Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Due out soon but we know what our turnover is (huge increase is due to the massive increase in media revenue) via Deloitte's report which has just been released so we're looking at an approximate £50 million profit - the fat w***** wins again!

 

19th highest revenue in world football but don't forget; 'we can't compete'!

 

 

Club 2013/14 Revenue (£m) (2012/13 Revenue):

 

1 Real Madrid 459.5 (444.7)

 

2 Manchester United 433.2 (363.2)

 

3 Bayern Munich 407.7 (369.6)

 

4 FC Barcelona 405.2 (413.6)

 

5 Paris Saint-Germain 396.5 (341.8.)

 

6 Manchester City 346.5 (271.0)

 

7 Chelsea 324.4 (260.0)

 

8 Arsenal 300.5 (243.6)

 

9 Liverpool 255.8 (206.2)

 

10 Juventus 233.6 (233.5)

 

11 Borussia Dortmund 218.7 (219.6)

 

12 Milan 208.8 (225.8.)

 

13 Tottenham Hotspur 180.5 (147.4)

 

14 Schalke 04 178.9 (169.9)

 

15 Atletico Madrid 142.1 (102.8.)

 

16 Napoli 137.8 (99.8.)

 

17 Internazionale 137.1 (141.0)

 

18 Galatasaray 135.4 (134.6)

 

19 Newcastle United 129.7 (95.9)

 

20 Everton 120.5 (.86.4)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that including player trading? Just had a quick butchers at the 2004 report and then we generated 90m excluding player trading. (http://www.nufc.co.uk/staticFiles/68/4/0,,10278~1128,00.pdf)

No, from page six :

 

"Revenue excludes player transfer fees, VAT and other sales related taxes"

 

Here's a link to the PDF : http://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/uk/Documents/sports-business-group/deloitte-football-money-league-2015.PDF

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Is that including player trading? Just had a quick butchers at the 2004 report and then we generated 90m excluding player trading. (http://www.nufc.co.uk/staticFiles/68/4/0,,10278~1128,00.pdf)

 

So in a decade the clubs income has barely increased despite the tens of millions extra p.a. from the TV deals.

 

It doesn't mate so there's the Cabaye deal to factor in too!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is anyone surprised? Remember how much is being creamed off the top into Sports Direct (advertising and merchandising)

 

These figures don't lie and you would hope some of the nationals pick up on this (because The Chron won't!) and ask what the hell is going on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How would Deloitte get the figures? Surely they've guesstimated

 

Here's what it says for anyone who can't read it

 

HOW WE DID IT

 

We have used the figure for total revenue extracted from the annual financial statements of the company or group in respect of each club, or other direct sources, for the 2013/14 season (unless otherwise stated).

 

Revenue excludes player transfer fees, VAT and other sales related taxes. In a few cases we have made adjustments to total revenue figures to enable, in our view, a more meaningful comparison of the football business on a club by club basis.

 

Information is derived from audited financial statements or information sourced directly from individual clubs. Based on the information made available to us in respect of each club, to the extent possible, we have split revenue into three categories – being revenue derived from matchday, broadcast and commercial sources. Clubs are not wholly consistent with each other in the way they classify revenue. In some cases we have made reclassification adjustments to the disclosed figures to enable, in our view, a more meaningful comparison of the financial results.

 

 

Newcastle

 

Newcastle United return to the Money League in 19th place after increasing revenues by 35% to £129.7m. On the pitch the Magpies endured a frustrating season; exiting both cup competitions in the early rounds, and suffering home and away defeats to arch rivals Sunderland before finally finishing in 10th place in the Premier League.

 

Newcastle’s broadcast revenue, much like the other English clubs, increased significantly by £27.2m (53%) to £78.2m thanks to the new Premier League broadcast deals. This offset the loss of UEFA distributions (€5.3m) as a result of Newcastle’s run to the quarter-final stages of the UEFA Europa League the previous season.

 

Newcastle’s lack of European football in 2013/14 resulted in four fewer home matches being played at St James’ Park, which decreased matchday revenue by 7% to £25.9m. The St James’ Park average attendance of 50,688 for the Premier League season was the third highest in the division.

 

Commercially, revenue increased by an impressive 50% to £25.6m in 2013/14. This was the first year of the controversial shirt sponsorship agreement with Wonga, as well as the continuation of long term partnerships with Puma and Thomas Cook, and the addition of online gaming brand 138.com. With Wonga and Thomas Cook already signed up to long term agreements, and Puma recently announcing a long term contract extension at the start of the 2014/15 season, Newcastle United are commercially in the strongest position in their history.

 

After being an ever present in the Money League until 2007/08, the new Premier League broadcast deal has helped propel Newcastle United back into the Money League top 20 this year. Given the strong commercial performance of the club coupled with the Toon Army’s continuing support in their impressive numbers, Newcastle should be capable of an extended stay in the Money League in future editions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Btw I'm a bit curious how Spurs' matchday income is so much higher than ours: ~£44m to ~£26m, given the average attendances of both. Would that just be the extra home games they played due to Europa/cup runs compared to us?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

Btw I'm a bit curious how Spurs' matchday income is so much higher than ours: ~£44m to ~£26m, given the average attendances of both. Would that just be the extra home games they played due to Europa/cup runs compared to us?

 

Spurs match day tickets and season tickets are almost double our average.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got off the bus this morning and the first thing I heard was a random passer by say the words "financially sound". :anguish: I was trying to avoid thinking about football, but you just know it was about us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

And people questioning the credibility of Deloitte, jesus wept :lol:

 

I know, apart from being one of world's best accounting organisations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is this news? Been happening for 8 years.

 

And people questioning the credibility of Deloitte, jesus wept :lol:

 

Who is questioning their credibility? Just seems akward that they would have/publish figures that have not been officially published in the accounts yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...