Jump to content

James Maddison (now playing for Tottenham Hotspur)


The Prophet

Recommended Posts

With an attacking/dynamic LB he could be a decent option as an inverted wide player on the left too. Him and Arda Guler would be class. Would give us options both wide and centrally.

 

 

Edited by Ikon

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

 

Good question, and raises the issue of where Maddison will fit in. No idea personally, unless we're going to 4-2-3-1.

There is a video on Twitter where he talks about his responsibilities when playing as an #8 so if we do sign him it will be either there or wide right I think.

 

It doesn’t hurt to have the players to swap up formations but if Howe was thinking 4-2-3-1 at any point then it’s hard to believe he would have shoehorned Isak out on the left at the end of the season.

 

https://twitter.com/nufcgallowgate/status/1668194244534710273?s=46

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, SteV said:

£65m would make him one of the most expensive ‘one year left’ players in history 


Presumably we’d be negotiating a new contract with him at the same time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, KetsbaiaIsBald said:

 

He missed an absolute sitter for us with that Watford lad.


It ended up being wrong, but the info was right at the time. He was coming and then something (Wilson injury / more money / Isak discount) changed our plans. Just look at who broke the Pedro to Brighton news - he clearly has a source close to the player.

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, RobsonsWonderland said:

65 million package... We must be bidding 30 mil + Ryan Frazer.

 

Well if they are going to quote silly figures I might as well! 

65m £ for a player in last year and also for a club that is having serious issues with their economy is a laugh. They have no cards while everyone buying from them have a full house.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He'll be able to play as an attacking 8, 10, and LW/RW. Versatility Eddie loves. He'll be our key door unlocker. We desperately need players who are ball players like Bruno in addition to our runners. I have 0 doubts about his adaptability. We had no clue half of our players could be pressing machines until they were COACHED to do so. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, we are talking in EXACT fees. The line between a 40m deal and a 60m deal can be blurred by instalments and clauses.

 

I'd be looking at 40m plus another 10m after so many matches and goal contributions.

 

I wouldn't be surprised to see them interested in a few of our fringe players. Lascelles would be a great signing for Leicester.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, timeEd32 said:

Will Tripps still be on free kicks if he comes?

 

They'll probably trade off, which makes it even more exciting. I could see Trips on corners to allow for Maddison short or top of box for long range howitzers 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kanji said:

He'll be able to play as an attacking 8, 10, and LW/RW. Versatility Eddie loves. He'll be our key door unlocker. We desperately need players who are ball players like Bruno in addition to our runners. I have 0 doubts about his adaptability. We had no clue half of our players could be pressing machines until they were COACHED to do so. 

Whilst I agree with the versatility, I’m hesitant to play him on the right as the triangle movement and runs on that side are based on the RW and Longstaff’s movement. I really don’t know where I’d play him in the team, but we definitely need the preseason to figure it out 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, STM said:

Again, we are talking in EXACT fees. The line between a 40m deal and a 60m deal can be blurred by instalments and clauses.

 

I'd be looking at 40m plus another 10m after so many matches and goal contributions.

 

I wouldn't be surprised to see them interested in a few of our fringe players. Lascelles would be a great signing for Leicester.


wouldn’t be surprised if there is some speculative clauses in there about CL progression etc, allows teams to save face by announcing “a fee that could rise to £60m”

Link to post
Share on other sites

He could easily play in Miggys position but play it in an entirely different way...

 

                      Bruno

     Longstaff         

                                   Willock

             Maddison        Joelinton                           Isak

 

Trippier gives us mountains of width and Madders and Longstaff could make those runs into space wide or centrally.

 

Tripper is key to everything down that side because he plays more as a RM than a RB.

 

Edit: tried fucking about with the above formation but it won't sit properly.

 

 

Edited by STM

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, GeordieDazzler said:


wouldn’t be surprised if there is some speculative clauses in there about CL progression etc, allows teams to save face by announcing “a fee that could rise to £60m”

 

Aye, we've probably knocked the "CL qualification" clause on the head like. [emoji38]

 

Wonder if we made any payments to Sociedad, Lyon or Lille off the back of champions league qualification 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...