Jump to content

Recommended Posts

After we got linked with Sesko he said that we had scouts in Leipzig watching him :lol: :lol: 

 

Too bad he doesn’t play for them.. 

 

 

Edited by Ikon

Link to post
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

On Sesko, Man Utd linked, supposedly Salzburg want 55 million for him.

 

Over double the fee Adeyemi went for - doesn't really stack up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Werner would be a good option for wide player that can play striker. Think he'll do well on a loan spell away from Chelsea. Doubt they fancy paying 2/3 of wages for him to come here though. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Werner doesn't look suited to the Premiership, and on the other hand I don't think there'll be many continental clubs who are both sufficiently rich and willing to take him on either. He won't be easy to shift.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm still of the opinion that one poor spell at Chelsea is nothing to go by for any player. They're a weird club, happy to keep finishing 3rd or 4th without ever seemingly trying to push on. It's no surprise some players come from harder working clubs and decide to coast through a few years with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Dr.Spaceman said:

I'm still of the opinion that one poor spell at Chelsea is nothing to go by for any player. They're a weird club, happy to keep finishing 3rd or 4th without ever seemingly trying to push on. It's no surprise some players come from harder working clubs and decide to coast through a few years with them.

 

I don’t mind getting him but not at 300K ppw. That would unsettle the whole team.

Link to post
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Dr.Spaceman said:

I'm still of the opinion that one poor spell at Chelsea is nothing to go by for any player. They're a weird club, happy to keep finishing 3rd or 4th without ever seemingly trying to push on. It's no surprise some players come from harder working clubs and decide to coast through a few years with them.

They keep trying tbf.

 

I would take Werner on loan 100%

Link to post
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Dr.Spaceman said:

I'm still of the opinion that one poor spell at Chelsea is nothing to go by for any player. They're a weird club, happy to keep finishing 3rd or 4th without ever seemingly trying to push on. It's no surprise some players come from harder working clubs and decide to coast through a few years with them.

Not sure they don’t try and push on tbh, they are regularly close to being the biggest spenders. They where considered favourites for the title by loads last season when they bought in Lukaku.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Dr.Spaceman said:

I'm still of the opinion that one poor spell at Chelsea is nothing to go by for any player. They're a weird club, happy to keep finishing 3rd or 4th without ever seemingly trying to push on. It's no surprise some players come from harder working clubs and decide to coast through a few years with them.


Not sure about this tbh - the club that won the CL the year before last? :lol: Happy to keep finishing 3rd or 4th? They’re just like most of the top teams - got blown out by Liverpool and Man City last year. What should they have done differently? They spend a fortune every year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

Not sure they don’t try and push on tbh, they are regularly close to being the biggest spenders. They where considered favourites for the title by loads last season when they bought in Lukaku.  

 

Aye, but selling two very good 23 years olds in Tammy Abraham and Fikayo Tomori to then spend and extra 30 million (net transfer fee) on a 28 year old striker who last scored the same amount of league goals as Luka Milivojevic just seems a bit weird to me. They just seem to sign people based on their reputation rather than players who'll actually be a good fit for their system.

 

I guess changing manager often doesn't really help, maybe that's just it tbh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dr.Spaceman said:

 

Aye, but selling two very good 23 years olds in Tammy Abraham and Fikayo Tomori to then spend and extra 30 million (net transfer fee) on a 28 year old striker who last scored the same amount of league goals as Luka Milivojevic just seems a bit weird to me. They just seem to sign people based on their reputation rather than players who'll actually be a good fit for their system.

 

I guess changing manager often doesn't really help, maybe that's just it tbh.


Yeah, that just means they’ve made poor choices rather than that they’re happy to finish 3rd/4th. If that were really true they’d have stuck with the managers for longer. And, again, they won the CL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Dr.Spaceman said:

 

Aye, but selling two very good 23 years olds in Tammy Abraham and Fikayo Tomori to then spend and extra 30 million (net transfer fee) on a 28 year old striker who last scored the same amount of league goals as Luka Milivojevic just seems a bit weird to me. They just seem to sign people based on their reputation rather than players who'll actually be a good fit for their system.

 

I guess changing manager often doesn't really help, maybe that's just it tbh.

Tammy wasn't getting a kick before Lukaku came in anyway. They needed to sell him (because of Tuchel). The Lukaku thing made some sense. Less of a supposed gamble than their other striker options - even at Man U Lukaku scored 16 and 12 league goals - nobody thought he could do worse than 12. 

 

Tomori wasn't getting a kick either. They wanted to extend Christensen and Rudiger. They also had Sarr & Chalobah coming through.

 

These ultimately were proven to be poor choices but they all had decent logic behind it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...