Fuzzy Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Whats that got to do with it? The club has money ffs Also has a massive debt to MA, to which MA controls. Why would he allow it to be used for transfers when we cant (well can, but very unlikely) go down? He could easily take it off the debt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Over 11 years ago like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Imagine finally sacking off Shola in the summer and the replacement being Carlton Cole No way will he pass the medical. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Whats that got to do with it? The club has money ffs Also has a massive debt to MA, to which MA controls. Why would he allow it to be used for transfers when we cant (well can, but very unlikely) go down? He could easily take it off the debt. Ignoring the fact he has repeatedly said it wont come off the debt. None of that has anything to do with Ashley putting money in? The club is making profits, we spend fuck all to start with of course it can pay out money without further help from Ashley Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 http://www.espn.co.uk/football/sport/story/271795.html Long and McGeady Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/bafetimbi-gomis-deal-would-cost-6474144 Bafetimbi Gomis deal would cost Newcastle United £1million in agent fees 7 Jan 2014 07:11 Newcastle United have cooled their interest in Bafetimbi Gomis – despite the player making it clear that a move to Tyneside this January still interests him Newcastle United have cooled their interest in Bafetimbi Gomis – despite the player making it clear that a move to Tyneside this January still interests him. United came close to an agreement for the 28-year-old last summer only for the move to be complicated by agent fees and late interest from Marseille, which eventually saw the deal collapse and the player staying put at Lyon. And although Gomis has been offered around clubs once again during the January transfer window, Newcastle have been put off by the demands of the players’ representatives with an agent fee of around £1m the demand for the deal from Lyon to Newcastle. The hefty sum is thought to be a major factor in Newcastle’s bid last summer and could hinder his hopes of a Premier League move again this time around. Gomis has Mondial Promotion listed as his representatives, the same group that represent Marseille’s Andre Ayew and ex-Chelsea striker Didier Drogba. Both the Magpies and Lyon agreed a knockdown fee last summer for Gomis with his current contract about to come an end in six months. Any potential transfer fee would be likely to reduced again this winter, but United are understood to be relaxed about the situation as they have other targets on their list and Gomis is not a priority. Also on Newcastle’s hit-list is out of sorts striker Luuk De Jong of Borussia Monchengladbach with the 23-year-old available for a loan deal. A temporary switch would also be the deal on the table for Demba Ba of Chelsea. The Magpies haven’t ruled out his return but were quoted around £3million for a loan switch last summer for the whole season. The Blues would offer a reduced fee for a loan switch for the second half of the campaign and Jose Mourinho will not stand in his way if he wants to return to the North East. French teenage left-back Nathan Dekoke of St Etienne is another player on United’s list, but the 17-year-old would be pooled straight into the development squad under Wille Donachie and Dave Watson with a four-year deal mooted in France. United remain eager to hold on to their star players in January but Alan Pardew has already described Newcastle as “hard sellers” this window and should they receive a substantial offer for the likes of Yohan Cabaye or Hatem Ben Arfa, they are unlikely to turn it down. But Pardew has been told he does not have to sell to buy in this window and has had assurances that he will be given money to spend. Payments made by Barclays Premier League clubs to agents between October 2012 and September 2013: 1. Chelsea: £13,721,721 2. Manchester City: £11,179,817 3. Tottenham: £9,787,676 4. Liverpool: £9,400,973 5. Newcastle: £7,294,018 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzzy Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Whats that got to do with it? The club has money ffs Also has a massive debt to MA, to which MA controls. Why would he allow it to be used for transfers when we cant (well can, but very unlikely) go down? He could easily take it off the debt. Ignoring the fact he has repeatedly said it wont come off the debt. None of that has anything to do with Ashley putting money in? The club is making profits, we spend f*** all to start with of course it can pay out money without further help from Ashley Reportedly said. The point i was trying to make is MA will (i guess) see the clubs money as his own. He can take it out when he wants. and how much profit did we make? It's slipped my mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ujpest doza Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Linked with Long in The Mirror. Suits us, 26 with 6 months left on his contract. I'd take him in a heartbeat, very good player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Linked with Long in The Mirror. Suits us, 26 with 6 months left on his contract. I'd take him in a heartbeat, very good player. Like Long - works hard and quick but hoping we can do a bit better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Linked with Long in The Mirror. Suits us, 26 with 6 months left on his contract. I'd take him in a heartbeat, very good player. WBA have another year's option on him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Whats that got to do with it? The club has money ffs Also has a massive debt to MA, to which MA controls. Why would he allow it to be used for transfers when we cant (well can, but very unlikely) go down? He could easily take it off the debt. Ignoring the fact he has repeatedly said it wont come off the debt. None of that has anything to do with Ashley putting money in? The club is making profits, we spend f*** all to start with of course it can pay out money without further help from Ashley Reportedly said. The point i was trying to make is MA will (i guess) see the clubs money as his own. He can take it out when he wants. and how much profit did we make? It's slipped my mind. No its been repeatedly said in the accounts and by his previous mouthpiece Llambias that his money stays there til a sale. The fact you still use 'i guess' while claiming to know how he thinks says it all. The current accounts arent released yet so we dont know the exact figures but we can bet its up from last year(and will be even higher next year) Either way you are wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Long isn't great but is better than Shola & arguably Cisse currently so Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Long isn't great but is better than Shola & arguably Cisse currently so You just know Pardew will play Shola ahead of Long though. For that reason I rather we get someone who can hold the ball up front and replace Shola's role in the side. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Whats that got to do with it? The club has money ffs Also has a massive debt to MA, to which MA controls. Why would he allow it to be used for transfers when we cant (well can, but very unlikely) go down? He could easily take it off the debt. Ignoring the fact he has repeatedly said it wont come off the debt. None of that has anything to do with Ashley putting money in? The club is making profits, we spend f*** all to start with of course it can pay out money without further help from Ashley Reportedly said. The point i was trying to make is MA will (i guess) see the clubs money as his own. He can take it out when he wants. and how much profit did we make? It's slipped my mind. You might be right in that we won't spend (though personally I think we'll do so if their's good deals going). But at the end of the day whether we spend or not it has nowt to do with Ashley saying he won't invest in the club anymore. Especially since he's actually put money in since that was said. Of course he got that money back from the club a season or two later, but the point is he is still prepared to put money in, just not prepared to add to the long term interest free loan. Also of course as Roger Kint says the club can generate its own funds. Not sure how much will be spare right now. But certainly when the first Wonga sponsorship payment and increased TV money arrives in a few months time their should be quite a significant excess (£30-£40m?). Anyway the really obvious lie you didn't pick up on was them saying Pardew had been assured he would have money to spend If we do spend anything he won't be the one deciding who its spent on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Varadi Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 http://www.espn.co.uk/football/sport/story/271795.html Long and McGeady Everton favourites for McGeady according to this: http://www.irishpost.co.uk/sport/aiden-mcgeady-close-to-everton-deal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willow Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Imagine finally sacking off Shola in the summer and the replacement being Carlton Cole don't even joke about that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHoob Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 McGeady has looked appaling every time I've seen him play. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 McGeady has looked appaling every time I've seen him play. He reminds me of Duff. All huff and puff and no end product. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxfree Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11685/9104630/transfer-news-west-ham-striker-carlton-cole-has-interest-from-other-clubs However, the likes of Aston Villa, where Cole spent the 2004/05 season on loan, Newcastle United and Queens Park Rangers are all reported to be monitoring his current situation. That's not even funny that like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timeEd32 Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Would take Long in heartbeat. Great option to have. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmk Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 McGeady has looked appaling every time I've seen him play. He reminds me of Duff. All huff and puff and no end product. He was always on the verge of being a quality player but lacked the extra 10%. As you say it is his end product mainly and I think his attitude isn't the best too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 So all this guff from the weekend has turned out to be nowt, massive surprise like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmk Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 McGeady has looked appaling every time I've seen him play. He reminds me of Duff. All huff and puff and no end product. He was always on the verge of being a quality player but lacked the extra 10%. As you say it is his end product mainly and I think his attitude isn't the best too. becoming part of N-O's vernacular. Very true. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
morpeth mag Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 On the verge of becoming part of the vernacular I think Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 In and around the verge as young Townsend would say. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts