Jump to content

Various: N-O has lost the plot over potential end of Mike Ashley's tenure


Recommended Posts

 

 

Yep. That was really really good. Think everyone should listen to that for some insights into this takeover and previous ones that didn’t quite make.

 

Interesting that BZG pulled out because they felt it was an insult to have to pay a non-refundable deposit to Ashley, along with a number of other insults they felt Ashley dealt them.

 

Also, rumours that the new owners have already bought the freehold for SJP. (Some leaks from the city council)

 

And that PIF/PCP etc had been told around June 1st by the PL that they were going to pass the takeover but on the proviso that they make efforts to sort the piracy. PIF apparently felt that this meant the deal was done.

 

Well worth a listen, whatever you think of Wraith and Mitch.

They can’t buy the freehold of SJP, not the land in anyway. It is owned by the freeman of the city. The club owns the stadium already, just not the land, which is leased to them and on conditions it’s used for sports. If the Freeman has sold that land then we would know about it by now.

 

Correct. The Freeman would never sell it either as one of their main sources of income.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mate is a freeman and he’s heard nowt

 

I've not heard nowt, and I can graze my cows on the moor.

 

On a side note I wish they'd get rid of archaic shit like this.

 

Why? It protects Newcastle green lands etc from the scrupulous. Don’t mistake Freeman with Freemasons. Everything we do is charitable and for the good of Newcastle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest godzilla

https://twitter.com/rejointheu/status/1281854392908611585?s=20

 

https://twitter.com/rejointheu/status/1282015119023669249?s=20

 

No idea if there is any truth in this but it does make sense to me and seems very likely something the PL would request.

 

52 followers (edit - 8 of them are from today also), pretty sure PIF would have known about anything like this from the start and it's not been reported by anyone else and specifically nobody in the football or business media

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://twitter.com/rejointheu/status/1281854392908611585?s=20

 

https://twitter.com/rejointheu/status/1282015119023669249?s=20

 

No idea if there is any truth in this but it does make sense to me and seems very likely something the PL would request.

 

52 followers, pretty sure PIF would have known about anything like this from the start and it's not been reported by anyone else and specifically nobody in the football or business media

 

It sounds a logical reason however if sponsorship deals are indeed in place. There have been so many issues easy for others to slip notice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest godzilla

https://twitter.com/rejointheu/status/1281854392908611585?s=20

 

https://twitter.com/rejointheu/status/1282015119023669249?s=20

 

No idea if there is any truth in this but it does make sense to me and seems very likely something the PL would request.

 

52 followers, pretty sure PIF would have known about anything like this from the start and it's not been reported by anyone else and specifically nobody in the football or business media

 

It sounds a logical reason however if sponsorship deals are indeed in place. There have been so many issues easy for others to slip notice.

 

Come on man he has 52 followers (8 added today probably Newcastle fans) and do you really think PIF would let anything like that slip.

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://twitter.com/rejointheu/status/1281854392908611585?s=20

 

https://twitter.com/rejointheu/status/1282015119023669249?s=20

 

No idea if there is any truth in this but it does make sense to me and seems very likely something the PL would request.

 

R E Maine (Remain)

 

Sounds legit

 

Aye,  R E Main @ rejointheu  Obviously a sensible lad and definitely his real name, has my full trust :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

So Fly Emirates sponsoring Arsenal’s stadium and shirt as well as sponsoring referee’s and the FA Cup isn’t a problem, but this is? Aye ok, whatever.

 

This is probably BS but the example you give isn't the same. The owners of Emirates don't own Arsenal and then sponsor another club.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So Fly Emirates sponsoring Arsenal’s stadium and shirt as well as sponsoring referee’s and the FA Cup isn’t a problem, but this is? Aye ok, whatever.

 

This is probably BS but the example you give isn't the same. The owners of Emirates don't own Arsenal and then sponsor another club.

 

Think he's talking about Man City owners and Arsenal's sponsors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mate is a freeman and he’s heard nowt

 

I've not heard nowt, and I can graze my cows on the moor.

 

On a side note I wish they'd get rid of archaic shit like this.

 

Why? It protects Newcastle green lands etc from the scrupulous. Don’t mistake Freeman with Freemasons. Everything we do is charitable and for the good of Newcastle.

 

Hereditary status is an affront.  Keep the freemen if you want but award the title to people who actually deserve it, not people who have it because someone else did something.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So Fly Emirates sponsoring Arsenal’s stadium and shirt as well as sponsoring referee’s and the FA Cup isn’t a problem, but this is? Aye ok, whatever.

How is it remotely similar?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Mate is a freeman and he’s heard nowt

 

I've not heard nowt, and I can graze my cows on the moor.

 

On a side note I wish they'd get rid of archaic shit like this.

 

Why? It protects Newcastle green lands etc from the scrupulous. Don’t mistake Freeman with Freemasons. Everything we do is charitable and for the good of Newcastle.

 

Hereditary status is an affront.  Keep the freemen if you want but award the title to people who actually deserve it, not people who have it because someone else did something.

 

An affront to who? What if there is no one derserving of it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mate is a freeman and he’s heard nowt

 

I've not heard nowt, and I can graze my cows on the moor.

 

On a side note I wish they'd get rid of archaic shit like this.

 

Why? It protects Newcastle green lands etc from the scrupulous. Don’t mistake Freeman with Freemasons. Everything we do is charitable and for the good of Newcastle.

 

Hereditary status is an affront.  Keep the freemen if you want but award the title to people who actually deserve it, not people who have it because someone else did something.

 

An affront to who? What if there is no one derserving of it?

 

Then no-one gets it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...