Jump to content

Now That's What I Call Transfer Rumours! 7


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, LFEE said:

Looks like at the moment £120kpw is the ceiling and this will gradually increase as the squad improves and players under contract prove their worth over a decent period of time. 

Yep exactly, I said (back in Jan?) I thought wed be approaching this slowly and as we had just brought in Trips/Bruno on around that number it seemed logical that 120kish was the limit for now. 100% it will be pushed this summer though, all the signs are there.. new contracts for Bruno and maybe ASM depending on the mid/long term plans for him is what I expect to happen at some point in the near future which would put them towards or about 150k pw (Bruno perhaps even a little higher). 2 maybe even 3 players in the summer brought in at that sort of number would seem the next logical step.

 

 

Edited by Nine

Link to post
Share on other sites

So far their strategy has been virtually impeccable. Here's some ratings for no other reason than I'm bored:

 

Trippier: He's been our talisman. Has been a key reason for our mentality change. 10/10

 

Wood: Ultimately he's a dud but we were in a tight spot and at least we weakened Burnley. 5/10

 

Bruno: Second only to De Bruyne in the PL IMO, unreal signing. 10/10

 

Burn: Versatile, good with his feet, a leader, experienced, great character. Transformed our defence. 8/10

 

Targett: Solid as a rock. Good lad. Not blessed with attacking instincts but Mr Reliable. 7/10

 

Pope: Alot of raised eyebrows about whether we needed a GK but he's proven an absolute bargain. 8/10

 

Botman: Would it be clichéd to say Rolls Royce? 10/10

 

Isak: Time will tell. From an ambition perspective I will give it a 9/10

 

A 7/8 strike rate is good going in the world of transfers. Overall they get a 9/10 for transfer performance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, STM said:

So far their strategy has been virtually impeccable. Here's some ratings for no other reason than I'm bored:

 

Trippier: He's been our talisman. Has been a key reason for our mentality change. 10/10

 

Wood: Ultimately he's a dud but we were in a tight spot and at least we weakened Burnley. 5/10

 

Bruno: Second only to De Bruyne in the PL IMO, unreal signing. 10/10

 

Burn: Versatile, good with his feet, a leader, experienced, great character. Transformed our defence. 8/10

 

Targett: Solid as a rock. Good lad. Not blessed with attacking instincts but Mr Reliable. 7/10

 

Pope: Alot of raised eyebrows about whether we needed a GK but he's proven an absolute bargain. 8/10

 

Botman: Would it be clichéd to say Rolls Royce? 10/10

 

Isak: Time will tell. From an ambition perspective I will give it a 9/10

 

A 7/8 strike rate is good going in the world of transfers. Overall they get a 9/10 for transfer performance.

 

Wood is a 3/10, at best. I'll refrain from scoring Isak as its early days, but I can get on board with the rest of your ratings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, hearing the term Rolls-Royce of a defender being aimed at Botman. I always thought the idea of a RR player is that they are superb quality but the reliability isn't there and always breaking down. Hence why it was aimed at Rio & Woodgate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Dokko said:

Also, hearing the term Rolls-Royce of a defender being aimed at Botman. I always thought the idea of a RR player is that they are superb quality but the reliability isn't there and always breaking down. Hence why it was aimed at Rio & Woodgate.

Errr, no. Just top of the range. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Dokko said:

Also, hearing the term Rolls-Royce of a defender being aimed at Botman. I always thought the idea of a RR player is that they are superb quality but the reliability isn't there and always breaking down. Hence why it was aimed at Rio & Woodgate.

Eh?

 

 

E5317968-E615-446C-8C1C-273865F97E3C.jpeg

59CDAC6E-3FA4-4355-8336-5D086ABCA457.jpeg

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, STM said:

So far their strategy has been virtually impeccable. Here's some ratings for no other reason than I'm bored:

 

Trippier: He's been our talisman. Has been a key reason for our mentality change. 10/10

 

Wood: Ultimately he's a dud but we were in a tight spot and at least we weakened Burnley. 5/10

 

Bruno: Second only to De Bruyne in the PL IMO, unreal signing. 10/10

 

Burn: Versatile, good with his feet, a leader, experienced, great character. Transformed our defence. 8/10

 

Targett: Solid as a rock. Good lad. Not blessed with attacking instincts but Mr Reliable. 7/10

 

Pope: Alot of raised eyebrows about whether we needed a GK but he's proven an absolute bargain. 8/10

 

Botman: Would it be clichéd to say Rolls Royce? 10/10

 

Isak: Time will tell. From an ambition perspective I will give it a 9/10

 

A 7/8 strike rate is good going in the world of transfers. Overall they get a 9/10 for transfer performance.

A Man U supporter said another Man U fan today, "name me a better signing of the lady 12 months than Bruno Guimarães?". With the tongue only slightly in my cheek I responded with "Kieran Tripper ?"

Tells its own story that a player as incredible as Bruno isn't by far the best signing we've made in the last January transfer window :snod:

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Dokko said:

Also, hearing the term Rolls-Royce of a defender being aimed at Botman. I always thought the idea of a RR player is that they are superb quality but the reliability isn't there and always breaking down. Hence why it was aimed at Rio & Woodgate.

When did you last see a Rolls Royce on the side of the road?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming we add say one attacker in Jan, come the summer we’ll really be beefing up the squad and potency. I’d imagine a solid number 2 keeper, another left back (maybe more attacking in nature) to compete with Targett, sitting/defensive midfielder, a young forward (Wood will probably go), a new starting right sided CB

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ExiledGeordie said:

Assuming we add say one attacker in Jan, come the summer we’ll really be beefing up the squad and potency. I’d imagine a solid number 2 keeper, another left back (maybe more attacking in nature) to compete with Targett, sitting/defensive midfielder, a young forward (Wood will probably go), a new starting right sided CB

One! :tobey:

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, geordie_b said:

What about a Land Rover defender?

Never mind them what about Range Rovers, especially Evokes. Used to be marquee but now they're like dog shit. 

Everywhere. Mostly black. 

Was a time when it was just gangsters and royalty had them. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Dokko said:

Also, hearing the term Rolls-Royce of a defender being aimed at Botman. I always thought the idea of a RR player is that they are superb quality but the reliability isn't there and always breaking down. Hence why it was aimed at Rio & Woodgate.

I think you're remembering what Freddie Shepherd said when he sold Woodgate to Madrid: "there's no point having a Rolls-Royce if it spends most of its time in the garage." 

 

I remember how angry I was with him at the time for selling our best player, but he was definitely proved correct. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Groundhog63 said:

Never mind them what about Range Rovers, especially Evokes. Used to be marquee but now they're like dog shit. 

Everywhere. Mostly black. 

Was a time when it was just gangsters and royalty had them. 

Evoques are shit and only cost about 30k proper Range Rovers are not and cost about 100k for a decent one

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...