Hanshithispantz Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 It's not just the mackems like, you just need to look on Twitter or read the comments section of a shite rag to see that. Many people see this as a naive bloke duped into being a nonce by a conniving little slut. He faces punishment where as the girl can only 'gain' from a law put there to protect minors from being sexually abused. It's considered 'left wing' to not mercilessly bash the victim from behind your computer screen. It's really, really weird. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 I think it is the fact that loads of lasses under 16 are sexually active, therefore people say the age of consent should be lowered. Obviously this misses the point of the law completely, but that isn't how internet mongs think. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mistle17 Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 It's not just the mackems like, you just need to look on Twitter or read the comments section of a s**** rag to see that. Many people see this as a naive bloke duped into being a nonce by a conniving little slut. He faces punishment where as the girl can only 'gain' from a law put there to protect minors from being sexually abused. It's considered 'left wing' to not mercilessly bash the victim from behind your computer screen. It's really, really weird. One of the worst parts of social media is the distortion of 'left' and 'right' that it has created now all those gobshites effectively 'have a voice' and shriek hysterically about what is 'liberal' and what is 'fascist/right wing/bigoted'. Don't bother with any form of SM now, you waste your life reading stupid things from stupid people. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 I've just had a read through that thread having heard the news and tbf there's quite a few level headed responses on there. However, that Dangernonce is something else, even going as far as to call someone a "Mag" for berating Johnson's actions!? Oh yeah and that one poster who claims Johnson should sue the Daily Mail for calling him a Paedophile as he "technically isn't one". SMH. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 It's not just the mackems like, you just need to look on Twitter or read the comments section of a s**** rag to see that. Many people see this as a naive bloke duped into being a nonce by a conniving little slut. He faces punishment where as the girl can only 'gain' from a law put there to protect minors from being sexually abused. It's considered 'left wing' to not mercilessly bash the victim from behind your computer screen. It's really, really weird. One of the worst parts of social media is the distortion of 'left' and 'right' that it has created now all those gobshites effectively 'have a voice' and shriek hysterically about what is 'liberal' and what is 'fascist/right wing/bigoted'. Don't bother with any form of SM now, you waste your life reading stupid things from stupid people. I'm sick of it. Not sure how it could possibly end either, people get tribal over out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 I think it is the fact that loads of lasses under 16 are sexually active, therefore people say the age of consent should be lowered. Obviously this misses the point of the law completely, but that isn't how internet mongs think. I mean I can understand the argument like, the law is probably weird when you get to a 15 year old shagging a 17 year old 'n stuff like that. Using Johnson as an example to make their point isn't really going to wash though I don't think there's any way to make that point without sounding like a closeted nonce. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 As funny as it is, six years seems far too much. It's like what you get for killing someone. Two-three years would be sufficient. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 Aye, 6 years is mental. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 6 years for killing someone Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 I think they are Wum posts Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 Nope. http://www.businessinsider.com/why-norways-prison-system-is-so-successful-2014-12 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 So a different countries judicial system is the comparison? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 He'll serve 3 (I think) in the UK, I don't think that's too much personally. I'm generally for shorter sentences, but I think it's justified when a 28 year old man grooms a 15 year old over Facebook. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
St1pe Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 He'll serve 3 (I think) in the UK, I don't think that's too much personally. I'm generally for shorter sentences, but I think it's justified when a 28 year old man grooms a 15 year old over Facebook. This. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 will he play football again when he gets out? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 He fingered a school child, nuff said really Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shintonsghost Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 Not this cunt again.he can rot Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordiesteve710 Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 It's not just the mackems like, you just need to look on Twitter or read the comments section of a s**** rag to see that. Many people see this as a naive bloke duped into being a nonce by a conniving little slut. He faces punishment where as the girl can only 'gain' from a law put there to protect minors from being sexually abused. It's considered 'left wing' to not mercilessly bash the victim from behind your computer screen. It's really, really weird. One of the worst parts of social media is the distortion of 'left' and 'right' that it has created now all those gobshites effectively 'have a voice' and shriek hysterically about what is 'liberal' and what is 'fascist/right wing/bigoted'. Don't bother with any form of SM now, you waste your life reading stupid things from stupid people. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 Norway would probably have given Savile community service. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 Norway would probably have given Savile community service. We gave him a knighthood. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heron Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 I think it is the fact that loads of lasses under 16 are sexually active, therefore people say the age of consent should be lowered. Obviously this misses the point of the law completely, but that isn't how internet mongs think. I mean I can understand the argument like, the law is probably weird when you get to a 15 year old shagging a 17 year old 'n stuff like that. Using Johnson as an example to make their point isn't really going to wash though I don't think there's any way to make that point without sounding like a closeted nonce. They're Mackems, they're not used to washing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 It's not just the mackems like, you just need to look on Twitter or read the comments section of a s**** rag to see that. Many people see this as a naive bloke duped into being a nonce by a conniving little slut. He faces punishment where as the girl can only 'gain' from a law put there to protect minors from being sexually abused. It's considered 'left wing' to not mercilessly bash the victim from behind your computer screen. It's really, really weird. One of the worst parts of social media is the distortion of 'left' and 'right' that it has created now all those gobshites effectively 'have a voice' and shriek hysterically about what is 'liberal' and what is 'fascist/right wing/bigoted'. Don't bother with any form of SM now, you waste your life reading stupid things from stupid people. Sado Masochism ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 Norway would probably have given Savile community service. We gave him a knighthood. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordiesteve710 Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 Norway would probably have given Savile community service. We gave him a knighthood. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts