Jump to content

Takeover Thread - July 1st statement, Staveley letter to Tracey Crouch (and response) in OP


Recommended Posts

And why would Fat Mike follow anything anyone  else wants?

 

£350m?

 

+ the only chance of a sale.

 

Well there's definitely no other buyers despite the best wishes of triggs, Rafalove et al's dream wishes we could attract some fair and lovely billionaire investors  :rose:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Sheffield united owner was on talksport the other day and when asked about nufc he said he had no inside track but his feeling the takeover of us would be unlikely

 

Therefore his opinion is as relevant as my dogs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Joseph DaGrosa in ownership discussions with two unnamed Premier League clubs

 

American investor turns his attention to Premier League rivals after failed Newcastle United bid

Joseph DaGrosa has reiterated his determination to buy a European football club – after failing with takeover bid for Newcastle United.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Joseph DaGrosa in ownership discussions with two unnamed Premier League clubs

 

Assume this is "The American/The Americans" we've seen referenced a few times by the likes of Winter?

 

If he was interested in December hopefully he's back for more now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll break my duck of just lurking around to add something. DaGrosa's part of the GACP group which was Kenyon's bid. He spoke about the deal being "further than people thought" (DaGrosa's words) in May but "couldn't get it over the line" (Kenyon's words). Were they the ones backed by Rockefeller Capital Management? In hindsight maybe it'd be too great a risk if only the Saudi-backed group were the only genuine, complying and competent players in 3 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Masters should either start working on rescinding Man City's state backed ownership or just shut up and fuck off. We get it, you want to pull up the drawbridge now the big boys are cemented in their lucrative positons, we don't need your fake sympathy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I’m not going to wildly speculate... But...

 

Is it completely impossible to theorise that the sale is still on but MA is working to the consortium’s requests? I.e buying the lower risk players the consortium wanted, to not totally derail their plans? If the deal doesn’t happen, MA hasn’t spent a huge amount of money and has obtained better players. If it does happen, the consortium have a bit of a head start and haven’t totally missed out in the window.

 

It was speculated that the consortium would give Bruce a chance, so maybe that’s why he’s also still in post.

 

These deals are nowhere near what MA would usually give us, so it does seem a bit odd.

 

 

 

So very true, but this analysis will still not be enough for some people to even 'imagine' that things may still be happening.

 

In a major part, I think this is because they do not want to be 'hurt / disappointed' again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Staveley had any sense, she would offer MA to take control of the club by buying 65% or whatever is the controlling stake. She can then hang the carrot of keeping his advertising for another year or so while her, the Reubens and PIF (if they are still interested) can work out a way forward.

 

The best part for MA is that someone is willing to invest in the club while he can still flog his tat (temporarily).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...