Jump to content

Swansea City 3 - 0 Newcastle United - 04/12/13 - post-match reaction from p37


Recommended Posts

Poor for long stretches but the "no strikers and they scored 3 argh its so embarrassing" thing doesn't really wash.

 

First goal: utter howler from Krul.

 

Second goal: miracle of an OG

 

Third goal: howler from Krul. Guy who scored shouldn't be on the pitch.

 

Webb gave us absolutely nothing. We've had similar levels of performance in other games and come away with points. By far my biggest gripe is how they absolutely packed it in after the second goal. Shameful.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest palnese

Why did Swansea score just before half time and then come out still trying to play football? Why didn't they batten down the hatches and give us the ball?

 

Time to come up with something new. This is getting rather boring.

 

Is he wrong ?

 

Not at all, but there are posts like that every day on here. It's not funny anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why did Swansea score just before half time and then come out still trying to play football? Why didn't they batten down the hatches and give us the ball?

 

Time to come up with something new. This is getting rather boring.

 

You're telling me. Pig sick of it, have been for three years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that i've had some time to get some perspective, im content again :)

 

I looked at the table and realised it ain't too bad, however think Champs league has gone for us once more

 

Not sure if serious???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest bimpy474

Why did Swansea score just before half time and then come out still trying to play football? Why didn't they batten down the hatches and give us the ball?

 

Time to come up with something new. This is getting rather boring.

 

Is he wrong ?

 

Not at all, but there are posts like that every day on here. It's not funny anymore.

 

Not sure Wullie finds it funny, probably sick to death of seeing it happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest palnese

Why did Swansea score just before half time and then come out still trying to play football? Why didn't they batten down the hatches and give us the ball?

 

Time to come up with something new. This is getting rather boring.

 

You're telling me. Pig sick of it, have been for three years.

 

:thup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

A result like that was always going to around the corner.  Not massively concerned as I don't believe we can finish in the top 7 any-case.

 

We can though Neesy. We definitely have the team to. Whether we do is another matter.

 

1st 11 yes, squad not a chance.

 

The depth we have in the centerbacks and strikers isn't great, but how many teams have 2 good players in every position outside the top 5? Very debatable as to what our best 11 should be anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kneejerk opinion time:

 

Judging Swansea by the handful of games I've seen:

 

Swansea have p*ss poor-to-average players who are simply coached exceptionally well in a style of play that makes them significantly greater than the sum of their parts. They play moderately attacking, penetrative, creative football with surprisingly smart linkup and quick, confident interchanging between the entire team, allowing complex team moves to build. Their points come from being effective as a team.

 

Judging us by the past few years:

 

We have average-to-good players who are coached exceptionally poorly in a style of play that makes us significantly less than the sum of our parts. We play dull, defensive, workman-like football with minimal linkup play and interchanging that is usually limited to two players passing it between themselves a couple of times at most, leading to very basic "team moves" that inevitably results in a hopeful, blind punt into the penalty box. Our points come from those good players capable of regularly putting in excellent performances here and there and a reliance on the opposition being consistently s***/wasteful in the final third.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pards is s***. End of story.

 

I could understand him ditching the 4-3-3 previously, as it was a formation you never felt was his thing.

 

But the 4-4-2? That we were just settling so well into? Why the f*** would he do that? After 5 mins?

 

 

 

Probably because Swansea were over running tiote and cabaye and we needed more numbers, not that it worked

 

It did actually work while it was 1-0.... we were getting on top and should have had a penalty they go down the other end and score an incredibly jammy goal.

 

After that it was over, as we all know no Pardew side can come back from 2-0.... 4-0 doesn't count. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that i've had some time to get some perspective, im content again :)

 

I looked at the table and realised it ain't too bad, however think Champs league has gone for us once more

 

Not sure if serious???

 

Clearly not :lol: - will finish anywhere between 12th and 9th

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest bimpy474

Common denominator is that we have shipped 5 goals since Colo replaced MYM in the side

 

Very true that.

quite poor goals defensively at that.

 

Is it time to accept he is on a downward spiral. Not just because of the football either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest palnese

Why did Swansea score just before half time and then come out still trying to play football? Why didn't they batten down the hatches and give us the ball?

 

Time to come up with something new. This is getting rather boring.

 

Is he wrong ?

 

Not at all, but there are posts like that every day on here. It's not funny anymore.

 

Not sure Wullie finds it funny, probably sick to death of seeing it happen.

 

Aye, I know, just fucking sick of reading it every fucking day :lol: I've got nowt against Wullie and I understand his frustatration. I think we're all sick of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kneejerk opinion time:

 

Judging Swansea by the handful of games I've seen:

 

Swansea have p*ss poor-to-average players who are simply coached exceptionally well in a style of play that makes them significantly greater than the sum of their parts. They play moderately attacking, penetrative, creative football with surprisingly smart linkup and quick, confident interchanging between the entire team, allowing complex team moves to build. Their points come from being effective as a team.

 

Judging us by the past few years:

 

We have average-to-good players who are coached exceptionally poorly in a style of play that makes us significantly less than the sum of our parts. We play dull, defensive, workman-like football with minimal linkup play and interchanging that is usually limited to two players passing it between themselves a couple of times at most, leading to very basic "team moves" that inevitably results in a hopeful, blind punt into the penalty box. Our points come from those good players capable of regularly putting in excellent performances here and there and a reliance on the opposition being consistently s***/wasteful in the final third.

 

Would say that is an excellent summarisation tbh, nothing kneejerk about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Disapppointed with Krul for the first goal like, a good goalkeeper doesn't make a basic error like that. Caused us to go in a goal down and probably scared Pardew to death. We all know how reliant we are on getting a good foothold in the match and scoring first where possible. Crucial fuckup, that.

 

I don't get people saying 3-0 is harsh though, they dominated the ball, made and scored three goals and forced Krul into a few other saves. What did Vorm really have to do aside from save Remy's header first half? They played well and deserved the comfortable victory. Something we haven't had in fucking ages.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kneejerk opinion time:

 

Judging Swansea by the handful of games I've seen:

 

Swansea have p*ss poor-to-average players who are simply coached exceptionally well in a style of play that makes them significantly greater than the sum of their parts. They play moderately attacking, penetrative, creative football with surprisingly smart linkup and quick, confident interchanging between the entire team, allowing complex team moves to build. Their points come from being effective as a team.

 

Judging us by the past few years:

 

We have average-to-good players who are coached exceptionally poorly in a style of play that makes us significantly less than the sum of our parts. We play dull, defensive, workman-like football with minimal linkup play and interchanging that is usually limited to two players passing it between themselves a couple of times at most, leading to very basic "team moves" that inevitably results in a hopeful, blind punt into the penalty box. Our points come from those good players capable of regularly putting in excellent performances here and there and a reliance on the opposition being consistently s***/wasteful in the final third.

 

 

 

Not worth analysing to that depth.

 

Summed up

 

We was shit

 

They was less shit

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kneejerk opinion time:

 

Judging Swansea by the handful of games I've seen:

 

Swansea have piss poor-to-average players who are simply coached exceptionally well in a style of play that makes them significantly greater than the sum of their parts. They play moderately attacking, penetrative, creative football with surprisingly smart linkup and quick, confident interchanging between the entire team, allowing complex team moves to build. Their points come from being effective as a team.

 

I don't even think they're that good. They're exceptionally ordinary, especially without Michu. From the first whistle we said "don't worry about us - you do your thing!" which gave them the impetus and, by the end, they were brimming with confidence and embarrassed us. All we because we started the game without a semblance of wanting to compete, save for a counter-attack here and there. It won't work against beatable teams like Swansea.

 

EDIT: your theory is completely sound, though. They're better than the sum of their parts, we're worse than ours, the difference is the managers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kneejerk opinion time:

 

Judging Swansea by the handful of games I've seen:

 

Swansea have p*ss poor-to-average players who are simply coached exceptionally well in a style of play that makes them significantly greater than the sum of their parts. They play moderately attacking, penetrative, creative football with surprisingly smart linkup and quick, confident interchanging between the entire team, allowing complex team moves to build. Their points come from being effective as a team.

 

Judging us by the past few years:

 

We have average-to-good players who are coached exceptionally poorly in a style of play that makes us significantly less than the sum of our parts. We play dull, defensive, workman-like football with minimal linkup play and interchanging that is usually limited to two players passing it between themselves a couple of times at most, leading to very basic "team moves" that inevitably results in a hopeful, blind punt into the penalty box. Our points come from those good players capable of regularly putting in excellent performances here and there and a reliance on the opposition being consistently s***/wasteful in the final third.

 

 

:thup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...