Jump to content

Other clubs' transfers


Recommended Posts

Had a really disappointing season last year mind, 0 goals and 1 assist despite playing every game. I think his lack of progression was one of the main reasons Burnley went down.

 

 

Edited by ponsaelius

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Optimistic Nut said:

Will they just switch Cancelo to right-back?

 

I don't think Cucurella even necessarily starts regularly. Zinchenko at LB was the weak link last season whenever he played there, now they can rotate Walker and Cucurella on the opposite side of Cancelo, Stones and Ake ready step in in case of emergency. Cancelo being able to play on either side is such a strength on top of his amazing ability, ridiculous player.

 

 

Edited by Pata

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ponsaelius said:

Had a really disappointing season last year mind, 0 goals and 1 assist despite playing every game. I think his lack of progression was one of the main reasons Burnley went down.

 

 

 

Gouffran-esque

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

Is Ake not leaving Man City now?

No, Pep said the other day he has persuaded him to stay

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Shearergol said:

 

"wrote their debt off"

 

It's all bullshit. Fucking hate it.

 

Lets see if Tuchel can actually pull it all together and how these players cope in the league.

 

It's all just names and big fees for now, and it's easy to get caught up in all of it. I personally am still very sceptical. They are all over the place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the fucking point of FFP if clubs are just going to do that?

 

And why are we seemingly the only club with money willing to play by those rules? There has to be a point when a massive heel turn comes along.

 

Or maybe it’s just as simple that we can’t attract those players yet until we reach Europe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chelsea make a lot of money from player sales, and if they are in trouble they can always sell one of their many players who they hide in cupboards who happen to be worth £20m who never see the light of day. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

Debt has nothing to do with FFP; it’s about profit and loss and only qualified profit and loss. 

‘Debt’ itself isn’t included in ffp, but ‘financial costs’ are. Surely by not having to repay interest and loan repayments by now having no debt, Chelsea are infinitely better off for ffp, not to mention actually having that same extra cash to spend other than on those repayments? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Manxst said:

‘Debt’ itself isn’t included in ffp, but ‘financial costs’ are. Surely by not having to repay interest and loan repayments by now having no debt, Chelsea are infinitely better off for ffp, not to mention actually having that same extra cash to spend other than on those repayments? 

Your absolutely correct but doing that would be against the spirit of FFP. To protect the interests of the big clubs. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Tiresias said:

Chelsea make a lot of money from player sales, and if they are in trouble they can always sell one of their many players who they hide in cupboards who happen to be worth £20m who never see the light of day. 

 

I can't be sure, but I'm pretty sure I'm a Chelsea loanee they have forgotten about. Wide forward, 0 PL apps, will only cost you £30m (English you see).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...