gazza ladra Posted September 16, 2020 Share Posted September 16, 2020 our entire program is run by Yank PFMs. Utter fucking dinosaurs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Mad money Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Amazed they've turned that down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 He's one of their best players and they might not have an adequate replacement lined up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 He's one of their best players and they might not have an adequate replacement lined up. Think they'll get that much for him when they get relegated though? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 He's one of their best players and they might not have an adequate replacement lined up. Think they'll get that much for him when they get relegated though? It's all relative. It seems a mad price, but Burnley are a side dependant on their defensive strength. If they deem him vital to PL survival and are under no pressure to sell they can demand what they see fit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Apparently it's a fake bid to make it look like they are wanting to spend as he wouldn't want to join. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John P Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Liverpool apparently agreed a deal for Thiago. Bloody brilliant player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Wijnaldum off then? Liverpool will need to offset the cost somehow so Klopp can still claim they're the only club not spending money in the top 6. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John P Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Wijnaldum off then? Liverpool will need to offset the cost somehow so Klopp can still claim they're the only club not spending money in the top 6. Apparently they'll sign Thiago regardless of whether Wijnaldum leaves. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Wijnaldum off then? Liverpool will need to offset the cost somehow so Klopp can still claim they're the only club not spending money in the top 6. Apparently they'll sign Thiago regardless of whether Wijnaldum leaves. No brainer that deal to sign him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Buy back clauses are better for player development than loans imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Holden Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Liverpool apparently agreed a deal for Thiago. Bloody brilliant player. Shame that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Buy back clauses are better for player development than loans imo. It’s better in that it means players are getting game time but it doesn’t address the main issue which is big club hording player talent Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Buy back clauses are better for player development than loans imo. It’s better in that it means players are getting game time but it doesn’t address the main issue which is big club hording player talent Exactly this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conjo Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Difference is that for loans (generally) smaller clubs pay bigger clubs to loan players. With a buy back clause the buying club will get more back than what they initially paid. If a selling club decides to exercise a buy back clause then presumably the player has done very well for his new club so it's a win win for them that they have gotten value for what they paid and made money off of him. As college dropout says, it's also better for player development so all in all, miles better than loans, even though it is a (way more expensive) way of hording player talent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 If Regulion is one of the best left backs in la liga, why is he leaving Real? I've not kept up to speed with Spanish football. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 If Regulion is one of the best left backs in la liga, why is he leaving Real? I've not kept up to speed with Spanish football. Real obviously think they don't need him right now. Think they could potentially be letting their two best full backs go in him and Hakimi Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 If Regulion is one of the best left backs in la liga, why is he leaving Real? I've not kept up to speed with Spanish football. Real obviously think they don't need him right now. Think they could potentially be letting their two best full backs go in him and Hakimi No potentially about it with Hakimi. That's an absolutely baffling decision. No buy back clause for him either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 For genuine academy products I don’t have much of a problem with it. Carvajal, Hakimi, Morata & Reguillon all from the Madrid academy. Hakimi just went out on loan to Dortmund. Dortmund probably spent millions in loan fees and get no fee back. Real have just sold him to Inter. Carvajal is a first team regular. Morata was a good backup striker upon his return and they sold him after a year. Madrid do tend to use their academy as a cash cow. Saying that I don’t know why they brought back that Dominican lad. He doesn’t play and they haven’t sold him. He did well at Lille. Whole time the players have a choice to return I believe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Think Hakimi has beef with Zidane. No idea why. They could’ve had both Carvajal and Hakimi for a year without Hakimi’s value dipping significantly if they wanted to sell him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Zidane has beef with Reguilón, rumor goes. Allegedly some conflict with one of Zidane's sons when both played for the B team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ritchie Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Zidane seems to have beef with everybody. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Spurs exponentially increasing their first XI with those two signings mind. Massively needed too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikky Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Looks like Bayern are after Serginho Dest also - Barca need to find some money pretty soon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now