Jump to content

Recommended Posts

really don't know where the hell he'll end up. Nigh on impossible to see another prem club thinking this is a good idea unless they're incredibly desperate and think they can get him cheap (so maybe everton) but the PR backlash would just move from man utd to whatever club tries to get him 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So from a friend of a friend of a friend, you get the picture, I've heard that these two (him and her) are a right couple, as in can't be away from each other - then can't stand the sight of each other. (imagine a steptoe and son partnership but on steroids).

 

That's why you are hearing what you are when he said that's not the full picture - it like they were goading each other.

 

After the incident - she was told to leave to the house (by lawyers) but then her parents told her to move back in - which she did.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, South-Cheshire-Toon said:

So from a friend of a friend of a friend, you get the picture, I've heard that these two (him and her) are a right couple, as in can't be away from each other - then can't stand the sight of each other. (imagine a steptoe and son partnership but on steroids).

 

That's why you are hearing what you are when he said that's not the full picture - it like they were goading each other.

 

After the incident - she was told to leave to the house (by lawyers) but then her parents told her to move back in - which she did.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
2 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

I thought he was leaving the club as in being released. 

 

That's exactly what Man U's statement wanted you to think, to placate the screaming masses. But reading between the lines it was obvious they weren't firing him. He's worth too much. He'll be loaned to be sold, or maybe even reintegrated into Man U's team in time.

 

Money >>>> Morals

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, El Prontonise said:

 

Sack yes.

 

Unfair dismissal is certain from Greenwood if they do.

 

Surely there'll be something about being the club into disrepute or damaging their image or something in the contract?

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, gbandit said:

I thought that, the audio alone could be used for gross misconduct even without a trial? Or am I being too naive

 

From the Richard Arnold statement:

 

"We were provided with alternative explanations for the audio recording, which was a short excerpt from a much longer recording, and for the images posted online."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...