Jump to content

Takeover Thread - July 1st statement, Staveley letter to Tracey Crouch (and response) in OP


Recommended Posts

Why does a statement need to be exactly at 5? Just release it whenever it's ready.

 

Maybe it is just when they think it’s ready?

 

Or perhaps when they want it to coincide with when they have finished their day job?

Link to post
Share on other sites

PL checkmate.

NCSL have been flogging a dead horse.

 

This was always the expected outcome.

 

 

What an odd thing to say.

 

What?

 

er um . . .  :undecided:

 

I'll give you 24 hours to work it out

 

Well it sounds from what Mimms said that I'm correct and this is exactly the expected outcome. It's all legal games, shit moving in to position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't understand the confidentiality breach angle, which is obviously something that's being played on. Are they just trying to make the PL look incompetent?

 

Well it can't do any harm to our cause so fair play. Now the PL look not only like money grubbing wankers, but unprofessional as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgive me if I’m wrong, but saying you are in a legal dispute isn’t a breach of confidentiality.

 

It is if you entered into it with the confidence of the other party, surely? If the terms of the action are that the action is confidential, then it's confidential?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...