loki679 Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 1 minute ago, 54 said: Just made a cheese sandwich, probably the most entertaining thing i've done in the last hour, Pics Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Just now, Cronky said: Well it was definitely an indirect free kick for dangerous play. No question. What I'm not sure of is whether VAR is supposed to be used for that kind of decision - ie only goals, pens, offside, and foul play. Otherwise it was as clear as anything. I'm glad we're still in it and not two down. Those whipped crosses from the left have us in all sorts of trouble. Almiron looks out of sorts. I don't suppose that remark about wanting to play for a team that battles has helped him much. Being played out of position doesn't really help him much. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantail Breeze Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Just now, Bimpy474 said: Aye i get that to a extent agree but as Joeyt just said, why not let the onfield ref have a look to decide if he got it wrong. I also agree as someone else alluded to, VAR being implemented by idiots isn't helping help it get accepted. As you say though, it's all subjective, no one will ever agree on things. Absolutely, should have directed the ref to have a look. VAR has just replaced the same conversations we had before VAR about decisions. But added in even more confusion as some decisions are look at, and some aren’t. All it has done is slow the game down, rule out goals that should remain, created confusion in stadiums and added more controversy. A win for Sky, I wonder why the media wanted it so much. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 (edited) Just now, neesy111 said: I don't think he did, but what PMGOL said was shite. Another case of then backing themselves and not being held accountable. If you feel as though you need to defends a referee’s decision before the match has even finished, then the decision was fucking wrong. Edited April 11, 2021 by Stifler Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mighty__mag Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 1 minute ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: I’m not sure the pundits know the rules, or what VAR is looking for. Dangerous play = foul Foul in the box = pen Simple?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 2 minutes ago, Fantail Breeze said: They didn’t. One of them was adamant Tarkowski did nothing wrong. I’m not saying it isn’t a pen - I think it is. But there are plenty of people who don’t think it is (Attwell included). Watch it again they did on the replay you’re wrong Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Geordie Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 What have they said in the sky studio? burnley the better team - but we should have had pen. Bruce has his excuses lined up again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbers Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Just now, Big Geordie said: What have they said in the sky studio? burnley the better team - but we should have had pen. Bruce has his excuses lined up again. Yea they all thought it should have been a Pen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Just now, Big Geordie said: What have they said in the sky studio? burnley the better team - but we should have had pen. Bruce has his excuses lined up again. All said it should have been a pen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 2 minutes ago, alexf said: Unbelievable defending for their goal. Not a single player thinks they should mark the only Burnley player in the box There's 2 in the box like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Just now, HaydnNUFC said: Nowhere in the Laws of the Game does it mention "getting the ball" or "playing the ball first". What a load of fucking shit. Correct, it's about endangering an opponent, where the ball is irrelevant at the stage you enter endangering an opponent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaydnNUFC Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Just now, 54 said: Every stat about him is negative. Fuck me he's shite isn't he? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Jinx Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Someone on the radio said it may not have been given because Gayle was judged to be offside? ?♂️ What in the actual fuck.. where was he supposed to go after his momentum took him past the post? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbers Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Just now, 54 said: Grim. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 5 minutes ago, Happinesstan said: Haven't seen it yet, it's on in the background but I'm not watching. Didn't hear anybody say the ref had given a pen? So I assume it was an example of VAR not overruling the ref's decision. It was an example of just how shit the refereeing in general in this country. Effectively two referees failed to apply the rules, the one on the pitch and the one in the tv studio. "But it wasn't deliberate....!!" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mighty__mag Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 1 minute ago, 54 said: ASM ?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 1 minute ago, mighty__mag said: Dangerous play = foul Foul in the box = pen Simple?? I don't think that's correct. It's only fouls that would otherwise have resulted in a direct free kick that get converted into pens. We should have had an indirect free kick on the edge of the goal area, with the defending team having to stand on the goal line. It's not a situation you see very often, and it often results in a goal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomson Mouse Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 6 minutes ago, Fantail Breeze said: They didn’t. One of them was adamant Tarkowski did nothing wrong. I’m not saying it isn’t a pen - I think it is. But there are plenty of people who don’t think it is (Attwell included). They did initially but rapidly back-pedalled Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_R Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 1 minute ago, 54 said: Our expectations are just too unrealistic. Any manager winning more than 1 in 50 from behind at HT should be good enough for Newcastle fans. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Just now, Cronky said: We should have had an indirect free kick on the edge of the goal area, with the defending team having to stand on the goal line. It's not a situation you see very often, and it often results in a goal. You what? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mighty__mag Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Just now, Cronky said: I don't think that's correct. It's only fouls that would otherwise have resulted in a direct free kick that get converted into pens. We should have had an indirect free kick on the edge of the goal area, with the defending team having to stand on the goal line. It's not a situation you see very often, and it often results in a goal. What? So you're claiming it wasn't dangerous play? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happinesstan Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Just now, TRon said: It was an example of just how shit the refereeing in general in this country. Effectively two referees failed to apply the rules, the one on the pitch and the one in the tv studio. "But it wasn't deliberate....!!" It's another example of the public accepting something based on it's falsely advertised qualities. Now we can look forward to a lifetime of complaining about it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Just now, mighty__mag said: What? So you're claiming it wasn't dangerous play? I'm saying dangerous play means an indirect free kick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 PMGOL is the very definition of a kangaroo court. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now