Jump to content

Takeover Thread - July 1st statement, Staveley letter to Tracey Crouch (and response) in OP


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

As much as I hate Saudi Arabia I don't think there's much option. You can't hold out for an owner who's a good person, fans don't have that luxury. Sadly football has sold its soul already, any particular club can't be held responsible.

I bet every single premier league club owner has skeletons in the closet

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

As much as I hate Saudi Arabia I don't think there's much option. You can't hold out for an owner who's a good person, fans don't have that luxury. Sadly football has sold its soul already, any particular club can't be held responsible.


can anyone name a billionaire who is a canny lad or lass?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, gdm said:

I agree but ‘killer’ in headlines associated with our club is a hard one like. I’d love the takeover as much as the next if it’s happened 

Oh yeah, it's not a very palatable situation. There's a difference between being dodgy in business and having your critics dismembered and smuggled out of the crime scene in bags.

Link to post
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Scotty66 said:

Netflix have missed a trick here. Imagine those cameras following our club for the past year. ?

Brent - Steve Bruce

Finchy - Steve Clemence

Neil - Graeme Jones

Gareth - Jeff Hendrick

Tim - Fabian Schar

Anton, the midget who works in the warehouse - Joelinton

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111
45 minutes ago, ED209 said:


can anyone name a billionaire who is a canny lad or lass?

Bill Gates.  That's why people hate him and spread smears etc about him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

Oh yeah, it's not a very palatable situation. There's a difference between being dodgy in business and having your critics dismembered and smuggled out of the crime scene in bags.

Chelsea say Hi.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Dokko said:

I don’t think so. Large swing towards safety seems to have ignited the dying embers of takeover titbits. Which if true would suggest relegation = no sale. 

Or relegation just means the media aren't interested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, toontownman said:

So the government tried to intervene and still it didn't go through. Why is anyone confident it will now? 

 

Wait for the arbitration that’s all we can do. Let’s see if legally PIF are separate from the state. It does not matter what people say or think if they are or not, it’s what legally can be proven. Win the arbitration and it goes through. The leaks this week are off the scale and I honestly think we’re on the back straight for a arbitration decision.

 

 

Edited by et tu brute

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this was any other industry would this have been stopped because of things outside of what that company does? 
 

For example, if they wanted to buy a middling supermarket chain promising thousands of jobs, better affordable produce, etc. Would the head of that industry stall things because of who’s name is on the company? Or if they were to buy a train company and made luxurious trains, more reliable and on time more often, would the same happen there or would they stop it Richard Branson kicked up a fuss because he’d lose out? 
 

Just seems fucking shit.

 

 

Edited by Optimistic Nut

Link to post
Share on other sites

It really looks like Masters and Hoffman were acting on the strict instructions of the top 6 to stall the deal long enough for it not to happen.

Let's see what happens to those two after this sorry situation is over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ben said:

It really looks like Masters and Hoffman were acting on the strict instructions of the top 6 to stall the deal long enough for it not to happen.

Let's see what happens to those two after this sorry situation is over.

If sufficient evidence could be gathered to prove this in a court room, then I suspect the Premier League, Masters, Hoffman, and the "top 6" could also be pursued under anti-cartel/competition laws & regulations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Montey said:

If sufficient evidence could be gathered to prove this in a court room, then I suspect the Premier League, Masters, Hoffman, and the "top 6" could also be pursued under anti-cartel/competition laws & regulations.

I think either way win or lose,  both of them won't be working at the Premier League come Christmas, both have done their job as instructed and will be off with nixe golden handshakes and bloated pension pots.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Montey said:

If sufficient evidence could be gathered to prove this in a court room, then I suspect the Premier League, Masters, Hoffman, and the "top 6" could also be pursued under anti-cartel/competition laws & regulations.

This would simply be glorious.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A scan of news now this morning definitely has a lot of pro takeover articles.  Is someone leaking/putting out info in a coordinated attempt to discredit the premier league?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously you can’t deny Bin Salman’s involvement as chairman of PIF, but it’s not the same as him owning the club or being directly involved in its day to day business. And I don’t see the uproar about their other investments on the same level. They’re one of the richest investment funds in the world so naturally they will invest in large businesses used in the western world. Granted their Uber share is only 5%, but the investment was over ten times the size in value. How much of a fuss is kicked up in the media about all the Saudi money that goes into such a successful taxi company?

Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, St. Maximin said:

Obviously you can’t deny Bin Salman’s involvement as chairman of PIF, but it’s not the same as him owning the club or being directly involved in its day to day business. And I don’t see the uproar about their other investments on the same level. They’re one of the richest investment funds in the world so naturally they will invest in large businesses used in the western world. Granted their Uber share is only 5%, but the investment was over ten times the size in value. How much of a fuss is kicked up in the media about all the Saudi money that goes into such a successful taxi company?

Surely it comes back to the fact that Saudi openly pirated* premier league TV?

 

*Did nothing to stop the pirating of it anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...