Jump to content

Recommended Posts

😂 Lowest common denominator stuff to get a cheer, in the band isn't there a Man U, bin dippers, scouse mackems fan each and the other doesn't give a fuck about football?

 

Be hilarious if they start doing the exact thing they accuse Fender of mind the whoppers, be lapping it up.

 

Ah went ta skeyewell with one of them and they were always MLFs marra.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Scoot said:

 

But I thought bringing football stuff into a music concert was frowned upon by the mackems? Is it fine now?

Wonder how the weird fuckers will try and spin the Marrative around this one. Probably similar to “Durham Mags = evil; Northumberland Mackems = the hardiest of souls”.

 

Freaks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So theyve went from a Poundland version of Wor-flags to this Wetherspoons Sam Fender. The dopey cunts should try copying qualifying for the CL, then maybe that washed-up twat from the fewtchaheads wouldn't have to explain where sunderland is to a disinterested crowd.

 

 

Edited by bhoywhonder

Link to post
Share on other sites

I quite like the futureheads got no problem with them doing that like I’d no problem with Sam Fender doing it however the Mackems started it with their weird sam fender chant and flag. 
 

Saying FTM seems to be a prerequisite for being a Sunderland fan 

 

 

Edited by gdm

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, gdm said:

I quite like the futureheads got no problem with them doing that like I’d no problem with Sam Fender doing it however the Mackems started it with their weird sam fender chant and flag. 
 

Saying FTM seems to be a prerequisite for being a Sunderland fan 

 

 

 

 

Grammatically it replaces a full stop in Wearside English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

image.thumb.png.6de4db4cbdad25ea3ee527650e74ed8c.png
 

Racist mod and thick cunt Keith at it again with being clueless. No Keith you are looking at not being above a £61 million PSR loss for your club. A club that has already seen losses for the last two seasons and is now in deficit of £80 million roughly in transfers. With increased wages and bonuses to be added to that also. These fuckers are going to be right in the shite PSR wise if they stay up, without further investment or a large number of sales. They will also be in big financial problems if they go down, as the values to sell off the players they have bought, will go down also. A massive gamble by the owners in every way. Let's see if they are so cocky (fuck knows why they are anyway) come May. 

 

 

Edited by et tu brute

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, et tu brute said:

image.thumb.png.6de4db4cbdad25ea3ee527650e74ed8c.png
 

Racist mod and thick cunt Keith at it again with being clueless. No Keith you are looking at not being above a £61 million PSR loss for your club. A club that has already seen losses for the last two seasons and is now in deficit of £80 million roughly in transfers. With increased wages and bonuses to be added to that also. These fuckers are going to be right in the shite PSR wise if they stay up, without further investment or a large number of sales. They will also be in big financial problems if they go down, as the values to sell off the players they have bought, will go down also. A massive gamble by the owners in every way. Let's see if they are so cocky (fuck knows why they are anyway) come May. 

 

 

 

 

It's actually £15m loss permitted over the three years though isn't it?  The owners are allowed to chuck in £90m to bring it up to £105m.  Wonder how long their owner is going to be willing to shell out that much to keep them within the limits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, loki679 said:

 

It's actually £15m loss permitted over the three years though isn't it?  The owners are allowed to chuck in £90m to bring it up to £105m.  Wonder how long their owner is going to be willing to shell out that much to keep them within the limits.


Not for promoted clubs in their first PL year outside of the three years, it's a total of £61 million loss over the three years. Burnley is £83 million. Anything above that, then it's a points deduction if they stay up. I already mentioned more investment and player sales (not get a fortune from that with the quality of players involved)

 

 

Edited by et tu brute

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, et tu brute said:

image.thumb.png.6de4db4cbdad25ea3ee527650e74ed8c.png
 

Racist mod and thick cunt Keith at it again with being clueless. No Keith you are looking at not being above a £61 million PSR loss for your club. A club that has already seen losses for the last two seasons and is now in deficit of £80 million roughly in transfers. With increased wages and bonuses to be added to that also. These fuckers are going to be right in the shite PSR wise if they stay up, without further investment or a large number of sales. They will also be in big financial problems if they go down, as the values to sell off the players they have bought, will go down also. A massive gamble by the owners in every way. Let's see if they are so cocky (fuck knows why they are anyway) come May. 

 

 

 

Dangerous President!

Link to post
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, ramirez said:

Reminds me of working with mackems who would 'red-chester' clients on systems,  chester draws was another good one.  Somethink too.

Somethink, nothink, anythink. 

Does my head in. Although I have heard BBC presenters do the same. Thick cunts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, et tu brute said:

image.thumb.png.875eed44f199207e44ef3e37d8d9e8b9.png
 

No you daft twat, he said you have to earn the right to train with the team. Another bullshit example from the inbred cunts [emoji38]

image.png

 

I haven't been keeping up with the Marrative regarding Isak.

 

Is he back to being an overated Shola regen who wouldn't get a game ahead of Isidor or is he still a world class asset whose departure will set the mags back years?

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, liammc414 said:

 

I haven't been keeping up with the Marrative regarding Isak.

 

Is he back to being an overated Shola regen who wouldn't get a game ahead of Isidor or is he still a world class asset whose departure will set the mags back years?


Second of your points. Even crinkly granny aka vinegar tits is posting constantly after not been seen for a few years on any Newcastle thread [emoji38]

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ramirez said:

Reminds me of working with mackems who would 'red-chester' clients on systems,  chester draws was another good one.  Somethink too.

 

Some of them possibly do. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...