LV Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 Luke hasn't been wrong once tbf In fact he's been far closer than fan favourites Kennedy and Caulkin All rather disappointing really You absolute lemon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 Surely a little contradictory from the baldy wockney here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GWN Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 Fuck off Luke, don’t piss on me chips Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 Surely a little contradictory from the baldy wockney here. He always does that. He writes a tweet that gets attention due to negativity, then contradicts himself in either follow up tweets or in responses. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 Luke hasn't been wrong once tbf In fact he's been far closer than fan favourites Kennedy and Caulkin All rather disappointing really How's your mate Trump doing with the overturning of these votes btw? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazarus Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 Given how we 'monitor' transfer targets, thats not giving me much hope. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 Those lads probably have a lot of coin. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Jinx Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 Probably half the worlds wealth in that photo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 Probably half the worlds wealth in that photo Not many can afford a self camouflaging building. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
St1pe Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 https://youtu.be/cQ3uSj5xkHE This has been really worth watching in terms of what could be going on with DeMarco and arbitration etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Beginnings Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 Luke hasn't been wrong once tbf In fact he's been far closer than fan favourites Kennedy and Caulkin All rather disappointing really How's your mate Trump doing with the overturning of these votes btw? Christ, talk about not letting it go! Woking hell! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Beginnings Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 https://youtu.be/cQ3uSj5xkHE This has been really worth watching in terms of what could be going on with DeMarco and arbitration etc. In what way? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 4, 6, 5, 7, 1, 2, 3. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 But using which method ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 https://youtu.be/cQ3uSj5xkHE This has been really worth watching in terms of what could be going on with DeMarco and arbitration etc. In what way? Yeah not particularly enlightening IMO. She doesn't really seem to have her finger on the pulse of what's gone on to be honest. "If they [Premier League] had ongoing dialogue with PIF within a reasonable timeframe its difficult to prove they delayed the test".. What gives her the impression this was a reasonable time frame? I mean its to be proven either way obviously but she's saying that as if it seems very likely it was reasonable, which it doesn't at all. Wether it was or wasn't looking in from the outside, going by all previous OD tests, it looks excessively long in the extreme. That's before we even talk about info we've heard about the question they were asking being answered numerous times and still asked again repeatedly. Now people can say the answer might not have been acceptable to the PL, but the response to that is to make a decision based on that unacceptable answer. Not to just keep repeating the question again and again, that's absolutely a delaying tactic in anybody's book. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 But using which method ? :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toontownman Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 Page 666? Surely an apt page for an announcement a deal has been struck for the takeover? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
St1pe Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 https://youtu.be/cQ3uSj5xkHE This has been really worth watching in terms of what could be going on with DeMarco and arbitration etc. In what way? Yeah not particularly enlightening IMO. She doesn't really seem to have her finger on the pulse of what's gone on to be honest. "If they [Premier League] had ongoing dialogue with PIF within a reasonable timeframe its difficult to prove they delayed the test".. What gives her the impression this was a reasonable time frame? I mean its to be proven either way obviously but she's saying that as if it seems very likely it was reasonable, which it doesn't at all. Wether it was or wasn't looking in from the outside, going by all previous OD tests, it looks excessively long in the extreme. That's before we even talk about info we've heard about the question they were asking being answered numerous times and still asked again repeatedly. Now people can say the answer might not have been acceptable to the PL, but the response to that is to make a decision based on that unacceptable answer. Not to just keep repeating the question again and again, that's absolutely a delaying tactic in anybody's book. I disagree here and I think this is one of the reasons she’s come under so much flack on Twitter. She’s offering an opinion on what’s likely from a legal perspective not her own personal opinion. She isn’t claiming to have her finger on the pulse on the deal or what’s happening in the arbitration process. She’s consistently pointed out legal flaws in what the fan group has claimed what was possible with the separate legal proceedings, taken flack for it only to be proven right. I’m all for being hopeful about the takeover/legal proceedings but it has to be based in realism. Anyone offering anything that doesn’t tow the line that’s happening (especially on Twitter has been getting hounded). That said, I thought the vid was hopeful and informative on the position of DeMarco, what the arbitration process was and the many outcomes that could potentially come from it. She said it wouldn’t be hard to create a legal argument that the decision had been influenced from outside sources. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 Luke hasn't been wrong once tbf In fact he's been far closer than fan favourites Kennedy and Caulkin All rather disappointing really How's your mate Trump doing with the overturning of these votes btw? Christ, talk about not letting it go! Woking hell! I mean, it's pretty strong evidence that everything you post on here is absolute bollocks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GWN Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 She’s a wad Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 She’s a wad Proper! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Awaymag Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 She’s a wad Proper! what's a wad? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-421 Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 She’s a wad Proper! what's a wad? I'm guessing 'a smart looking lass, that you defintiely 'Wad' (or would)'. And yes, she is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 She’s a wad Proper! what's a wad? I'm guessing 'a smart looking lass, that you defintiely 'Wad' (or would)'. And yes, she is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts