Greg Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 More of a cross. Was going in though. No. Looked it at the time mind. Though Elliott did well to get down to it. He did, was a cross though and not going in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 You can tell that is a team managed by Roy Hodgson They’ll be in or around the bottom 3 come May. That is exactly the type of game we’d have lost previously, a good 3 points from an absolutely terrible game. We have (and will) play better than that and lose, so it’s good to pick up 3 points on an off day. What a load of tripe about hodgson. What? A boring team with little/no ideas going forward - the perfect Roy Hodgson team. They have no strikers tbf, not his fault That has absolutely nothing to do with his team being boring or having little/no ideas going forward tbh. You can play without a striker and still be fun and not lack ideas, i'd argue that him not starting Loftus Cheek just strengthens figures argument tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 You can tell that is a team managed by Roy Hodgson They’ll be in or around the bottom 3 come May. That is exactly the type of game we’d have lost previously, a good 3 points from an absolutely terrible game. We have (and will) play better than that and lose, so it’s good to pick up 3 points on an off day. What a load of tripe about hodgson. What? A boring team with little/no ideas going forward - the perfect Roy Hodgson team. They have no strikers tbf, not his fault And his reign as England manager? With one of the best strikers available? He’s past it and will take that Palace team down. What does England have to do with his Palace team? Just further evidence that his teams are boring and lack ideas going forward, even with one of the best strikers in it. Your response to his Palace team being dreadful was that he doesn’t have a striker, my reply was that it makes no difference. Your point was that they were a typical Hodgson team. It's not fair to say that yet Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 You can tell that is a team managed by Roy Hodgson They’ll be in or around the bottom 3 come May. That is exactly the type of game we’d have lost previously, a good 3 points from an absolutely terrible game. We have (and will) play better than that and lose, so it’s good to pick up 3 points on an off day. What a load of tripe about hodgson. What? A boring team with little/no ideas going forward - the perfect Roy Hodgson team. They have no strikers tbf, not his fault That has absolutely nothing to do with his team being boring or having little/no ideas going forward tbh. You can play without a striker and still be fun and not lack ideas, i'd argue that him not starting Loftus Cheek just strengthens figures argument tbh. Having no players who can play as a striker has nothing to do with his team being boring or lacking ideas going forward? Ok then Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 Total shite. But 1.0 will mask the fact we were 2nd best all over today. A win is a win though. Not bad for the worst promoted team in history Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 This was a great game for me, yes it was boring as fuck and we were nowhere near our best but when that goal went in I was jumping around at work like an absolute loon, I can't tell you the last time I was as passionate about a win/goal. I don't know if it's down to all the take over talk or just being on board with Rafa but it's the first time I've felt the passion come back since before the Pardew era, to this extent at least. If/once the takeover is complete it's gonna wake up a sleeping giant not just on the pitch but in the stands. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 Quick scan of Palace forums. Nice to see they're a humble bunch of fans . Good riddance. The very definition of small-time and tin pot club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collage Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 Cabaye, the little twat. Should've been sent off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shays Given Tim Flowers Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 Quick scan of Palace forums. Nice to see they're a humble bunch of fans . Good riddance. The very definition of small-time and tin pot club. Ian and TCD. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xLiaaamx Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 More of a cross. Was going in though. No. Looked it at the time mind. Though Elliott did well to get down to it. He did well to get down and stop it, but it was rolling across the face, not going in Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 This was a great game for me, yes it was boring as fuck and we were nowhere near our best but when that goal went in I was jumping around at work like an absolute loon, I can't tell you the last time I was as passionate about a win/goal. I don't know if it's down to all the take over talk or just being on board with Rafa but it's the first time I've felt the passion come back since before the Pardew era, to this extent at least. If/once the takeover is complete it's gonna wake up a sleeping giant not just on the pitch but in the stands. I think a lot of people are like minded. The atmosphere in parts today was probably the best it’s been in a long time. Even though the majority of the game things were not going well for us, the crowd got behind the team and I honestly think in the last 20 minutes or so the atmosphere was the difference. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulivye Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 Mitro's cameo was pretty terrible. Almost give away goal with one of his first touches, and then comically stayed down after being hit with the ball. It was rifled at it him full pelt from about 3 yards ffs, obviously winded him. saw this on twitter: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 Who went down for them after taking one in the dial from Atsu? Dann? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 You can tell that is a team managed by Roy Hodgson They’ll be in or around the bottom 3 come May. That is exactly the type of game we’d have lost previously, a good 3 points from an absolutely terrible game. We have (and will) play better than that and lose, so it’s good to pick up 3 points on an off day. What a load of tripe about hodgson. What? A boring team with little/no ideas going forward - the perfect Roy Hodgson team. They have no strikers tbf, not his fault That has absolutely nothing to do with his team being boring or having little/no ideas going forward tbh. You can play without a striker and still be fun and not lack ideas, i'd argue that him not starting Loftus Cheek just strengthens figures argument tbh. Having no players who can play as a striker has nothing to do with his team being boring or lacking ideas going forward? Ok then What? strikers have fuck all to do with a team being entertaining or needing ideas going forward. Pep could bench Aguero and Jesus for the rest of the season and they wouldn't be boring or lack ideas. I dunno about you but a striker doesn't suddenly make a team exciting to watch that wasn't before. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xLiaaamx Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 Aye. To be fair, it was a pelter. He caught all of it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 I was surprised Loftus Cheek didn't play, anyone driving from midfield like he does would have really put pressure on us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 I was surprised Loftus Cheek didn't play, anyone driving from midfield like he does would have really put pressure on us. He came on - and looked decent too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 I cracked up at Dann's blow. Smacked him right in the face. Boom, siddown. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginola Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 Atsu has been much better in the PL than he was in the Championship btw Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 Like Joselu's but with the head. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 You can tell that is a team managed by Roy Hodgson They’ll be in or around the bottom 3 come May. That is exactly the type of game we’d have lost previously, a good 3 points from an absolutely terrible game. We have (and will) play better than that and lose, so it’s good to pick up 3 points on an off day. What a load of tripe about hodgson. What? A boring team with little/no ideas going forward - the perfect Roy Hodgson team. They have no strikers tbf, not his fault That has absolutely nothing to do with his team being boring or having little/no ideas going forward tbh. You can play without a striker and still be fun and not lack ideas, i'd argue that him not starting Loftus Cheek just strengthens figures argument tbh. Having no players who can play as a striker has nothing to do with his team being boring or lacking ideas going forward? Ok then What? strikers have fuck all to do with a team being entertaining or needing ideas going forward. Pep could bench Aguero and Jesus for the rest of the season and they wouldn't be boring or lack ideas. I dunno about you but a striker doesn't suddenly make a team exciting to watch that wasn't before. Aye well I'm not comparing Roy Hodgson to Pep Guardiola Most managers would struggle to have a good attacking team with no strikers available. If we had Harry Kane up front I think we'd be much more entertaining but fair enough if you disagree Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 I was surprised Loftus Cheek didn't play, anyone driving from midfield like he does would have really put pressure on us. He came on - and looked decent too. Aye I know, I meant I expected him to start. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 You can tell that is a team managed by Roy Hodgson They’ll be in or around the bottom 3 come May. That is exactly the type of game we’d have lost previously, a good 3 points from an absolutely terrible game. We have (and will) play better than that and lose, so it’s good to pick up 3 points on an off day. What a load of tripe about hodgson. What? A boring team with little/no ideas going forward - the perfect Roy Hodgson team. They have no strikers tbf, not his fault That has absolutely nothing to do with his team being boring or having little/no ideas going forward tbh. You can play without a striker and still be fun and not lack ideas, i'd argue that him not starting Loftus Cheek just strengthens figures argument tbh. Having no players who can play as a striker has nothing to do with his team being boring or lacking ideas going forward? Ok then What? strikers have fuck all to do with a team being entertaining or needing ideas going forward. Pep could bench Aguero and Jesus for the rest of the season and they wouldn't be boring or lack ideas. I dunno about you but a striker doesn't suddenly make a team exciting to watch that wasn't before. Aye well I'm not comparing Roy Hodgson to Pep Guardiola Most managers would struggle to have a good attacking team with no strikers available. If we had Harry Kane up front I think we'd be much more entertaining but fair enough if you disagree So if Roy Hodgson had Harry Kane, he’d have a much more entertaining team? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 You can tell that is a team managed by Roy Hodgson They’ll be in or around the bottom 3 come May. That is exactly the type of game we’d have lost previously, a good 3 points from an absolutely terrible game. We have (and will) play better than that and lose, so it’s good to pick up 3 points on an off day. What a load of tripe about hodgson. What? A boring team with little/no ideas going forward - the perfect Roy Hodgson team. They have no strikers tbf, not his fault That has absolutely nothing to do with his team being boring or having little/no ideas going forward tbh. You can play without a striker and still be fun and not lack ideas, i'd argue that him not starting Loftus Cheek just strengthens figures argument tbh. Having no players who can play as a striker has nothing to do with his team being boring or lacking ideas going forward? Ok then What? strikers have fuck all to do with a team being entertaining or needing ideas going forward. Pep could bench Aguero and Jesus for the rest of the season and they wouldn't be boring or lack ideas. I dunno about you but a striker doesn't suddenly make a team exciting to watch that wasn't before. Aye well I'm not comparing Roy Hodgson to Pep Guardiola Most managers would struggle to have a good attacking team with no strikers available. If we had Harry Kane up front I think we'd be much more entertaining but fair enough if you disagree So if Roy Hodgson had Harry Kane, he’d have a much more entertaining team? I never said anything like that. I said that its unfair to judge their attacking skills on a game where they had no fit strikers available. Of course its very likely they will be poor going forward anyway Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 You can tell that is a team managed by Roy Hodgson They’ll be in or around the bottom 3 come May. That is exactly the type of game we’d have lost previously, a good 3 points from an absolutely terrible game. We have (and will) play better than that and lose, so it’s good to pick up 3 points on an off day. What a load of tripe about hodgson. What? A boring team with little/no ideas going forward - the perfect Roy Hodgson team. They have no strikers tbf, not his fault That has absolutely nothing to do with his team being boring or having little/no ideas going forward tbh. You can play without a striker and still be fun and not lack ideas, i'd argue that him not starting Loftus Cheek just strengthens figures argument tbh. Having no players who can play as a striker has nothing to do with his team being boring or lacking ideas going forward? Ok then What? strikers have fuck all to do with a team being entertaining or needing ideas going forward. Pep could bench Aguero and Jesus for the rest of the season and they wouldn't be boring or lack ideas. I dunno about you but a striker doesn't suddenly make a team exciting to watch that wasn't before. Aye well I'm not comparing Roy Hodgson to Pep Guardiola Most managers would struggle to have a good attacking team with no strikers available. If we had Harry Kane up front I think we'd be much more entertaining but fair enough if you disagree So if Roy Hodgson had Harry Kane, he’d have a much more entertaining team? I never said anything like that. I said that its unfair to judge their attacking skills on a game where they had no fit strikers available. Of course its very likely they will be poor going forward anyway Nobody is judging Hodgson on one game though; they are judging him over his entire England career and so far his short career with Palace. He had an England team with a lot of in-form attacking talent and managed to make them into one of the most boring England sides I have ever seen and oversaw two hideous tournaments. You’ve just said Harry Kane would make us more entertaining - so why were England as dull and uninspiring as Palace today? He was a decent manager, he’s now out of touch with the modern game and his dinosaur tactics aren’t going to work. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now