Jump to content
Newcastle-Online

Elliot Anderson (now playing for Nottingham Forest)

joeyt

by joeyt
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Fak

Fak

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Joe1984 said:

Forest would demand a price of between £100-£120m to even consider selling Anderson, according to The Chronicle.

 

He's not coming home... 🤣

 

Spanish press linking him with Real Madrid (!)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Mole

Mole

Posted
Posted
On 16/10/2025 at 15:30, Erikse said:

Rice g/a at West Ham

 

Screenshot_20251016_162731_SamsungInternet.thumb.jpg.d04973e0e85d3d6684141dd091bac150.jpg

 

Rice g/a at Arsenal

 

Screenshot_20251016_162735_SamsungInternet.thumb.jpg.569c050607e383de08af50cb88e3c3b7.jpg

 

 

 

 

I think G/A as a metric is really dumb for most footballers tbh. There are some exceptions obviously, but what really matters is your impact and how the team functions and performs as a result of your performance.

 

How many goals is the team scoring and creating is obviously important but most of the individual importance of it is really not that relevant.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Joe1984

Joe1984

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Fak said:

 

Spanish press linking him with Real Madrid (!)

Tbf if RM signed every player the Spanish press linked them with, their squad would dwarf that of Chelsea's... 🤣

 

 

Edited by Joe1984

Link to post
Share on other sites
Erikse

Erikse

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Mole said:

 

I think G/A as a metric is really dumb for most footballers tbh. There are some exceptions obviously, but what really matters is your impact and how the team functions and performs as a result of your performance.

 

How many goals is the team scoring and creating is obviously important but most of the individual importance of it is really not that relevant.

 

The reason I pulled this up was because people were using Andersons g/a numbers at Forest against him. My point is that even if you are going to focus on that, those numbers can easily go up at a better club. Anderson has a better g/a output than Rice had at West Ham. Just about noone complains about Rices g/a output now.

 

 

Edited by Erikse

Link to post
Share on other sites
Joe1984

Joe1984

Posted
Posted
Just now, Erikse said:

 

The reason I pulled this up was because people were using Andersons g/a output at Forest against him. My point is that even if you are going to focus on that, those numbers can easily go up at a better club.

 

 

 

They can just as easily go down at a better club.

 

See Isak for more info... 😄

Link to post
Share on other sites
Mole

Mole

Posted
Posted
Just now, Erikse said:

 

The reason I pulled this up was because people were using Andersons g/a numbers at Forest against him. My point is that even if you are going to focus on that, those numbers can easily go up at a better club.

Oh I know that but I noticed while typing the discussion had moved past it so decided to quote the closest message about it :mou:

 

I agree with you btw.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Dokko

Dokko

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, Joe1984 said:

Forest would demand a price of between £100-£120m to even consider selling Anderson, according to The Chronicle.

 

He's not coming home... 🤣

 

He's not going anywhere at that price. He will be going for around £60m when they go down this year.

Link to post
Share on other sites
r0cafella

r0cafella

Posted
Posted
Just now, Colos Short and Curlies said:

Anderson for £80m-£100m or Pacqueta for £60m?

 

Its all age related but LP is a much more accomplished player than EA just now which puts the price into perspective a little

 

 

Wouldn't touch either at those prices. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Kimbo

Kimbo

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Colos Short and Curlies said:

Anderson for £80m-£100m or Pacqueta for £60m?

 

Its all age related but LP is a much more accomplished player than EA just now which puts the price into perspective a little

 

 

 

Both of those would be out of our price range IMO. I’d say Anderson, but realistically it’s neither.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Beren

Beren

Posted
Posted
Quote

Premier League players with most passes completed

Virgil van Dijk (Liverpool) – 627
Elliot Anderson (Nottingham Forest) – 613
Lewis Dunk (Brighton) – 573
Ruben Dias (Man City) – 550
Dominik Szoboszlai (Liverpool) – 542

 

Premier League players with most progressive passes

Elliot Anderson (Nottingham Forest) – 78
Bruno Fernandes (Man Utd) – 72
Dominik Szoboszlai (Liverpool) – 69
Jan Paul van Hecke (Brighton) – 65
Kieran Trippier (Newcastle) – 64
Lucas Paqueta (West Ham) – 60
Morgan Gibbs-White (Nottingham Forest) – 60

 

Premier League players with most ball recoveries

Elliot Anderson (Nottingham Forest) – 71
Iliman Ndiaye (Everton) – 58
Dominik Szoboszlai (Liverpool) – 56
Bruno Fernandes (Man Utd) – 55
Andre (Wolves) – 52

 

Bloody hell [emoji38]

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nine

Nine

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, Colos Short and Curlies said:

Anderson for £80m-£100m or Pacqueta for £60m?

 

Its all age related but LP is a much more accomplished player than EA just now which puts the price into perspective a little

 

 

Apples and oranges 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Beren

Beren

Posted
Posted

Also just behind Bruno on fouls won

 

Quote

Premier League players with most fouls won

Jack Grealish (Everton) – 28
Bruno Guimaraes (Newcastle) – 25
Elliot Anderson (Nottingham Forest) – 21
Patrick Dorgu (Man Utd) – 19
Joao Pedro (Chelsea) – 18
Bruno Fernandes (Man Utd) – 18

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Magpie Mover

Magpie Mover

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Mole said:

 

I think G/A as a metric is really dumb for most footballers tbh. There are some exceptions obviously, but what really matters is your impact and how the team functions and performs as a result of your performance.

 

How many goals is the team scoring and creating is obviously important but most of the individual importance of it is really not that relevant.

It's important if you are an attacker, looking at Gordon's G/A is a perfect example of how under performing he is apart from the odd game. Someone playing in Anderson's position not so much. If we still had him and he'd developed as he has for Forest and England he'd be the deepest lying of our midfield three and the most defensive.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Erikse

Erikse

Posted
Posted (edited)
56 minutes ago, Colos Short and Curlies said:

Anderson for £80m-£100m or Pacqueta for £60m?

 

Its all age related but LP is a much more accomplished player than EA just now which puts the price into perspective a little

 

 

 

Anderson if I had to choose. Paqueta is 28 and looks a little bit overrated imo. Anderson is 23 and homegrown.

 

 

Edited by Erikse

Link to post
Share on other sites
Mole

Mole

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Magpie Mover said:

It's important if you are an attacker, looking at Gordon's G/A is a perfect example of how under performing he is apart from the odd game. Someone playing in Anderson's position not so much. If we still had him and he'd developed as he has for Forest and England he'd be the deepest lying of our midfield three and the most defensive.

Yeah that's what I meant by "there is exceptions" But even Gordon, if he was consistently beating his man and putting in crosses or passes consistently in dangerous areas without them being assists I genuinely wouldn't care.

 

If the team were scoring goals as a result of his work it doesn't matter to me if he gets direct credit for it or not. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...