://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/toontastic-dont-ask-me-why-but.1202228/ Iv just had a look on a Newcastle forum called Toontastic ( what a terrible name for starters ) and they have a whole thread dedicated to just us lovely folk on here Wow, a whole thread Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 He says as he creates a whole thread dedicated to Toontastic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 If Steven Taylor was outed as a nonce I think Sunderland message boards would melt down. As it is we're fine because he's more likely to be a serial killer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy2Sheds Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 7 pages on a thread about McClaren keeping his job (Chronicle poll).This is one of the many reason why they get called sad Mackem bastards. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sho Time Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 If Steven Taylor was outed as a nonce I think Sunderland message boards would melt down. As it is we're fine because he's more likely to be a serial killer. No chance, he'd do his ACL creeping up on a potential victim. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 Tbf, their pages all have about 3 posts each. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 http://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/toontastic-dont-ask-me-why-but.1202228/ Iv just had a look on a Newcastle forum called Toontastic ( what a terrible name for starters ) and they have a whole thread dedicated to just us lovely folk on here Wow, a whole thread This guy knows: Do you not think it makes more sense to have one thread about them rather than the 40 or so that are started on this board on a daily basis? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 They had to have known man, had to!!! And if they didn't they did their utmost to avoid finding out. After what came out last week about how he said at the time of his arrest he thought she was 16 they must have known that something had actually happened and as she was under age they would surely have put two and two together. But ignored it and played him anyway. I'm adamant they knew what had happened. There should be an FA investigation. They almost certainly knew he was guilty, this is from a legal fella I know......"SAFC would have had copies of the advice from Counsel (Orlando Pownall QC is a big, big cheese in crime) and copies of the prosecution evidence once he was charged. They will have known the content of the whatsapp messages straightaway." They knew and played him to save themselves, which is utterly despicable in my opinion, and you're right, the FA should investigate it. The classy c***s. Would they have all that though? Strictly speaking they're nothing to do with this case, it's a matter between the crown and Johnson. Basically if an employee is charged with a child sexual offence, then there is procedure to follow for the employers. As a football club would have children of all ages on it's premises, they have a duty to consider there being any further risk of him reoffending while on bail. That is why in most cases like this, the employee would be suspended pending the outcome, simply to be on the safe side. Most SAFC fans seem to think that the club would simply ask him if he was guilty, he denies it, and they carry on, innocent until proven guilty and all that. However there's more to it than that. The club need to investigate further to see if they aren't putting children at risk, their legal people must have spoken to him, social services and the police. They would also have had to look into the CPS case itself and as my legal friend has said, they would have known the details of the case and the evidence against him. If they didn't do this, they were negligent themselves. I think at the very least they have turned a blind eye to this. If the CPS are pushing for prosecution you can bet they have good grounds for doing so. Sunderland have stuck their fingers in their ears and shouted 'la la la la can't hear anything' over the entire duration until he admitted to it. My view is that they did know and played him anyway, I cannot believe otherwise, it seems incomprehensible that they would not have had doubts at least. They kept playing him for one reason, he is one of their best players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 There has been a few raised eyebrows on the jury bench as the jury of eight women and four men leaf through a series of photos of Johnson from his mobile phone, including one of his “groin area”. Dr Hunton is being asked about some web history entries from the defendant's phone. These entries were made only a few days after his second meeting with the girl. One of these web history entries confirms that a Google search for "legal age of consent" was carried out, Dr Hunton has said. The second entry was a web page which was clicked on as part of the Google search. It was an article on the legal age of consent around the world by The Mirror. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 Cause always roll out I was writing a book defence of Pete Townsend Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 DC Walton said that Johnson then asked to speak to Stacey Flounders about why he was being arrested. His girlfriend asked him, "who is she?" Johnson then told his girlfriend the girl's name and said again: "I just gave her a few shirts." Stacey then asked Johnson how old the girl was. Johnson said: "Well she said she was 16." busted Whatsapp messages have him saying "that's ages lol" to her saying when she's 16 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts