samptime29 Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 I was in mackem land today and saw a few people wearing AJ tops, one being a lass. I was shocked. I would have taken a photo had I not been driving. At the Retro Game Festival last year at Gateshead Stadium, I saw a kid of about 12 singing Lost Prophets on Rock band on the big screen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-3470148/Sunderland-stuck-Adam-Johnson-avoid-relegation-winger-admitted-child-sex-offences.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
newsted Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Well let's get the fucker sent down first, then see how they try to explain themselves out of this one. She's going to take the fall, I reckon, and they'll see her alright. £££. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 The fans have wanted her out for ages though, so it's a win-win. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Their statement will be an absolute rebuttal of the defence accusations, it can't really be anything else. Be interesting to see how they squirm out of it though. Margaret Byrne will be hung from the city walls and it will all be her fault, nicely brushed under the mackem carpet. The fans and Ready to Groom will agree with the club's position and all will be well with the classy club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shintonsghost Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 ugly fucker mind isnt she Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattypnufc Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Their statement will be an absolute rebuttal of the defence accusations, it can't really be anything else. Be interesting to see how they squirm out of it though. Margaret Byrne will be hung from the city walls and it will all be her fault, nicely brushed under the mackem carpet. The fans and Ready to Groom will agree with the club's position and all will be well with the classy club. What city walls? Its nothing more than a shitty town man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Their statement will be an absolute rebuttal of the defence accusations, it can't really be anything else. Be interesting to see how they squirm out of it though. Margaret Byrne will be hung from the city walls and it will all be her fault, nicely brushed under the mackem carpet. The fans and Ready to Groom will agree with the club's position and all will be well with the classy club. What city walls? Its nothing more than a shitty town man. Aye fair point, figure of speech. Hung from the chicken wire fence might be more apt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Judge is a Geordie na nar na nar. Or just a reasonable human being. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shintonsghost Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 think today is the day like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 So that whole "I had to be there by 6" argument was bullshit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomson Mouse Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Their statement will be an absolute rebuttal of the defence accusations, it can't really be anything else. Be interesting to see how they squirm out of it though. Margaret Byrne will be hung from the city walls and it will all be her fault, nicely brushed under the mackem carpet. The fans and Ready to Groom will agree with the club's position and all will be well with the classy club. What city walls? Its nothing more than a shitty town man. Aye fair point, figure of speech. Hung from the chicken wire fence might be more apt Understand what you're saying but can't buy that she was told about it and no-one else knew. Pretty sure the bill mentioned that others knew about it within the the club? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookie1892 Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 jurys retired... judge said they need a 12-0 to convict him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 100% not guilty then Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Oh well, he's definitely getting away with it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Dunno like, isn't it often the case that some of the more forthright jurors make a decision and everyone else tends to go along with it? Especially if your verdict would end up overturning what nearly everyone else thinks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Lucky that he's got former teammate Danny as judge for his case Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveItIfWeBeatU Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Even if he's found not guilty of these 2 charges, the 2 charges he has already pleaded guilty to have ended his career and mean he'll have to keep a low profile. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonpack Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 So a club sends a fax late or forgets to sign a page correctly and sanctions are applied if the player involved plays, yet a club knowingly plays a player, self confessed as guilty of a serious criminal offence (short of murder what's actually worse than sexual activity with a child) and nowt'll happen, not even disrepute. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Presumably when he is found not guilty of the second two sunderland will re sign him? Afterall, they played him for a year when they knew he was guilt of the first two charges. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shintonsghost Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 jury out, judge needs a 12-0 majority. hmmm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 So a club sends a fax late or forgets to sign a page correctly and sanctions are applied if the player involved plays, yet a club knowingly plays a player, self confessed as guilty of a serious criminal offence (short of murder what's actually worse than sexual activity with a child) and nowt'll happen, not even disrepute. Nope I don't think so. One is an infringement of the laws of the game and the other an infringement of the laws of the land. For example had Cantona drop kicked someone in the chippy queue he would not have been banned from playing football. Or if Suarez had bitten his next door neighbour he wouldn't be banned from playing football but as they did it on the pitch they were charged with transgressing the laws of football. I doubt there is much that can be done other than worldwide condemnation of the club for persisting with a child molester to save them from relegation Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonpack Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 So a club sends a fax late or forgets to sign a page correctly and sanctions are applied if the player involved plays, yet a club knowingly plays a player, self confessed as guilty of a serious criminal offence (short of murder what's actually worse than sexual activity with a child) and nowt'll happen, not even disrepute. Nope I don't think so. One is an infringement of the laws of the game and the other an infringement of the laws of the land. For example had Cantona drop kicked someone in the chippy queue he would not have been banned from playing football. Or if Suarez had bitten his next door neighbour he wouldn't be banned from playing football but as they did it on the pitch they were charged with transgressing the laws of football. I doubt there is much that can be done other than worldwide condemnation of the club for persisting with a child molester to save them from relegation I know, nowt will get done, but Johnson's/SAFC's actions unlike those of Cantona in the chippy, or Suarez having his neighbour as a buffet, directly affected the competition. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 But didn't transgress the laws of football Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts