Jump to content

Paul Dummett


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Dokko said:

 

If he could be fit for 75% of the season then aye. But it's more like 25% and it's a waste of a squad place especially in the summer when we can go and get players who are not always broken. 

 

Exactly this. I don't have that much of a problem with his abilities, he's no world beater but can do a job as a stand in. But why would you want to hand out another contract to an ageing, injury prone player?

Link to post
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, gbandit said:

has almost never put in a really poor defensive performance. 

 

I'm not going to fact check that, but my gut feeling is that this is re-writing history. I'm sure he's had a lot of woeful performances, even defensively. Had a good little spell under Rafa, and a few games under Bruce but other than that his defensive qualities has mostly been judged on the odd admittedly impressive recovery run and subsequent sliding tackle, literally the only redeeming quality he has, and now he's not even doing that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I trust Howe's judgement, but right now I'd need to see an improvement to justify it. He may just be rusty after such a long time out, but even then, he was very much a defensive fullback with minimal attacking output. That's fine when playing with ASM, but right now I'm hoping Targett plays the rest of the season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We're probably going to struggle to shift some of our deadwood this summer who are still contracted - the likes of Dummett who are actually out of contract (while also not good enough and always injured) should surely be first out the door.

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, HUGZ said:

might sound harsh, but I fucking hate him (as a footballer, not as a person) and can't wait until he gets peddled :lol: him being our benchmark is a big reason Matt Targett looked like prime Cafu on his debut.

 

He's never, ever been good enough. people argue he's a good defender, and does the fundamentals well, but he's shit scared of the ball, has zero technique and offers no attacking threat whatsoever. because he's so limited he gets held to the lowest possible standard, the opposite of someone like ASM, basically. not to mention he's a perma crock.

 

thanks for everything Paul, but down to the Champo you go son. Bruce will probably sign him. which says everything you need to know.

 

100% this :clap: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would never have thought about extending his contract without a takeover. The thought of spending decent money to upgrade on him is automatic. It's little shit like this that just starts to gently stir a few doubts about Howe's judgement if he's even thinking about doing this.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

All 3 of those tipped to get new contracts won't he playing a huge amount of league football next season I don't think.

 

Next season they will add depth and experience into a squad that will be made up of alot of players from abroad who have never played in the Premier League. They'll get alot of minutes in Cup competitions and if we are in dire need Die to injuries.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shelvey and Schar have shown to be more than useful under Howe so them getting a new contract makes sense 

 

Dummett if he wasn't always injured wouldn't be bad to have around but we know he's guaranteed an injury 

 

It could as someone suggested just be a tactic of Howe to ensure the squad is united until the end of the season

 

I like Dummett but him getting a new contract isn't a sign of progression 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Geordie Ahmed said:

Shelvey and Schar have shown to be more than useful under Howe so them getting a new contract makes sense 

 

Dummett if he wasn't always injured wouldn't be bad to have around but we know he's guaranteed an injury 

 

It could as someone suggested just be a tactic of Howe to ensure the squad is united until the end of the season

 

I like Dummett but him getting a new contract isn't a sign of progression 


Don’t think Shelvey makes sense imo, when he has another year left after this one. If he’s still performing ok next Christmas time then fair enough. He’s been here years and has been total shit for most of that time, so has to do a level performance over a much longer period to convince me. 
 

No chance in hell would I give Dummett a new contract, as not only is he an injury liability, he’s also a pretty average premier league player. As I mentioned in another thread, it’s an Edwards article, so take with a pinch of salt anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...