Jump to content

Takeover Thread - July 1st statement, Staveley letter to Tracey Crouch (and response) in OP


Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Shearergol said:

Surely it comes back to the fact that Saudi openly pirated* premier league TV?

 

*Did nothing to stop the pirating of it anyway.

 

I pirate Premier League TV through my Amazon Firestick, as well hundreds of thousands of others no doubt. Amazon literally make no attempt to block these illegal apps that you can download onto your firestick which you can basically do in under a minute. They are one of the Premier Leagues broadcasting partners yet they still don't make any attempt to stop you doing it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, FloydianMag said:

I wondered what the reference to September was in De Marco’s tweet yesterday, this makes a little sense of it.

 

I’m the most optimistic person behind manorpark in relation to takeover, however this is due to mussels always being at there best when the month finishes with ‘ber’ at the end. I do however think he knows the correct spelling of ‘leeks’. 

 

 

Edited by Whitley mag

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Whitley mag said:

I’m the most optimistic person behind manorpark in relation to takeover, however this is due to mussels always being at there best when the month finishes with ‘ber’ at the end. I do however think he knows the correct spelling of ‘leeks’. 

So are we taking Caulkin seriously or does he know little to nothing?

 

 

Edited by FloydianMag

Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, FloydianMag said:

So are we taking Caulkin seriously or does he know little to nothing?

Never read the article mate haven’t got an Athletic subscription anymore. Caulkin is close to Staveley so I presume she would know if arbitration had begun.

Link to post
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, FloydianMag said:

So are we taking Caulkin seriously or does he know little to nothing?

He is most definitely to be taken seriously. People like to claim he got made a fool of in the summer but he didn't. He reported the situation as Amanda understood it - he's said numerous times that he has contact with her - and then the takeover was Grand Old Duked.

I do think he's erred on the side of caution though since the summer and he seems less willing to speculate. If he's putting out dates now he's most likely got good reason for believing so. Depressing.

EDIT: Having re-read Geroge's quote in context, I don't think he's saying Spetember. I think it just means "as thing stand, without an arbritration hearing", but now we know a hearing is likely to happen soon. Meltdown averted.

:saylor:

 

 

 

 

Edited by Candi_Hills

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arbitration (or even an agreement before arbitration) won't take place before we're mathematically safe.

If we were sitting comfortably in the table, we would've had a resolution either way.

As soon as it was probable (or even likely) we were going to be relegated, everything was paused.

Pointless for two very expensive legal teams fighting for a PL takeover when it may not even be necessary. 

 

 

Edited by Rocker

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shearergol said:

Surely it comes back to the fact that Saudi openly pirated* premier league TV?

 

*Did nothing to stop the pirating of it anyway.

Yeah I think it does but the media outrage seems more to do with human rights issues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Candi_Hills said:

He is most definitely to be taken seriously. People like to claim he got made a fool of in the summer but he didn't. He reported the situation as Amanda understood it - he's said numerous times that he has contact with her - and then the takeover was Grand Old Duked.

I do think he's erred on the side of caution though since the summer and he seems less willing to speculate. If he's putting out dates now he's most likely got good reason for believing so. Depressing.

 

Aye he got some amount of shit for the no red flags comment but we are hearing today even Boris Johnson was told it was days away from being done 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gdm said:

Oh joy

 

Is this not saying in the current state [of no arbritation taking place] we'll still have MA in charge next season? As opposed to saying it'll not be before August till we get a takeover. 

 

I'm sure I read Arbritation is a very quick process once it starts. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Thumbheed said:

Is this not saying in the current state [of no arbritation taking place] we'll still have MA in charge next season? As opposed to saying it'll not be before August till we get a takeover. 

 

I'm sure I read Arbritation is a very quick process once it starts. 

Pretty pointless article then. We all know Ashley remains in place if no arbitration :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FloydianMag said:

I wondered what the reference to September was in De Marco’s tweet yesterday, this makes a little sense of it.

 

Any significance to the use of leak instead of leek? Although mussel season is October to March

 

 

Edited by ED209

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, FloydianMag said:

It was ‘leak’ and ‘leek’ that first piqued my interest in his tweet.

A bulk of the newspapers picked up where they left off with the “Killer Saudi Prince” thing. Someone has to have been feeding them new information that they’d bother running with this again. Id say that’s what the reference is to.

One thing I did notice though was that the consortium/club were very naive in terms of using the press. They should have been running with a corruption theme to muddy the waters and put pressure on the PL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Candi_Hills said:

Scallops with leeks and rich mussel soup = He’s got the leaks all ready to present and then the rich muscle is moving in.

Fish supper last night = He ate Amanda out

Pretty obvious.

? do you think they let George Caulkin watch?

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dr Jinx said:

A bulk of the newspapers picked up where they left off with the “Killer Saudi Prince” thing. Someone has to have been feeding them new information that they’d bother running with this again. Id say that’s what the reference is to.

One thing I did notice though was that the consortium/club were very naive in terms of using the press. They should have been running with a corruption theme to muddy the waters and put pressure on the PL.

If you run with a theme of corruption, especially using the press to do so, you’d better be sure you’ve got evidence to back you up surely?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FloydianMag said:

If you run with a theme of corruption, especially using the press to do so, you’d better be sure you’ve got evidence to back you up surely?

When have the media ever needed evidence to run with a story? Whether MBS is guilty as sin about the Journalist, there’s fuck all evidence, like physical evidence. That he ordered and facilitated it, but that doesn’t stop the press from calling him a killer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Candi_Hills said:

Scallops with leeks and rich mussel soup = He’s got the leaks all ready to present and then the rich muscle is moving in.

Fish supper last night = He ate Amanda out

Pretty obvious.

Jesus christ :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rocker said:

Arbitration (or even an agreement before arbitration) won't take place before we're mathematically safe.

If we were sitting comfortably in the table, we would've had a resolution either way.

As soon as it was probable (or even likely) we were going to be relegated, everything was paused.

Pointless for two very expensive legal teams fighting for a PL takeover when it may not even be necessary. 

What is the dependency between league safety and the arbitration?

If the arbitration is on the directors test and who is subject to it, it's separate from our league status?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...