Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest firetotheworks

I think it does like, I said it before even though it's obviously not worse it just sounds far more noncey. Kissing little girls.

 

This one's for you Hans. I read a report the other day* about another case where it mentioned that 'it has been claimed that when the accused approached the victim's foof, he arrived in his trousers.'

 

 

*No I didn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it does like, I said it before even though it's obviously not worse it just sounds far more noncey. Kissing little girls.

 

This one's for you Hans. I read a report the other day* about another case where it mentioned that 'it has been claimed that when the accused approached the victim's foof, he arrived in his trousers.'

 

 

*No I didn't.

:lol: it's proper vile talk, I cannot stand stuff like 'pass wind' either.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

I think it does like, I said it before even though it's obviously not worse it just sounds far more noncey. Kissing little girls.

 

This one's for you Hans. I read a report the other day* about another case where it mentioned that 'it has been claimed that when the accused approached the victim's foof, he arrived in his trousers.'

 

 

*No I didn't.

:lol: it's proper vile talk, I cannot stand stuff like 'pass wind' either.

 

I hate literally every word for that happening.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been told Adidas are pulling out of the shirt deal with Sunderland, not sure how true this is mind.

 

Can't see any other kit manufacturers touching them if that's the case, they'll have to start making their own nonce kits in-house.

 

They'll get Bukta.

I've heard Fila.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

Just been told Adidas are pulling out of the shirt deal with Sunderland, not sure how true this is mind.

 

Can't see any other kit manufacturers touching them if that's the case, they'll have to start making their own nonce kits in-house.

 

They'll get Bukta.

I've heard Fila.

 

 

 

:giggs:

Link to post
Share on other sites

His ex-girlfriend might be in line for some for some compensation. Quite canny of her to stand by him until he was convicted, suffering the shame publicly will surely make her case stronger for the settlement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"So, we hear you like to harbour nonces? Fancy hosting an England game?"

Perfect opportunity to bring Stuart Hall back to FiveLive. When in Rome and all that noncesense.

 

:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I once had to go into Frankland to do a little job, very strange feeling inside a jail - as an innocent coward....

 

I saw Albert Dryden, the guy who shot a council official that was trying to get his house knocked down after he built it in the middle of nowhere up near to Consett without planning permission.  He looked very sad and lonely....

Link to post
Share on other sites

He must have a few million or at least a few hundred thousand in the bank or invested though surely?

Can his lass not go after him for some of that for the bairn?

 

I don't know, maybe we should consult savvywoman?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I once had to go into Frankland to do a little job, very strange feeling inside a jail - as an innocent coward....

 

I saw Albert Dryden, the guy who shot a council official that was trying to get his house knocked down after he built it in the middle of nowhere up near to Consett without planning permission.  He looked very sad and lonely....

 

Good mate of mine, use to be a prison officer there. He had to supervise Peter Tobin (the prick who murdered women and buried them under patios), among others.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I once had to go into Frankland to do a little job, very strange feeling inside a jail - as an innocent coward....

 

I saw Albert Dryden, the guy who shot a council official that was trying to get his house knocked down after he built it in the middle of nowhere up near to Consett without planning permission.  He looked very sad and lonely....

 

Good mate of mine, use to be a prison officer there. He had to supervise Peter Tobin (the prick who murdered women and buried them under patios), among others.

 

Did he get mates rates on a new gravel drive,?

Link to post
Share on other sites

His ex-girlfriend might be in line for some for some compensation. Quite canny of her to stand by him until he was convicted, suffering the shame publicly will surely make her case stronger for the settlement.

 

She probably won't be entitled to anything but child support. That is based on income and would be a maximum of £15,000 per year, but would probably be next to nothing as he no longer has an income.

 

Apparently, she's from a pretty wealthy background anyway. Whatever reason she had for standing by him, it probably wasn't money.

Considering he's the father of a child with her he'll possibly willingly give her plenty of money. He'll have multiple millions. He supposedly earned just under £3m alone since being charged a year ago. He'll have to make what he's got now last the rest of his life but considering a Premiership footballer makes more in a year than most of us will in our whole life I'm sure he'll manage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read that Sun story this morning. It's total speculation. It's unlikely he would be in the same security category to make him go to Frankland. More chance he will end up on the specialist nonce wing at HMP Northumberland, unless he gets whacked with the full ten years........

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mackem on the radio saying Sunderland's hand were tied - they couldnt sack him because it was pre-judging guilt. Then if he was found not guilty, they sacked an innocent man.

 

Also saying everyone is sexist and can't deal with the fact Margaret Byrne is a woman :lol:  Oh and the media are a disgrace for the way they're going after Sunderland

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mackem on the radio saying Sunderland's hand were tied - they couldnt sack him because it was pre-judging guilt. Then if he was found not guilty, they sacked an innocent man.

 

Also saying everyone is sexist and can't deal with the fact Margaret Byrne is a woman :lol:  Oh and the media are a disgrace for the way they're going after Sunderland

 

Suspension is not viewed as a punishment and therefore Sunderland would have done nothing wrong by keeping him suspended.

 

The issue is not because they didn't sack him, the issue is un-suspending him and playing him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...