Jump to content

Now That's What I Call Transfer Rumours! 7


Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, Coffee_Johnny said:

Ramos, Gallagher, &  Hudson-Odoi. Yes please and thank you very much. 
Oh! and Pedro. Why not, while we are at it!

 

 

 

Sounds a lot better than ending up with selling Bruno (only a rumour, Iknow!) and João Pedro instead of said Ramos. 
Add Pulisic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, LV said:

1 loan from Chelsea is all I can see unfortunately. Probably CHO 

There’s only going to be one loan from Chelsea, because club cannot loan two players from same club. Probably nobody meant it here, but if it’s unclear to someone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ref all of the talk about bids being rejected and us having lots of interest in various players, I have a feeling it's less about price per say and much more about structure of the deal.

 

We might prefer to spend £10m more on a slightly lesser player if we can spread the fee's rather than spanking a huge wad up front on someone like Maddison where Leicester clearly need the cash now to reinvest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Elephant said:

There’s only going to be one loan from Chelsea, because club cannot loan two players from same club. Probably nobody meant it here, but if it’s unclear to someone.


Yeah, aware of that rule. I just meant only signing I could see was a loan from Chelsea.

 

The new Pedro stuff might change that though 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CHO has done very little in his career. The reason he came to prominence is because Bayern wanted to sign him and suddenly everybody was getting angry at Sarri for not playing him rather than anything he did on the pitch

Link to post
Share on other sites

From Caulkin's piece:

 

The message that they will not be suckered into paying over the odds has been received clearly (they were quoted £50million for Botman in January but ended up paying Lille closer to £36million for him last month). 

 

If that isn't justification of their approach I don't know what is. It was ages ago so doesn't feel like it but Botman could still yet be the biggest/most impressive/most lasting acquisition we'll make this summer, even if two attackers come in. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Yorkie said:

From Caulkin's piece:

 

The message that they will not be suckered into paying over the odds has been received clearly (they were quoted £50million for Botman in January but ended up paying Lille closer to £36million for him last month). 

 

If that isn't justification of their approach I don't know what is. It was ages ago so doesn't feel like it but Botman could still yet be the biggest/most impressive/most lasting acquisition we'll make this summer, even if two attackers come in. 

Worth noting that prices are also likely to be a lot higher in January than summer mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...