Jump to content

Takeover Thread - July 1st statement, Staveley letter to Tracey Crouch (and response) in OP


Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, andyc35i said:

What is this with Richard Keys that everyone refers to as evidence? I get that he works for BeIN, but I have obviously missed what the hairy bugger was saying last year about us.

That Hoffman is his BFF and will sort out the Newcastle issue.

 

 

 

Edited by Jackie Broon

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you watch that, set against the case made in NCSL's original letter before action, that the PL had a legal duty under competition law to publicly distances themselves from any hint of influence from beIN, it does not look good for them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, New Beginnings said:

Government are considering making the PL use an independent regulator for key decisions 

This is huge for the takeover! 

 

Pressure well and truly on!

 

Would that not happen in the future? And not relevant for us?

A way of the government stamping authority after this shit show though. Good news in that sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest reefatoon
2 minutes ago, POOT 2.0 said:

Maybe, but as our takeover is going to be in the future...it might fall within it. Saying that...the government would probably take 3 years and £1.4B just to get it into play. 

And then appoint Masters and Hoffman as the independent regulators

Link to post
Share on other sites

All these little bits and pieces that may look fairly innocuous on their own will hopefully add up to a unfavourable picture overall.

The Bein influence could be a big part of the anti-competition case as it must have been discussed at length at the PL - meeting minutes and emails could be pretty interesting...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tyson Fury has confirmed fight will be in Saudi

 

Saudi will now be the 'hottest' (in more ways than one) destination on the planet.

 

I think this could be great for us ?

 

 

Edited by New Beginnings
Spelling

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, New Beginnings said:

Tyson Fury has confirmed fight will be in Saudi

 

Saudi will now be the 'hottest' (in more ways than one) destination on the planet.

 

I think this could be great for us ?

Aye the fight is on the same day the Premier league starts, perfect day for a bit sport washing 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, New Beginnings said:

Tyson Fury has confirmed fight will be in Saudi

 

Saudi will now be the 'hottest' (in more ways than one) destination on the planet.

 

I think this could be great for us ?

It’s not the first high profile fight to be there though.

Isn’t Eddie Hearn a friend of Jamie Rueben?

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Stifler said:

It’s not the first high profile fight to be there though.

Isn’t Eddie Hearn a friend of Jamie Rueben?

By a country mile, its the biggest for a British audience 

This is a massive deal in world sport. Joshua v Fury is the biggest fight since Mayweather Pacquio 

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, New Beginnings said:

Tyson Fury has confirmed fight will be in Saudi

 

Saudi will now be the 'hottest' (in more ways than one) destination on the planet.

 

I think this could be great for us ?

He name dropped them a fair amount - Interesting to see if any negative press comes out. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why was it illegal, a partner of the PL could express concerns about one of its members surely? Or is the difference between expressing an opinion directly to PL and actively lobbying for support?

 

 

Edited by geordie_b

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Whitley mag said:

Is it illegal? How would that be anti-competitive? BeIN have no role to play in the league, they just own the TV rights for a set period.

Would it be illegal for Sky to write a letter to oppose our takeover? Seems a bit bizarre.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was used as an example on Friday and according to the QC O’Donoghue it was illegal. The PL said what’s the difference between an MP lobbying on our behalf, and the difference is ones illegal and ones not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Fantail Breeze said:

Is it illegal? How would that be anti-competitive? BeIN have no role to play in the league, they just own the TV rights for a set period.

Would it be illegal for Sky to write a letter to oppose our takeover? Seems a bit bizarre.

It's explained in NCSL's letter before action to the PL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Masters saying its a confidential process, yet BEIN telling everyone to block it, and Richard Keys publicly stating that it should be blocked who works for BEIN, and who is also best mates with Hoffman, who conveniently gets a top job at the PL. 

Nothing to see here, all above board governor [emoji38]

 

 

Edited by Scotty66

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bein are not a partner of the epl they are just a customer of the epl.  If they don't want pif to have a share in nufc they can refuse to bid for tv tv rights but that's just cutting of their nose to spite their face.  The epl product will be snapped up regardless!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...