Other clubs' transfers

[gbandit]

There’s no denying Grealish has a lot of talent and he provides something that almost no England players do, can run with the ball and will either cut through or he’ll get taken down and you win a free kick. I don’t think he’s a £100m player though, he’d need to be a pivotal player for them or someone who continually won them games with his quality alone. As it stands, I’d say he’s fairly replaceable for Man City, at least if they’d be willing to spend £60-£70m

[Froggy]

2 hours ago, toon25 said:

Grealish would be likeable if he had a braincell.

 

He fits in like a treat with fellow brain donor Kyle Walker at Shiteh

 

He plays for City but I find Grealish one of the most likeable players off the pitch. He's not the sharpest tool in the box but his heart seems to be in the right place. 

 

 

Edited March 21, 2023 by Froggy

[The Butcher]

Wouldn't be too surprised if this one and Bellingham both end up at City.

[Manxst]

4 minutes ago, The Butcher said:

Wouldn't be too surprised if this one and Bellingham both end up at City.

Arsenal with Arteta. IF he leaves Barca, which I doubt- they’ll wangle a way to keep him and get a new contract signed. 

[woody]

3 hours ago, joeyt said:

 

I watched a clip of Villa vs Newcastle from a few years ago and completely forgot yous had Ross Barkley for a season

Barkley's apparently playing in Ligue 1 now. Random.

[mosstef]

14 minutes ago, woody said:

Barkley's apparently playing in Ligue 1 now. Random.

 

that's nice

[joeyt]

 

 

 

[Kid Icarus]

I think this is probably me just being a misery and not looking into it properly, but from a distance I find the whole fuss around Wrexham because it's owned by a couple of celebrities canny irritating. 

 

 

Edited March 23, 2023 by Kid Icarus

[Paully]

So he missed out on a Cup Final to sign for Wrexham?!

[KDT]

Looks like Foster has made the move for non-footballing reasons, it'll all be about how he progress his social media career.

[Dr.Spaceman]

Yep, the numbers on his Youtube channel will be off the charts when he inevitably gets Reynolds and McElhenney on as guests.

 

Fair play to him tbh.

[joeyt]

14 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

I think this is probably me just being a misery and not looking into it properly, but from a distance I find the whole fuss around Wrexham because it's owned by a couple of celebrities canny irritating. 

 

 

 

 

Yeah find the whole circus around it pretty annoying

[gjohnson]

I rather enjoy it for the comedy purposes. Would be better if it was Hugh Jackman with Reynolds instead of Mchellneyyty or whatever his name is....purely because of this:

 

 

[cubaricho]

To be fair, if you watch the show, they actually give a shit and it’s not just some massive publicity stunt. And the people of Wrexham are beside themselves with joy and good times. It has to be an incredible feeling for them. 

 

 

Edited March 23, 2023 by cubaricho

[Guest]

5 hours ago, gjohnson said:

I rather enjoy it for the comedy purposes. Would be better if it was Hugh Jackman with Reynolds instead of Mchellneyyty or whatever his name is....purely because of this:

 

 

 

McElhenney is the better of the two. 

[Froggy]

23 minutes ago, cubaricho said:

To be fair, if you watch the show, they actually give a shit and it’s not just some massive publicity stunt. And the people of Wrexham are beside themselves with joy and good times. It has to be an incredible feeling for them. 

 

It's quality. can only assume people haven't watched the documentary as you need to be dead inside to dislike anything about the situation once you know the full story. 

[ponsaelius]

Welcome to Wrexham is brilliant.

 

I have no issue whatsoever with them tbh. Their ownership model is a million times better than most who get involved in lower league clubs, particularly compared to the absolute shite that Wrexham have been through. And they both come across brilliantly on the show.

 

[ponsaelius]

Also unlike a lot of North American owners they have got involved in football because of how different it is to American sports. The football pyramid system of promotion/relegation and the way clubs are wedded to their communities are basically the main things that attracted McElhenney to look to buy a club in the first place.

[Astroblack]

I just hate them because It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia is perhaps the worst television program in the history of TV. 

[andyc35i]

1 hour ago, Astroblack said:

I just hate them because It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia is perhaps the worst television program in the history of TV. 

It’s clearly not mate. I’d acknowledge that it’s silly, exaggerated humour, but I think it offers some charm and the characters are great 

[Astroblack]

5 minutes ago, andyc35i said:

It’s clearly not mate. I’d acknowledge that it’s silly, exaggerated humour, but I think it offers some charm and the characters are great 

I don’t think there’s any charm whatsoever. All the characters seem to hate each other. It’s not clever and I’m pretty sure it’s mostly improvised. Everyone just rejects everyone’s ideas till the good looking one(think his name is Dennis) comes up with an idea and then they all go “yea yea, let’s do that”. 
 

And listen, I have taste. I’ve seen everything from The Wire to Trailer Park Boys(IMO GOAT comedy), Office UK, Breaking Bad, Peep Show, pretty much everything on the IMDB 250 and if I was rating It’s Always Sunny on a scale of 1-10, it’d get a 2 and that’s only because the production makes it look like a real TV show. I have watched the show with a straight face because there are literally NO JOKES. Zero. It’s like some sort of shock humor or something. I can’t explain it and I’m bewildered at the amount of fans it has. 

[andyc35i]

I’d disagree with your 2/10 rating, but that’s why television (like football) is great because it divides taste and therefore opinion. All the shows you mentioned are great -  although I’d say Breaking Bad was extremely overhyped in my view which is similar to your point on Sunny I guess 

[Froggy]

2 minutes ago, andyc35i said:

I’d say Breaking Bad was extremely overhyped

 

[1964]

12 hours ago, Astroblack said:

I don’t think there’s any charm whatsoever. All the characters seem to hate each other. It’s not clever and I’m pretty sure it’s mostly improvised. Everyone just rejects everyone’s ideas till the good looking one(think his name is Dennis) comes up with an idea and then they all go “yea yea, let’s do that”. 
 

And listen, I have taste. I’ve seen everything from The Wire to Trailer Park Boys(IMO GOAT comedy), Office UK, Breaking Bad, Peep Show, pretty much everything on the IMDB 250 and if I was rating It’s Always Sunny on a scale of 1-10, it’d get a 2 and that’s only because the production makes it look like a real TV show. I have watched the show with a straight face because there are literally NO JOKES. Zero. It’s like some sort of shock humor or something. I can’t explain it and I’m bewildered at the amount of fans it has. 

Should be called its never funny in philidelphia 

[The College Dropout]

12 hours ago, Astroblack said:

I don’t think there’s any charm whatsoever. All the characters seem to hate each other. It’s not clever and I’m pretty sure it’s mostly improvised. Everyone just rejects everyone’s ideas till the good looking one(think his name is Dennis) comes up with an idea and then they all go “yea yea, let’s do that”. 
 

And listen, I have taste. I’ve seen everything from The Wire to Trailer Park Boys(IMO GOAT comedy), Office UK, Breaking Bad, Peep Show, pretty much everything on the IMDB 250 and if I was rating It’s Always Sunny on a scale of 1-10, it’d get a 2 and that’s only because the production makes it look like a real TV show. I have watched the show with a straight face because there are literally NO JOKES. Zero. It’s like some sort of shock humor or something. I can’t explain it and I’m bewildered at the amount of fans it has. 

Hell on Earth or Infamous though?