Guest Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Not to sound like a broken record but Wijnaldum was much more of a disgrace than Sissoko for the second half of last season including that game Probably a key reason why they do so poorly against crap sides. The lad cannot be arsed a lot of the timew 3 of his 4 goals have been against City, Chelsea & Arsenal like. Last season for us he scored against Chelsea, Liverpool, Man Utd & Spurs. It's not like didn't turn up against the 'big boys'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Not to sound like a broken record but Wijnaldum was much more of a disgrace than Sissoko for the second half of last season including that game Probably a key reason why they do so poorly against crap sides. The lad cannot be arsed a lot of the timew 3 of his 4 goals have been against City, Chelsea & Arsenal like. Last season for us he scored against Chelsea, Liverpool, Man Utd & Spurs. It's not like didn't turn up against the 'big boys'. That was his point Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 I'm good at this lately. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinotheprehistoricgeordie Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Sorry, what does beamed back mean? NUFC showing a live feed of the game back at St. James' Park when the match isn't on the TV. See https://www.nufc.co.uk/news/latest-news/free-beam-back-for-royals-clash Just saw this, thanks Greg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 I like the spelling of Njukasl. Special mentions to Hal, Notingem and Sautempton - the team who are intrigued and really thinking about it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Njukasl Jedinstven sounds much better imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benwell Lad Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Karl Darlow is the Njukasl golmani. Nice language Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 If/When we go up we're going to have to move the away fans next season (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2016/11/10/away-fans-to-be-pitch-side-at-every-premier-league-game-next-sea/). Have STs gone on sale yet as some people are going to be moved? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 If/When we go up we're going to have to move the away fans next season (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2016/11/10/away-fans-to-be-pitch-side-at-every-premier-league-game-next-sea/). Have STs gone on sale yet as some people are going to be moved? Saw something in the Fans Forum minutes that they are looking at this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 If/When we go up we're going to have to move the away fans next season (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2016/11/10/away-fans-to-be-pitch-side-at-every-premier-league-game-next-sea/). Have STs gone on sale yet as some people are going to be moved? I inferred from the fans forum meeting that the club had made representations to the Premier League for permission not to do so on safety grounds. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Cheers chaps, was wondering where they'd go. I'm guessing safety = costs in this instance too as they'd have to reconfigure the ground. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benwell Lad Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Cheers chaps, was wondering where they'd go. I'm guessing safety = costs in this instance too as they'd have to reconfigure the ground. The reason they were moved from the west corner of the L7 Leazes to the east side was to assist policing/stewarding i.e. only having one end of segregation. Would cause problems to move them anywhere else now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Man Utd paid for their fans’ visas who went last night which is what I said we should have done for the idiots like me who went to Moscow four years ago! They were about £200 each for a three day trip! Scandalous really! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Cheers chaps, was wondering where they'd go. I'm guessing safety = costs in this instance too as they'd have to reconfigure the ground. The reason they were moved from the west corner of the L7 Leazes to the east side was to assist policing/stewarding i.e. only having one end of segregation. Would cause problems to move them anywhere else now. Aye, hopefully the club will get their own way. Absolutely ridiculous rule that offers fuck all other than inconveniencing clubs like us with a grand stadium rather than those daft Lego setups. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaydnNUFC Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Cheers chaps, was wondering where they'd go. I'm guessing safety = costs in this instance too as they'd have to reconfigure the ground. The reason they were moved from the west corner of the L7 Leazes to the east side was to assist policing/stewarding i.e. only having one end of segregation. Would cause problems to move them anywhere else now. Aye, hopefully the club will get their own way. Absolutely ridiculous rule that offers f*** all other than inconveniencing clubs like us with a grand stadium rather than those daft Lego setups. Agreed. Why was the rule put into place anyway? To give fans a worse view and cause massive inconvenience for stewards and police? And anyway if it was absolutely compulsory wouldn't it only affect us and the mackems (if they stayed up)? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Cheers chaps, was wondering where they'd go. I'm guessing safety = costs in this instance too as they'd have to reconfigure the ground. The reason they were moved from the west corner of the L7 Leazes to the east side was to assist policing/stewarding i.e. only having one end of segregation. Would cause problems to move them anywhere else now. Aye, hopefully the club will get their own way. Absolutely ridiculous rule that offers f*** all other than inconveniencing clubs like us with a grand stadium rather than those daft Lego setups. Agreed. Why was the rule put into place anyway? To give fans a worse view and cause massive inconvenience for stewards and police? And anyway if it was absolutely compulsory wouldn't it only affect us and the mackems (if they stayed up)? Aye, we're the only ones who it'd effect. mackems would just move them back to behind the goal. A rule bought in with Sky's influence to MAKE VIEWING EVEN BETTER!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaydnNUFC Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Cheers chaps, was wondering where they'd go. I'm guessing safety = costs in this instance too as they'd have to reconfigure the ground. The reason they were moved from the west corner of the L7 Leazes to the east side was to assist policing/stewarding i.e. only having one end of segregation. Would cause problems to move them anywhere else now. Aye, hopefully the club will get their own way. Absolutely ridiculous rule that offers f*** all other than inconveniencing clubs like us with a grand stadium rather than those daft Lego setups. Agreed. Why was the rule put into place anyway? To give fans a worse view and cause massive inconvenience for stewards and police? And anyway if it was absolutely compulsory wouldn't it only affect us and the mackems (if they stayed up)? Aye, we're the only ones who it'd effect. mackems would just move them back to behind the goal. A rule bought in with Sky's influence to MAKE VIEWING EVEN BETTER!!! If we had to move them we'd have them out of view of the TV cameras anyway Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Cheers chaps, was wondering where they'd go. I'm guessing safety = costs in this instance too as they'd have to reconfigure the ground. The reason they were moved from the west corner of the L7 Leazes to the east side was to assist policing/stewarding i.e. only having one end of segregation. Would cause problems to move them anywhere else now. Aye, hopefully the club will get their own way. Absolutely ridiculous rule that offers f*** all other than inconveniencing clubs like us with a grand stadium rather than those daft Lego setups. Agreed. Why was the rule put into place anyway? To give fans a worse view and cause massive inconvenience for stewards and police? And anyway if it was absolutely compulsory wouldn't it only affect us and the mackems (if they stayed up)? Aye, we're the only ones who it'd effect. mackems would just move them back to behind the goal. A rule bought in with Sky's influence to MAKE VIEWING EVEN BETTER!!! Man Utd potentially too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevo Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Cheers chaps, was wondering where they'd go. I'm guessing safety = costs in this instance too as they'd have to reconfigure the ground. The reason they were moved from the west corner of the L7 Leazes to the east side was to assist policing/stewarding i.e. only having one end of segregation. Would cause problems to move them anywhere else now. Aye, hopefully the club will get their own way. Absolutely ridiculous rule that offers f*** all other than inconveniencing clubs like us with a grand stadium rather than those daft Lego setups. Agreed. Why was the rule put into place anyway? To give fans a worse view and cause massive inconvenience for stewards and police? And anyway if it was absolutely compulsory wouldn't it only affect us and the mackems (if they stayed up)? Aye, we're the only ones who it'd effect. mackems would just move them back to behind the goal. A rule bought in with Sky's influence to MAKE VIEWING EVEN BETTER!!! Man Utd potentially too. Man Utd don't have to move the away fans as it's a handful of disabled seats below. Can't remember the exact wording of the reason, but they are fine with the current setup. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Cheers chaps, was wondering where they'd go. I'm guessing safety = costs in this instance too as they'd have to reconfigure the ground. The reason they were moved from the west corner of the L7 Leazes to the east side was to assist policing/stewarding i.e. only having one end of segregation. Would cause problems to move them anywhere else now. Aye, hopefully the club will get their own way. Absolutely ridiculous rule that offers f*** all other than inconveniencing clubs like us with a grand stadium rather than those daft Lego setups. Agreed. Why was the rule put into place anyway? To give fans a worse view and cause massive inconvenience for stewards and police? And anyway if it was absolutely compulsory wouldn't it only affect us and the mackems (if they stayed up)? Aye, we're the only ones who it'd effect. mackems would just move them back to behind the goal. A rule bought in with Sky's influence to MAKE VIEWING EVEN BETTER!!! Man Utd potentially too. Man Utd don't have to move the away fans as it's a handful of disabled seats below. Can't remember the exact wording of the reason, but they are fine with the current setup. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted March 11, 2017 Share Posted March 11, 2017 Cheers chaps, was wondering where they'd go. I'm guessing safety = costs in this instance too as they'd have to reconfigure the ground. The reason they were moved from the west corner of the L7 Leazes to the east side was to assist policing/stewarding i.e. only having one end of segregation. Would cause problems to move them anywhere else now. Aye, hopefully the club will get their own way. Absolutely ridiculous rule that offers f*** all other than inconveniencing clubs like us with a grand stadium rather than those daft Lego setups. I'm all for it. Anything to wake up the ground on match day. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted March 11, 2017 Share Posted March 11, 2017 If he fails to get them up next season that'll be it. Obscurity forever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted March 11, 2017 Share Posted March 11, 2017 Cheers chaps, was wondering where they'd go. I'm guessing safety = costs in this instance too as they'd have to reconfigure the ground. The reason they were moved from the west corner of the L7 Leazes to the east side was to assist policing/stewarding i.e. only having one end of segregation. Would cause problems to move them anywhere else now. Aye, hopefully the club will get their own way. Absolutely ridiculous rule that offers f*** all other than inconveniencing clubs like us with a grand stadium rather than those daft Lego setups. I'm all for it. Anything to wake up the ground on match day. This. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted March 11, 2017 Share Posted March 11, 2017 The main problem I see now also with atmosphere at football is game management by not only players but officials more so. The idea that they are taught these days to calm the game down to avoid incident is very troubling. Football is far too stop start now with little goalmouth incident to what you should get in 90mins. Ball in play should maybe be included these days to stop time wasting. Probably get 40mins actual football these days. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
U2 Posted March 11, 2017 Share Posted March 11, 2017 You get about 60-65 minutes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now