gdm Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Have noted twitter takeover gurus R E Maine and Barry Saratov had any more to say on this yet? Mind big RE Maine says we are in the 12th round about 4 months ago Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Looks like it was Saratov's birthday yesterday, so it's hard to sift through all his replies Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronson333 Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Amanda Stavley has lost her case against Barclays Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Oof. No compensation whatsoever?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Have noted twitter takeover gurus R E Maine and Barry Saratov had any more to say on this yet? Not sure about Bazza, but Harry hasn’t. Barry/Harry/Gary whatever Doesn’t really matter what he calls himself really does it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinky Jim Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Amanda Stavley has lost her case against Barclays Where did you hear that.....there’s nothing on Google. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
junkhead Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9303337/City-financier-Amanda-Staveley-LOSES-600million-High-Court-battle-Barclays.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-421 Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Amanda Stavley has lost her case against Barclays Oh well, there's Plan C, D or whatever gone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 The NUFC influence runs Everything that's connected this club just oozes failure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 What did this have to do with the takeover like? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley17 Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 What did this have to do with the takeover like? People thought, without evidence, she might buy the club outright with the winnings. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 What did this have to do with the takeover like? People thought, without evidence, she might buy the club outright with the winnings. Fair enough, I do enjoy dabbling in a bit of negativity over a hypothetical situation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-421 Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 What did this have to do with the takeover like? Is/was there not a sum of money paid 'by her' secured against any money she was hoping for from this case? I guess it also would have been nice if she/PCP were suddenly £600m richer, incase PIF were unable/unwilling to complete a takeover, as another option. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IMTTS Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PCP-v-Barclays-Summary.pdf Interesting that the judge largely confirms the truth of Staveley's allegations re the conduct of Barclays, but denies any compensation whatsoever on the grounds that PCP is basically a non-existent enterprise that had no real-world ability to raise any finance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 You don’t like her do you? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IMTTS Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 You don’t like her do you? Not one to toot my own horn but I did call the sham nature of PCP a while back: I think (could be wrong) it was just her and PCP If thats the case she should be able to afford us now with the Reubens on board too if she still has PCP backing PCP doesn't actually exist as a business. It's part of the lie that is her public persona. PCP is basically just Staveley. It's not really worth anything in and of itself and owns basically nothing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 You don’t like her do you? Not one to toot my own horn but I did call the sham nature of PCP a while back: I think (could be wrong) it was just her and PCP If thats the case she should be able to afford us now with the Reubens on board too if she still has PCP backing PCP doesn't actually exist as a business. It's part of the lie that is her public persona. PCP is basically just Staveley. It's not really worth anything in and of itself and owns basically nothing. Go fuck yourself Luke. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-421 Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 IMTTS/Penn/Edwards right now.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 IMTTS/Penn/Edwards right now.... Hope the prick chokes on Bruce's kebab riddled spunk tbph. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PCP-v-Barclays-Summary.pdf Interesting that the judge largely confirms the truth of Staveley's allegations re the conduct of Barclays, but denies any compensation whatsoever on the grounds that PCP is basically a non-existent enterprise that had no real-world ability to raise any finance. That’s not true though is it, who brought Mansour to the table for the first Barclays bail out. Did she earn 300 million for fuck all ? https://www.euromoney.com/article/b12kjth9h0p0xf/revealed-the-truth-about-barclays-and-the-abu-dhabi-investment Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Jinx Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 I did mention a while back I’d heard there was a version of the consortium that didn’t involve her going ahead. We spend too much time worrying about the Saudis and Staveley, it’s the Reubens we should have been keeping an eye on this whole time, if anything is to happen it’ll be them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 That Barclays deal was dodgy as fuck, there's a reason why the Serious Fraud Office was investigating it for years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 That Barclays deal was dodgy as fuck, there's a reason why the Serious Fraud Office was investigating it for years. Chris Lucas was key. Just saying. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Who’s Chris Lucas again? Someone linked to the PL? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts