Jump to content

Takeover Thread - July 1st statement, Staveley letter to Tracey Crouch (and response) in OP


Recommended Posts

And is Caulkin on some round-the-world cruise or something? It's a bloody long holiday.

 

Is this serious?

 

He could be writing a book etc.

 

Well of course he could be - point being, he's been quiet on Twitter for a long time. Just re-tweets and replies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And is Caulkin on some round-the-world cruise or something? It's a bloody long holiday.

 

Is this serious?

 

He could be writing a book etc.

 

Well of course he could be - point being, he's been quiet on Twitter for a long time. Just re-tweets and replies.

 

Anyone who uses Twitter fancy pinging him a message, he seems fairly responsive in the past.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The releases by the BN Group were distributed by PR Newswire in the past two months.

 

One of them, issued on July 10, was titled Welcome To NETX - Global Conglomerate Bellagraph Nova Group Launches Latest Technolgy (sic) Platform Focusing On AI + Robotics + Healthcare.

 

Technolgy stonks are strong at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is Mandy still actually alive?  She’s vanished as well.

 

Hope she didn't accept the invite to the Saudi Consulate  :naughty:

 

hope she didn't accept the invite to Sean's house for a chat with a fans representative

 

He probably arrived at hers unannounced....in a balaclava.

 

Think we need to do as ED209 said.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And is Caulkin on some round-the-world cruise or something? It's a bloody long holiday.

 

Is this serious?

 

He could be writing a book etc.

The ABC of failed NUFC takeovers by George Caulkin

 

How to win the clickbait world cup whilst keeping your reputation intact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And is Caulkin on some round-the-world cruise or something? It's a bloody long holiday.

 

Is this serious?

 

He could be writing a book etc.

The ABC of failed NUFC takeovers by George Caulkin

 

Colours of Flags by George Caulkin

Link to post
Share on other sites

And is Caulkin on some round-the-world cruise or something? It's a bloody long holiday.

 

Is this serious?

 

He could be writing a book etc.

The ABC of failed NUFC takeovers by George Caulkin

 

Colours of Flags by George Caulkin

 

Really, of all the journalists throughout this whole takeover, who have baited and wrote utter crap about the takeover, Caulkin is the one you go after........

 

Trying going after the Chronicle, Mail, Telegraph, Guardian journalists.  Not an investigative bone in their bodies.  Read Twitter and write a piece about 5 things I've made up!

Link to post
Share on other sites

People having a go at George Caulkin for reporting what he's been told off the buyers?

 

Thick!

 

Not thick at all. Looking at the situation with critical eyes

 

Nothing to stop him doing some actual journalism and checking to see if what he's been told is actually based in any kind of factual world. Unless it was just an interview and reported as one, rather than taking a single source as gospel

Link to post
Share on other sites

People having a go at George Caulkin for reporting what he's been told off the buyers?

 

Thick!

 

Not thick at all. Looking at the situation with critical eyes

 

Nothing to stop him doing some actual journalism and checking to see if what he's been told is actually based in any kind of factual world. Unless it was just an interview and reported as one, rather than taking a single source as gospel

 

That's fine in most scenarios, but with one source (we are assuming) involved in a highly confidential process, I'm not sure how feasible that is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

People having a go at George Caulkin for reporting what he's been told off the buyers?

 

Thick!

 

Not thick at all. Looking at the situation with critical eyes

 

Nothing to stop him doing some actual journalism and checking to see if what he's been told is actually based in any kind of factual world. Unless it was just an interview and reported as one, rather than taking a single source as gospel

 

That's fine in most scenarios, but with one source (we are assuming) involved in a highly confidential process, I'm not sure how feasible that is.

 

In that case a decent journalist wouldn't report as fact, and would write as an opinion piece. Probably not feasible to report with checks, but that should have been made clear.

Link to post
Share on other sites

People having a go at George Caulkin for reporting what he's been told off the buyers?

 

Thick!

 

Not thick at all. Looking at the situation with critical eyes

 

Nothing to stop him doing some actual journalism and checking to see if what he's been told is actually based in any kind of factual world. Unless it was just an interview and reported as one, rather than taking a single source as gospel

 

That's fine in most scenarios, but with one source (we are assuming) involved in a highly confidential process, I'm not sure how feasible that is.

 

In that case a decent journalist wouldn't report as fact, and would write as an opinion piece. Probably not feasible to report with checks, but that should have been made clear.

 

You are literally spouting complete and utter gibberish like.

 

I don't know how thick people have to be to see it the way you do, but George has made it abundantly clear every time he's shared his bits of info that "the buyer's believe...", "it's from the buyer's", "the buyer's have been told there are no red flags". All of those things are true, or were true at the time of reporting.

 

As far as I'm aware, as someone who knows George a little bit, he hasn't once said that "THE TAKEOVER WILL BE APPROVED ON DAY XYZ".

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

People having a go at George Caulkin for reporting what he's been told off the buyers?

 

Thick!

 

Not thick at all. Looking at the situation with critical eyes

 

Nothing to stop him doing some actual journalism and checking to see if what he's been told is actually based in any kind of factual world. Unless it was just an interview and reported as one, rather than taking a single source as gospel

 

That's fine in most scenarios, but with one source (we are assuming) involved in a highly confidential process, I'm not sure how feasible that is.

 

In that case a decent journalist wouldn't report as fact, and would write as an opinion piece. Probably not feasible to report with checks, but that should have been made clear.

 

You are literally spouting complete and utter gibberish like.

 

I don't know how thick people have to be to see it the way you do, but George has made it abundantly clear every time he's shared his bits of info that "the buyer's believe...", "it's from the buyer's", "the buyer's have been told there are no red flags". All of those things are true, or were true at the time of reporting.

 

As far as I'm aware, as someone who knows George a little bit, he hasn't once said that "THE TAKEOVER WILL BE APPROVED ON DAY XYZ".

 

Saying news should have confirmed and verified sources is hardly gibberish. George may have had a confirmed source, but was never verified. Reading his pieces he only hints at this but does present it as fact even though technically he doesn't. His reports convinced a lot of people that he actually had an insight into what was going on, which over the last few weeks has been revealed as to be not the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

People having a go at George Caulkin for reporting what he's been told off the buyers?

 

Thick!

 

Not thick at all. Looking at the situation with critical eyes

 

Nothing to stop him doing some actual journalism and checking to see if what he's been told is actually based in any kind of factual world. Unless it was just an interview and reported as one, rather than taking a single source as gospel

 

That's fine in most scenarios, but with one source (we are assuming) involved in a highly confidential process, I'm not sure how feasible that is.

 

In that case a decent journalist wouldn't report as fact, and would write as an opinion piece. Probably not feasible to report with checks, but that should have been made clear.

 

You are literally spouting complete and utter gibberish like.

 

I don't know how thick people have to be to see it the way you do, but George has made it abundantly clear every time he's shared his bits of info that "the buyer's believe...", "it's from the buyer's", "the buyer's have been told there are no red flags". All of those things are true, or were true at the time of reporting.

 

As far as I'm aware, as someone who knows George a little bit, he hasn't once said that "THE TAKEOVER WILL BE APPROVED ON DAY XYZ".

 

Saying news should have confirmed and verified sources is hardly gibberish. George may have had a confirmed source, but was never verified. Reading his pieces he only hints at this but does present it as fact even though technically he doesn't. His reports convinced a lot of people that he actually had an insight into what was going on, which over the last few weeks has been revealed as to be not the case.

 

His source is literally Amanda Staveley. How much closer to the deal do you want him to be?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...